Author

admin

Browsing

Former president Donald Trump’s campaign is bringing on new staff — including his controversial 2016 campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski — as it continues to adjust to facing his new Democratic opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris.

In addition to Lewandowski, the campaign is adding Tim Murtaugh, the communications director from Trump’s 2020 campaign, as well as three former officials from a pro-Trump super PAC: Alex Pfeiffer, Alex Bruesewitz and Taylor Budowich.

“As we head into the home stretch of this election, we are continuing to add to our impressive campaign team,” Trump’s co-campaign managers, Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita, said in a statement Thursday. The five hires, they added, “are all veterans of prior Trump campaigns and their unmatched experience will help President Trump prosecute the case against Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, the most radical ticket in American history.”

The hires were first reported by Politico.

Trump has been annoyed for weeks at the direction of his campaign, even though many of the major errors have been made by the candidate. He has called allies asking if he should replace anyone, The Washington Post has reported.

Some 2016 alumni have voiced dissatisfaction with Wiles and LaCivita, suspecting them of controlling access to the former president and excluding or impugning longtime loyalists such as contributors to the Project 2025 policy blueprint. LaCivita has dismissed those detractors as a distraction.

Trump has publicly stood by Wiles and LaCivita, telling the New York Times on Friday he was “thrilled” with them.

Lewandowski sought distance from Trump after 2020 and toyed with working with other Republicans but came back around as it was clear Trump was going to be the nominee, people who spoke with him said. They requested anonymity to share private conversations.

Lewandowski has been in and out of Trump’s orbit since serving as his first campaign manager in 2016. Trump fired Lewandowski as he entered the general election that year, months after Lewandowski was accused of assaulting a reporter at a campaign news conference in Florida.

Lewandowski became a political commentator, including for CNN, and later joined a pro-Trump super PAC while Trump was in the White House. He was removed from the super PAC in 2021 after a donor accused him of repeatedly groping her and making unwanted sexual comments at a charity event in Las Vegas.

Trump has increasingly spoken with Lewandowski in recent weeks to discuss his campaign, including staffing and strategy, according to a person familiar with the conversations. In the same period, Trump has been sounding out associates on his campaign leadership and the possibility of making changes or bringing on additional advisers.

Budowich comes to Trump’s campaign after leading MAGA Inc., the main pro-Trump super PAC in recent years. Pfeiffer was communications director for the super PAC.

Bruesewitz is known for his large following on X, where he regularly churns out posts promoting Trump and attacks his political opponents.

Josh Dawsey contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

A lot has changed in the presidential race over the last three weeks, according to The Washington Post’s polling average.

Since President Joe Biden exited the presidential race on July 21 and passed the baton to Kamala Harris, his vice president, the race has effectively reversed itself. It is no exaggeration to state that Harris would be the favorite to win the White House, according to our polling model, if the presidential contest were held today.

Relative to the day that Biden dropped out, Harris has gained two percentage points nationally and, as of Sunday, leads in our national polling average. In swing states, she has gained an average of 2.1 points since June 21 and leads in 2 of 7 of them.

Harris has taken the lead in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, and has substantially closed the gap in Michigan, where Donald Trump now leads with less than one percentage point (if this trend continues, we’d expect our average to show a tie in that state in the coming days).

According to our polling model, Harris still trails Trump in the electoral college tally if the election were held today and every state votes as their polling average currently demonstrates. Nonetheless, she would be the favorite if voters today went to the polls because Harris now has more paths to the presidency than Donald Trump — that is, she is competitive in more states that could add up to 270 votes or an electoral college victory.

Our modeling shows that Harris has two paths to possible success: the Rust Belt states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania and the Sun Belt states of Georgia, Arizona and Nevada (she could win in either region and still claim the White House). Meanwhile, Trump must win both the Rust Belt and Sun Belt to triumph.

It is, of course, important to remember that there are still three months until Election Day and Harris has just recently become the Democratic presidential nominee. Polls are simply a snapshot in time and a lot can change between now and Election Day.

But there’s no question something big happened on July 21.

Before the June 27 debate, the presidential race was pretty easy to describe: Biden was behind, both nationally and in the swing states, but was very slowly clawing his way back into contention. In January of this year, Biden was behind Trump by 1.5 percentage points nationally, according to The Washington Post polling average, which we launched in June but also ran retrospectively. By mid-June, that deficit had shrunk to three-tenths of a percentage point.

What followed the debate were five of the most eventful weeks in recent political history. A catastrophic debate performance, an attempted assassination of a presidential candidate, a vice-presidential pick, the Republican National Convention and, most critically, Biden dropping out of the presidential election and endorsing Harris.

After the debate, Biden’s standing in the polls deteriorated pretty quickly. According to our polling average, Biden dropped by more than one percentage point nationally in just the week following the debate, erasing the progress he had made since the beginning of the year. But more importantly, Biden was behind in every single swing state.

After the debate, our polling average showed Biden’s position in the Sun Belt states deteriorating to the point that Trump was ahead by five percentage points in states like Georgia, Arizona, Nevada and North Carolina. In Michigan, Biden had slipped behind Trump by more than three percentage points.

But after Harris entered the race in late July, the election was effectively reset. Compared to other polling aggregators and models, The Post’s model took a bit longer to reflect the changes that came with Harris’s candidacy. That’s because we have chosen to use only the highest quality polls for our model, and not many polls that were released in the last few weeks met our standard.

According to our model now, Harris has become the slight favorite. Nonetheless, there are some caveats and cautionary notes — our polling model is only a snapshot in time and also, polls can err as we’ve seen in the last two presidential elections.

On the face of it, Harris’s small lead in the national polls and trends in swing states don’t look like enough for her to be the favorite in the electoral college. According to our model, Trump continues to lead in a majority of the battleground states — and if you count up the electoral votes and award them to the candidates leading in those states, Trump comes in at 283 and Harris at 255. The first to 270 wins.

The reason Harris is now the favorite is because Harris has closed the gap with Trump in Sun Belt states enough to open a second path to the presidency

Because the polls underestimated Trump in the last two presidential elections, we often associate polling errors with a potential upside for Republicans. But it’s important to remember that polling errors can go either way. And a 2012-sized error (not a cycle we usually associate with an error at all) would now be enough to put Harris over the top.

The other, and more crucial, reason that Harris is favored is that her improvement in the polls has opened up a second path on the presidential battlefield and in the electoral college. The polling suggests that, unlike Biden, she is no longer effectively tied to the Rust Belt — Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin — to hit 270 electoral votes. As of today, Harris is now only a typically sized polling error away from winning key Sun Belt states. Winning all of Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina and Georgia would also be enough to put Harris over the top and she is continuing to improve her position in those states.

Our model shows that for Trump to win the White House, he would need to notch victories in both the Rust Belt and Sun Belt. But crucially for Harris, she would win by taking just one of those two paths.

For now, that is a game changer.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

A large batch of polls this week confirmed Vice President Kamala Harris’s rise in the 2024 presidential race and suggests it has continued. She now leads in the majority of national polls.

There’s a lot to take in, so I thought it’s worth isolating a few findings that stand out to me.

1. Democrats’ big enthusiasm bump — and edge

It’s been evident for a while that Democrats have been injected with huge amounts of enthusiasm since Harris replaced President Joe Biden on the ticket. Call it “vibes” or something else; it’s real. Polls this week reflect that.

While a Monmouth University poll from June showed just 46 percent of Democrats said they were enthusiastic about a Trump-Biden rematch, that number has nearly doubled to 85 percent for the Trump-Harris race. Democrats’ enthusiasm leapfrogged Republicans, whose excitement stayed steady at 71 percent.

In other words, Democrats went from a 25-point enthusiasm deficit to a 14-point advantage, at least on this specific question. (Other polls have tested enthusiasm to vote, which is a somewhat different question, and the two parties have been closer.)

Also notable from the Monmouth poll: Nearly 9 in 10 Democrats say they’re optimistic about the election, compared with about three-quarters of Republicans.

And an AP-NORC poll this week showed that 63 percent of Democrats are excited about a potential Harris administration, compared with 57 percent of Republicans for another Trump administration.

2. Democrats could be getting a Senate bump, too

A big question has been how much Harris’s momentum might filter down to other Democrats this election year — particularly with both the House and Senate very much in play. It wasn’t guaranteed it would help, especially given that Senate Democrats were already overperforming Biden.

Well, we got a big new set of Senate polls from the Cook Political Report on Thursday, and they suggest the Democrats got a significant bump there, too.

Democrats improved their margins by an average of four points across five key Senate races: Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. They now lead in each race by at least seven points.

Democrats also flipped the generic ballot — where people are asked to choose between a generic Republican and a generic Democrat — in two other states that don’t feature a 2024 Senate race: Georgia and North Carolina.

In total, Democrats actually gained more down ballot than they did in the presidential race in every state except Wisconsin.

We don’t have a ton of other new polls, but the ones we have do suggest some of these races have moved slightly in Democrats’ direction in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

I wrote in my newsletter Wednesday about whether Democrats can dream about actually holding on to the Senate, which will be very tough given how slanted the map is against them with the specific seats that are up in 2024. They basically need to sweep all the races mentioned above, and then some.

It’s worth awaiting more data. But these numbers have to tempt them to dream beyond just the presidential race.

3. The big Walz vs. Vance gap: 14 points

Republicans have exerted plenty of energy going after the new Democratic vice-presidential nominee, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D), for his record as governor, his military service and other issues. And they’ve had plenty to work with.

But for now, the latest polls show Walz is a popular running mate — and notably, significantly more popular than the GOP’s unpopular VP nominee, Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio).

The current FiveThirtyEight average shows Walz’s net image rating (favorable minus unfavorable) is five points positive, while Vance’s is nine points negative. That’s a 14-point gap.

Vance’s image has continued to decline in recent weeks, and a Fox News poll this week really highlighted the GOP’s problem. The poll was relatively good for Trump (showing him leading nationally by one point) but was one of Vance’s worst to date. It showed his image 13 points underwater: 38 percent favorable, compared with 51 percent unfavorable.

4. The ‘double-haters’ break for Harris

My colleague Philip Bump on Wednesday broke down the evolving picture with “double-haters,” or those who dislike both major-party candidates.

The top finding from the Monmouth poll is that they are a shrinking group, declining by about half since Harris’s entry into the race. While about 1 in 5 voters were double-haters before — a historically high number — it’s now about 1 in 10.

Perhaps more important is the big reason for that decline: A lot of them like Harris. And they’re now ready to vote for her.

Among voters who still dislike both Trump and Biden, 53 percent say they’re voting for Harris, while just 11 percent say they’re voting for Trump.

Previously, those double-haters had been more evenly split between Trump and Biden. Harris winning them over is a big boost for her.

5. Other states could come into play

For almost the entirety of the 2024 campaign, we’ve been focused on a static array of swing states and Senate races. But it’s fair to ask whether we should widen our gaze a bit.

A couple of states that new polls suggest we should keep an eye on:

  • North Carolina, which has been regarded as a perhaps unlikely Democratic target. The Cook poll showed Harris leading there by one point (within the margin of error). We don’t have much high-quality recent polling, but the polls we do have show a tight race. And Biden lost the state only by a little more than a point in 2020.
  • Florida, where polls in recent days have shown Harris within two to five points. Also, on the Senate front, a Suffolk University poll this week showed Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) 14 points underwater (35 percent favorable versus 49 percent unfavorable), even as other Republicans including Trump were in positive territory. Scott’s advantage on the ballot has been similar to Trump’s.
This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

The Secret Service has approved a new security plan to better protect former president Donald Trump at outdoor campaign events, including the use of bulletproof glass to shield him onstage, a Secret Service official confirmed.

The effort comes after the Secret Service urged the Trump campaign to temporarily pause having Trump appear at outdoor rallies, after a gunman fired multiple shots at the Republican nominee at an outdoor fairgrounds in Butler, Pa., on July 13.

Trump was wounded and has not appeared at an outdoor campaign event since the attempted assassination, which is considered the Secret Service’s most serious security failure since John Hinckley was able to shoot and nearly kill President Ronald Reagan outside a Washington hotel four decades ago.

The plan to erect bulletproof glass to surround Trump at outdoor events is a major enhancement in the Secret Service’s standard security planning for candidate campaign events, according to the Secret Service official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive security measures. Such sheets of ballistic glass are normally only provided for presidents and for vice presidents when deemed necessary at outdoor appearances, an extra layer of security organized and coordinated by the Department of Defense to shield the nation’s top two leaders. Vice President Kamala Harris, who is the Democratic nominee challenging Trump, would be given such protection if warranted, officials said.

The Defense Department partners with the Secret Service to bolster security for the sitting president and vice president, the official said, but does not help protect candidates for president. The Secret Service generally prefers indoor events for presidents and vice presidents, reducing the need for such glass.

“Former presidents and candidates don’t normally get bulletproof glass or support from DOD,” the official said. “This glass needs to be brought in on trucks and vans.”

With the goal of better protecting Trump, a Secret Service official said, the agency has begun positioning caches of ballistic glass around the country in various locations, where government personnel can easily access it for Trump campaign events.

The Secret Service will also be adding other technical security assets that have not normally been provided for presidential candidates, a Secret Service official confirmed, but they declined to describe those tools. These technical security measures could include the use of drones.

The Secret Service public affairs office declined to comment on the change. The new development involving the use of bulletproof glass was first reported this afternoon by ABC News.

Former Secret Service director Kimberly Cheatle had met with the Trump campaign in the wake of the July 13 shooting, recommending he temporarily stop holding outdoor events and proposing the agency craft a new security plan for his campaign appearances.

Trump has wanted to do at least some outdoor rallies again, including one in Butler, Pa., Trump aides told The Washington Post. Advisers have not finalized a date, and the service has asked for several weeks to plan for any such event. But Trump had made clear he did not want to go outside again without the protective glass, an adviser said.

Cheatle resigned a day after she testified before Congress about the shooting, amid bipartisan calls among lawmakers for her resignation and broad internal agency disappointment with her leadership and handling of the crisis. Acting head of the Secret Service, Ronald Rowe Jr., continued and finalized the new security plans for Trump and use of ballistic glass and other measures, an official said.

Trump’s campaign team is still eyeing indoor venues for many of his campaign events, out of an abundance of caution, according to Trump advisers. These advisers have told The Post they think indoor events will create fewer challenges for creating a security bubble around Trump.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

LARGO, Md. — President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris, touting their efforts to lower prescription drug prices for Medicare recipients, hosted their first joint appearance since Biden ended his reelection bid, a policy event that quickly took on the tone and feel of a campaign rally.

Biden and Harris announced agreements on lower drug costs for the first 10 medications selected under a Medicare price negotiation program, including those that treat diabetes, blood clots, heart failure, rheumatoid arthritis and blood cancers.

“As vice president — together with Joe Biden, our president — we’ve finally addressed the long-standing issue that for years was one of the biggest challenges on this subject, which is that Medicare was prohibited by law from negotiating lower drug prices, and that cost was passed on to our seniors,” Harris said. “But not anymore.”

The appearance was billed as an official White House policy event, but it had clear political implications, and Biden leaned into them from the first minute of his remarks. “Folks, I have an incredible partner in the progress we’ve made,” he said, adding, “She’s going to make one hell of a president.”

Harris, for her part, spent much of her speech heaping praise on Biden and his leadership. “I can speak all afternoon about the person that I am standing on the stage with,” she said. “There’s a lot of love in this room for our president, and I think it’s for many, many reasons.”

As the crowd chanted, “Thank you, Joe,” the president brought his hand to his chest and nodded.

The event reflected a complex political moment for the Democratic leaders, as Biden seeks to burnish his legacy while also boosting Harris, and Harris seeks to make the case for her candidacy while honoring Biden. The crowd’s preference was clear, as cheers erupted every time Harris’s name was mentioned, while several dozen attendees sought to leave about 15 minutes into Biden’s remarks.

Among the speakers was Maryland Gov. Wes Moore. “You’re going to hear not just from the 46th president of the United States, Joe Biden, you’re also about to hear from the 47th president of the United States, Kamala Harris,” he said, prompting sustained cheers and screams. The community college venue where the event was held was packed in a way that Biden’s events have rarely been.

Turning to the reason for the event, Biden said he had been fighting since 1973, his first year in the Senate, to give Medicare the authority to negotiate drug prices. If Republicans regained the White House, he added, they would undo the progress his administration had made.

“We finally beat Big Pharma,” he said. “And, might I add, with not one Republican vote in the entire Congress.”

The Inflation Reduction Act, passed in 2022 with Harris casting the tiebreaking vote in the Senate, gave the secretary of health and human services for the first time the power to negotiate with pharmaceutical companies over Medicare drug prices. The administration reported Thursday that the program has resulted in about $6 billion in initial savings.

Biden stressed that Project 2025 — a conservative policy blueprint created for the next GOP administration, which Republican nominee Donald Trump has tried to distance himself from — would strip away Medicare’s ability to negotiate drug prices. “Let me tell you what our 2025 plan is: Beat the hell out of them,” he said.

Harris’s month-old campaign has so far focused on a broad, uplifting message about building a better future, arguing that Trump and Republicans want to take America backward.

Her critics, most notably Trump himself, accuse of her of leaning into partisan rhetoric and the good vibes of a reset campaign while avoiding the details of what she would actually do as president. Harris has not sat down for a formal press interview or news conference, limiting interactions with the media to off-the-record conversations and quick, informal exchanges with reporters.

“We actually have the plans, we have the policies, to accomplish this stuff — that’s a big thing that sets us apart from Kamala Harris and Tim Walz,” Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), Trump’s running mate, said at an event in Pittsburgh earlier in the day.

Thursday’s event was in part a response to such criticism, as Harris spoke in detail about the results of a key administration policy. On Friday, she is expected to begin rolling out her own proposals with a speech on the economy, including a plan to ban “price gouging” for food items amid widespread consumer unhappiness over inflation.

Still, detailed policy proposals often come with political risk. Opponents, journalists and even allies will pore over the details of the proposals, looking for negative economic ramifications, unintended consequences and contradictions with Harris’s past stances. Harris will have to publicly defend her policies, including at a Sept. 10 debate between her and Trump.

In an early sign of the back-and-forth to come, Trump hastily scheduled a news conference at his golf club in Bedminster, N.J., for shortly after the Biden and Harris event. He told reporters that some of Harris’s proposals were “communist price controls” that would wreck the economy.

“She wants price controls,” he said in his remarks, which focused on what he described as negative economic indicators since Biden took office, especially inflation. “And if they worked, I’d go along with that. I’d be all for that, but they don’t work. They actually have the exact opposite effect and impact. It leads to food shortages, rationing, hunger, dramatically more inflation.”

As an opening salvo for Harris’s policy rollouts, Democrats see the price reductions on drugs as a potentially winning issue for their candidates across the country, but they face the challenge that few voters know about the issue and the impact of the price cuts will not be felt for years to come.

Democrats have sought to reduce the cost of drug prices in the Medicare program for more than 30 years. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), a former presidential candidate, has campaigned on the issue. But the effort faced immense resistance from a pharmaceutical industry with deep pockets, whose representatives argued that forcing down prices would stifle innovation.

The Biden administration said Thursday the renegotiation will reduce the amount of money that many Medicare beneficiaries have to spend out of pocket. The new, negotiated prices ranged from 38 to 79 percent lower than the drugs’ list prices in 2023, they said, and the initiative is arguably the most significant health-care legislation in more than a decade, since the passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010.

But the new prices do not take effect until 2026, creating a challenge for Biden and Harris as they seek to make voters aware of major legislation that they say will help them save money.

For nine of the drugs, the negotiations help cut the price by more than 50 percent, officials said. Medicare beneficiaries in 2022 collectively spent $3.4 billion to cover out-of-pocket costs on those drugs, according to a federal analysis released last year. The drugs also represented about one-fifth of the Medicare prescription drug program’s total spending.

Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, said Medicare enrollees will save an estimated $1.5 billion in 2026, when the new prices take effect. “For so many people, being able to afford these drugs will mean the difference between debilitating illness and living full lives,” she said on a conference call with reporters.

Medicare plans to target 15 additional drugs for negotiations in 2025 and 2026, and 20 drugs in the following years.

Thursday’s joint event offered Democrats an opportunity to use both the presidential bully pulpit and the spotlight from a national campaign to raise awareness of the issue. Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, are embarking on a bus tour through western Pennsylvania over the weekend and plan to hold a rally in Milwaukee next week, before appearing at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago.

All these events will probably give them further opportunities to stress the issue of drug costs. Biden also frequently touts his measure capping insulin costs for Medicare patients at $35 a month, another program that Harris and Walz are likely to highlight.

Biden, 81, announced late last month that he would not seek reelection to a second term, following a presidential debate with Trump during which he repeatedly stumbled and sometimes had difficulty finishing his sentences.

Biden had been crisscrossing the country to prove that he is up for four more years, but since he stepped aside, he has significantly scaled back his public travel schedule. It remains to be seen how much he will campaign for Harris and how effective a messenger he will be.

The campaign has said that Biden will campaign at some point for Harris in Pennsylvania with Gov. Josh Shapiro, but Biden will not be present on Harris’s bus tour in advance of the convention.

The president will speak at the convention Monday night, and Harris is scheduled to deliver her acceptance speech Thursday, the event’s final night.

Dan Diamond and Meryl Kornfield contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

In this video from StockCharts TV, Julius assesses various rotations using Relative Rotation Graphs, starting at asset class level and then moving to sectors. Julius zooms in on the industries of two sectors to get an idea of where pockets of out-performance may exist in the current market. He then gives his two cents on the potential developments for the S&P 500 using the chart of SPY.

This video was originally broadcast on August 13, 2024. Click anywhere on the icon above to view on our dedicated page for Julius.

Past episodes of Julius’ shows can be found here.

#StayAlert, -Julius

In this exclusive StockCharts TV video, Joe shows the four stages a stock or market can be in at any time. He explains each stage and how ADX & Volatility can help define each stage. He then shows what stage the SPY is right and why the bias is still positive. From there, Joe shares a pullback screen in StockCharts and then goes through the 11 sector SPDRs to show the shifts that are taking place. Finally, he goes through the symbol requests that came through, including META, SBUX, and more.

This video was originally published on August 14, 2024. Click this link to watch on StockCharts TV.

Archived videos from Joe are available at this link. Send symbol requests to stocktalk@stockcharts.com; you can also submit a request in the comments section below the video on YouTube. Symbol Requests can be sent in throughout the week prior to the next show.

In this edition of StockCharts TV‘s The Final Bar, Dave shows how breadth conditions have evolved so far in August, highlights the renewed strength in the financial sector with a focus on insurance stocks, and describes how the action so far in Q3 could be forming a potential head-and-shoulders pattern for semiconductors!

See Dave’s chart comparing Bullish Percent Indexes for $SPX vs. $NDX here.

This video originally premiered on August 14, 2024. Watch on our dedicated Final Bar page on StockCharts TV!

New episodes of The Final Bar premiere every weekday afternoon. You can view all previously recorded episodes at this link.

German authorities have issued an international arrest warrant for a Ukrainian man suspected of carrying out the explosions that damaged the Nord Stream gas pipeline two years ago.

The explosions left gas billowing from Nord Stream 1 and 2 – two major conduits that transported Russian gas to Europe – and prompted a huge operation to find who was responsible.

A spokeswoman for Poland’s Public Prosecutors Office, Anna Adamiak, confirmed Poland had received a warrant from Germany seeking the arrest of a Ukrainian man, named as Volodymyr Z. Reuters, citing Polish prosecutors, said he was able to leave Polish territory as German authorities had not included him on a database of wanted people.

The news comes after three German outlets reported that the man – described as a male diver – along with two other Ukrainian suspects, are believed by German federal prosecutors to have launched an audacious underwater attack on the pipeline from a sailing boat in September 2022.

The origin of the explosions has been a subject of intense speculation and further stoked political tensions in Europe seven months after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Neither of the pipelines were actively transporting gas to Europe at the time of the leaks, though they still held gas under pressure.

Investigators found evidence of explosives at the sites in November 2022, leading Swedish prosecutors to conclude that the blasts were caused by an act of sabotage.

According to the new German media reports, investigators in Germany believe that the sailing boat set sail from Rostock, Germany in September 2022, stopping in Denmark, Sweden and Poland, with a six-person crew including five men and one woman.

During that voyage, the crew is reportedly suspected of diving into the Baltic Sea and attaching explosives to the massive Nord Stream pipelines, which subsequently detonated and damaged both lines, according to the outlets.

The New York Times meanwhile reported in 2023 that intelligence reviewed by US officials suggested a group loyal to Ukraine, but acting independently of the government in Kyiv, were involved in the operation.

Ukraine’s government has always denied any involvement in the blasts.

The Nord Stream project had been controversial long before Russia invaded Ukraine. Several Western countries, among them Poland, raised fears it would increase Moscow’s influence over Europe.

Germany nonetheless championed the expensive multimillion dollar, 750-mile second pipeline, before eventually pulling the plug on the plans after Russia’s invasion, just as it was set to become operational.

This story has been updated with additional information.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

The last operating public hospital in Sudan’s North Darfur state is at risk of closure, Doctors Without Borders (MSF) warned Wednesday, amid fierce fighting between the country’s rival military factions that have left more than 18,000 people dead and 33,000 injured.

Civil war between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) broke out in April last year and has intensified in El Fasher, the North Darfur capital, since May when the paramilitary RSF group encircled the city.

The MSF-supported Saudi Hospital in El Fasher has suffered extensive damage following the continued bombardment of the city over the last week, leaving it barely functional, MSF said. At least 15 people were killed in those attacks and more than 130 others were wounded, it added.

The facility is the last remaining public hospital in the city with the capacity to treat the wounded and perform surgery, according to MSF.

On Sunday, another attack on the hospital hit the surgical ward, killing a patient carer and injuring five others.

“Sunday’s attack on Saudi Hospital – which is the largest hospital in North Darfur state – makes it crystal clear that the warring parties are making no efforts to protect health facilities or the civilians inside them. Patients fear for their lives as a result of the relentless attacks,” Michel Olivier Lacharité, head of MSF’s emergency operations, said in a statement Wednesday.

As people flee to the Zamzam camp for displaced people near El Fasher in western Sudan, which was hit by shelling one week ago, MSF’s field hospital is under “exceptional pressure” with casualties continuing to arrive, the aid agency said.

Crisis facing children

The latest dire reports from El Fasher come as UNICEF, the UN’s children’s agency, said Sudan’s humanitarian crisis was “the biggest in the world” for children, by numbers.

“Tens of thousands” of Sudanese children are at risk of death if action is not urgently taken, UNICEF spokesperson James Elder warned at a press briefing on Tuesday.

“Thousands of children have been killed or injured in Sudan’s war. Sexual violence and recruitment are increasing. And the situation is even worse where an ongoing humanitarian presence remains denied,” Elder said.

Five million children have been forced to flee their homes, making Sudan the world’s largest child displacement crisis, Elder stressed, adding that children are dying as famine starts to take hold in the Zamzam camp.

“This month’s determination of famine in one part of Sudan risks spreading and leading to a catastrophic loss of children’s lives,” the spokesman said.

This post appeared first on cnn.com