Author

admin

Browsing

CHICAGO — In one of his last major appearances before he leaves office in five months, President Joe Biden formally passed the torch to his vice president, Kamala Harris, as a packed convention hall screamed and chanted in adulation for a prolonged stretch as he took the stage Monday night.

For about five minutes after Biden appeared just before 11:30 p.m. Eastern time, thousands of delegates and supporters cheered for him in a show of thanks for the decades he has served in public office. Convention organizers handed out “We love Joe” signs before the president’s speech, which the crowd held up and chanted in addition to “Thank you, Joe.”

Biden’s daughter, Ashley, introduced him, and he dabbed tears from his eyes as he took the stage and embraced her. First lady Jill Biden, who spoke shortly before her husband, also teared up and appeared visibly emotional throughout the final portion of the evening, including during the sustained standing ovation the president received — along with second gentleman Doug Emhoff and Gwen Walz, wife of Democratic vice-presidential contender Tim Walz.

“I love you all, folks,” Biden said. “And America, I love you.”

Biden opened his speech by rallying the crowd for Harris, in a bittersweet moment that marks the unofficial end of his half-century in politics. He then turned to what he and other Democrats have characterized as the historic nature of his presidency, including multiple pieces of consequential legislation that passed under his leadership — at one point reminding the audience that Harris served as the tiebreaking vote on many of those bills, seeking to prop her up even as he celebrated his own accomplishments.

“Let me ask you: Are you ready to vote for freedom?” Biden asked at the opening of his speech. “Are you ready to vote for democracy and for America? Let me ask you: Are you ready to vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz as president and vice president of the United States?”

Biden’s speech late Monday capped a remarkable two months in American politics, one in which a dismal debate performance pushed many Democrats to question the president’s ability to beat Republican nominee Donald Trump and ended in his stunning decision one month ago to exit the race. Rather than accepting his party’s nomination this week, Biden instead headlined the opening night of a historic convention that will see the Democratic Party nominate the first woman of color to lead its ticket.

While the rest of the week will look ahead to the momentous occasion of nominating Harris, Monday night in many ways was a tribute to the Democratic leaders who paved the way for her.

Biden, who spoke for more than 45 minutes in an energetic and animated speech, took a sort of victory lap over his four years in office and sought to cement his legacy. He also spoke of the work that still lies ahead: supporting Ukraine against its invasion of Russia; securing a cease-fire and hostage release deal between Israel and Hamas to end the devastating war in Gaza; and bringing home wrongfully detained Americans.

At many points, Biden spoke angrily about the threats he said Trump posed, including to American democracy and international alliances. His speech was frequently interrupted by chants from the audience.

At several points, when enthusiastic delegates chanted “thank you, Joe,” Biden would add: “And thank you, Kamala.”

The president also sought to dispel any notion that he was angry about having to step out of the presidential race when his intention was always to seek a second term.

“You see, it’s been the honor of my lifetime to serve as your president. I love the job, but I love my country more,” Biden said. “And all this talk about how I’m angry [at] all those people who said I should step down — that’s not true.”

At one point, a small group of delegates protesting Biden’s handling of Israel’s war in Gaza sought to stage a demonstration during his speech, holding up a banner that read “stop arming Israel.” But delegates quickly blocked them with “We heart Joe” signs and drowned them out.

Earlier in the evening, former secretary of state Hillary Clinton, the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee, celebrated the various women who preceded her and Harris, marking the historic nature of Harris’s nomination and the echoes between her role and Harris’s. Eight years ago, it was Clinton who headlined a triumphant Democratic convention and appeared poised to be the nation’s first woman president, only to lose to Trump in a race that devastated the party.

“Afterwards, we refused to give up on America,” Clinton said, speaking of the ensuing years. “We marched, many ran for office, and we kept our eyes on the future. Well, my friends, the future is here.”

She added, “Together we put a lot of cracks in the highest, hardest glass ceiling. And tonight, we are so close to breaking through once and for all.”

Numerous speakers who appeared before Biden reflected on his presidency and his “selfless” decision in exiting the presidential race to make way for Harris, a younger, more energetic candidate whom most Democrats feel has a better chance of defeating Trump.

Biden had come under unrelenting pressure from Democrats to step aside after his June 27 debate performance against Trump that, for many in his party, renewed questions about his ability to defeat the former president and potentially his fitness for a second term. The president bitterly fought leaders of his party for more than three weeks, insisting he was best positioned to beat Trump, before deciding to drop his reelection bid on July 21.

Clinton also joined the other speakers in expressing gratitude for Biden’s record.

“Let’s salute President Biden,” Clinton said. “He has been democracy’s champion at home and abroad. He brought dignity, decency and confidence back to the White House. And he showed what it means to be a true patriot. Thank you, Joe Biden, for your lifetime of service and leadership.”

Jill Biden took the stage shortly before her husband appeared, citing the times he had comforted grieving people he met on the campaign trail or stopped to encourage a child who suffered from a stutter. Saying Biden knows that America’s greatness comes in part from small acts of kindness, she added, “Kamala Harris knows that, too.”

Harris herself also made a brief surprise appearance early in the proceedings, to a rapturous reception from the crowd.

The vice president emphasized that she wanted to “celebrate our incredible president, Joe Biden.” She added, “Joe, thank you for your historic leadership, your lifetime of service to our nation, and all you will continue to do.”

The first night of the Democratic convention featured a conscious show of traditional patriotism, with American flags on display throughout the United Center and the waving of “USA” signs that were distributed to the thousands of delegates. Some of the speakers were greeted with chants of “USA” as they took the stage, an echo of the recent Olympic Games.

Monday’s speakers also leaned heavily into Trump’s criminal conviction for falsifying business records, seeking to position the race as one between a former prosecutor and a felon. When Clinton noted that Trump would be the first felon to run for president, the crowd began chanting, “Lock him up” — a striking moment for a woman who endured “Lock her up” chants from Trump crowds in the 2016 campaign.

But for all the praise of Biden, many of those celebrating his presidency — when he passed numerous pieces of consequential legislation long sought by Democrats and led the U.S. response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — are the same people who pressured him to leave the race even as he resisted.

Convention organizers have sought to strike a delicate balance between celebrating what many Democrats see as Biden’s historic presidency and his more than 50 years in politics, and maintaining the jubilant energy and excitement that has surrounded Harris’s sudden ascension to the top of the ticket when Biden stepped aside.

While Biden knows his legacy is directly tied to Harris’s ability to beat Trump in November, the rapid enthusiasm that Harris has generated has created a bittersweet mix of emotions for the president, according to people close to the president, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private dynamics.

Biden has made peace with his decision, these associates say, even if he still harbors some resentment toward those who he feels abandoned him when he was convinced he could defeat Trump. The president and his circle believe he was wounded politically not just by his debate performance, but by the ensuing weeks of second-guessing from leaders of his own party.

Toward the end of his speech, Biden promised to be “the best volunteer Harris and Walz have ever seen.” He ended by reflecting on all he had given the country and what it meant to him.

“America, I gave my best to you. I made a lot of mistakes in my career. But I gave my best to you for 50 years,” Biden said. “I’ve been too young to be in the Senate because I wasn’t yet 30, and too old to stay as president. But I hope you know how grateful I am to all of you.”

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

CHICAGO — Welcome to The Campaign Moment, your guide to the biggest developments in the 2024 election, where the Democratic National Convention so far is largely about Donald Trump.

(Make sure you are subscribed to this newsletter here. You can also hear my analysis weekly on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.)

The big moment

The convention kicked off Monday with President Joe Biden speaking approximately 72 hours earlier than he and we would have expected a month ago. (The new nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris, speaks Thursday.)

Former secretary of state and former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton also spoke, and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) delivered a barn-burner.

But they weren’t the only stars of the show. So too was Trump, whose name was uttered more than 150 times and who was frequently featured in video packages.

Below are some takeaways from Night 1.

1. Biden’s big send-off

Democrats were pulled in two directions at the end of Monday’s program. On the one hand, they wanted to send Biden off with a moment he could be proud of and a focus on his legacy; on the other, this convention is about the race ahead, and Biden is an unpopular president.

So Biden’s swan song sought to thread the needle between promoting his own record and framing up the 2024 race. Biden went into extensive detail about his proudest accomplishments, while interspersing attacks on Trump and playing up Harris’s contributions. And he sought to downplay any hard feelings about being ushered out of the race.

“Because of you, we’ve had one of the most extraordinary four years of progress ever, period,” Biden said. “When I saw ‘we,’ I mean Kamala and me.”

Biden mentioned Harris’s help in capping insulin at $35 a month and passing a significant gun safety bill. He talked about working on reopening schools and businesses with Harris. He noted she cast a key tie-breaking vote in the Senate on prescription drugs.

The speech was otherwise a mostly standard-issue campaign address lined with Biden’s accomplishments. But the crowd clearly made an effort to show Biden gratitude.

Biden entered the stage while dabbing at his eyes after being introduced by his daughter, Ashley Biden. The crowd applauded for minutes, chanting “Thank you, Joe.”

And Biden didn’t shy away from the elephant in the room.

“I love the job, but I love my country more,” Biden said, before adding: “And all this talk about how I’m angry at all those people who said I should step down, that’s not true. I love my country more. And we need to preserve our democracy in 2024.”

Perhaps the biggest applause line came near the end.

“America, America, I gave my best to you,” Biden said. “I made a lot of mistakes in my career. But I gave my best to you for 50 years.

2. Ocasio-Cortez’s coming out party

If there’s to be a lasting moment from a politician in Monday’s program — beyond Biden’s de facto farewell after a lifetime in politics — it’s likely to be Ocasio-Cortez’s rousing speech.

Ocasio-Cortez cast Trump as no ally of working people, saying he would “sell this country for a dollar if it meant lining his own pockets and greasing the palms of his Wall Street friends.”

She targeted Republicans who like to attack her for being a former bartender. She said she would be happy to go back to that occupation “any day of the week, because there is nothing wrong with working for a living.”

The crowd absolutely ate it up. It seemed to be the moment that Ocasio-Cortez completed her journey from left-wing “Squad” provocateur — and a thorn in the side to her party’s leaders in the past — to being a bona fide Democratic establishment star.

It wouldn’t be surprising to see clips of the speech for years to come.

3. Abortion and covid feature prominently

Perhaps the two most notable attacks on Trump on Monday night involved abortion and the coronavirus.

The program in primetime featured three women who faced arduous circumstances related to abortion. One was a rape survivor whose stepfather impregnated her when she was 12; another waited three days for an abortion for a nonviable pregnancy; another was turned away from emergency rooms despite miscarrying. The latter two stories involved severe pain.

The rape survivor, Hadley Duvall, noted Trump has called the patchwork of state abortion laws “a beautiful thing.”

“What is so beautiful about a child having to carry her parent’s child?” Duvall said.

Abortion bans are a major liability for the GOP right now. Trump has sought to emphasize states’ rights and leave it at that. But the program emphasized how far red states have taken things after Trump-nominated justices overturned Roe v. Wade.

(Duvall’s pregnancy pre-dated the end of Roe, but Kentucky doesn’t currently have a rape exception in its abortion ban.)

The pandemic was a more surprising focus — but also one with a personal touch. Speakers spoke about Trump’s lack of leadership, his efforts to downplay the threat and his conspiracy theories. And more than one speaker spoke from the heart as the relative of someone who died.

Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) mentioned the deaths of his health-care-worker mother and stepfather and added, “When Donald Trump and his MAGA extremists like Marjorie Taylor Greene downplayed the horror of the pandemic, it should make us all furious.”

An emotional Minnesota Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan (D) spoke of her brother’s death and said, “Our communities were suffering. Our economy was struggling. And Donald Trump was playing games. Our country was brought to the brink by his failure to respond.”

Covid was a significant liability for Trump when he left office, with a poll showing Americans disapproved of his handling of it 63 percent to 34 percent.

4. Few signs of major divisions so far

The move from Biden to Harris has been about as seamless as Democrats could have hoped, and enthusiasm is off the charts. But a big question this week is whether any divisions might emerge in the bright spotlight.

So far, there’s little sign of that — even aside from Biden’s speech.

Pro-Palestinian protests near the convention loom, particularly with organizers suggesting tens of thousands would show up. But the actual turnout thus far appears quite a bit lower.

A small group of the protesters briefly broke away from a planned march Monday, creating a tense standoff with police. Some apparently uncommitted delegates unfurled a banner during Biden’s speech. And Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.), meanwhile, suggested Harris should be unafraid to differentiate herself from Biden’s long-standing pro-Israel stance.

There is also some question about whether there might be any hard feelings about the very public effort to nudge Biden aside.

A leader of that effort, former House speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), had some blunt comments for anyone looking backward. She said on CNN on Monday that if people are upset, “I’m sorry for them. But the country is very happy … I don’t know who they are, but, you know, that’s their problem, not mine.”

The Democratic Party is indeed very happy. And polls suggest few harbor ill feelings about the switch. A poll shortly after Biden dropped out showed just 4 percent of Democrats strongly opposed it.

5. An attack is born: “Trump’s a scab”

Trump has sought to appeal to labor unions, even featuring Teamsters President Sean O’Brien prominently at the Republican National Convention last month.

But a comment Trump made last week on the subject led to one of the biggest rallying cries Monday night. And it would seem likely to feature plenty moving forward.

During an X event last week, Trump praised Elon Musk for firing striking workers. The comment drew O’Brien (who hadn’t endorsed Trump despite his speaking slot) to accuse Trump of “economic terrorism.”

United Auto Workers president Shawn Fain spoke Monday night and unveiled a red t-shirt that read, “Trump is a scab. Vote Harris.” The crowd responded by lustily chanting, “Trump’s a scab! Trump’s a scab!”

Ocasio-Cortez spoke right after Fain and called Trump “a two-bit union buster.”

Labor union members have drifted somewhat toward Trump, making Trump’s comment low-hanging fruit for Democrats.

Take a moment to read:

  • “FBI concludes Iran tried to hack campaigns of Trump, Biden-Harris” (Washington Post)
  • “With false ‘coup’ claims, Trump primes supporters to challenge a Harris win” (Washington Post)
  • “Harris holds slight national lead over Trump, Post-ABC-Ipsos poll finds” (Washington Post)
  • “Trump campaign attempts to reset with candidate who sometimes has his own plans” (Washington Post)
  • “Trump’s ‘the media fakes poll results’ attack makes no sense” (Washington Post)
  • “How Democrats Reversed the Script on the GOP” (Politico)
  • “Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris: Inside Their Quietly Close Bond” (New York Times)
This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

The first night of the 2024 Democratic National Convention featured many attacks on former president Donald Trump, some of which quoted him out of context. Here’s a roundup of a dozen claims that caught our attention, in the order in which they were made.

As is our practice, we do not award Pinocchios for a roundup of statements made during convention events.

“We tried to expand Social Security and Medicare. Donald Trump tried to cut them year after year after year.”

—Rep. Lauren Underwood (D-Ill.)

This is mostly false. Earlier on this first day of the convention, we awarded the Harris-Walz campaign Three Pinocchios for a version of this claim.

On Medicare, virtually all anticipated savings sought by Trump would have been wrung from health providers, not Medicare beneficiaries, as a way of holding down costs and improving the solvency of the old-age health program. Trump, in fact, borrowed many proposals from Barack Obama, who had failed to get them through Congress.

Marc Goldwein, senior vice president at the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, which seeks to lower the budget deficit, closely studied the Trump proposals each year.

“The basic argument here is quite ridiculous,” he said of the Harris-Walz campaign tweet. Goldwein noted that the Inflation Reduction Act, in which Harris cast the tiebreaking vote for passage, also reduced health-care costs for Medicare, such as through inflation caps. “By the same logic, you could say Joe Biden cut Medicare.”

As for Social Security, Trump kept his promise not to touch retirement benefits, bucking longtime efforts by Republicans to raise the retirement age. But Trump did seek, without success, to reduce spending for Social Security Disability Insurance as well as Supplemental Security Income, which is administered by the Social Security Administration.

Goldwein said that the reductions generally were intended to make the programs more efficient, such as eliminating double payments of both unemployment insurance and disability (also sought by Obama). He also said the proposals were relatively small.

Trump has insisted he will not cut benefits for Medicare or Social Security if he is elected president again.

“He [Trump] told us to inject bleach into our bodies.”

—Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.)

This is exaggerated. Trump did not say people should inject bleach into their bodies. Instead, at a pandemic briefing in 2020, he spoke confusingly of an “injection inside” of lungs with a disinfectant. He made the remarks after an aide presented a study showing how bleach could kill the virus when it remained on surfaces. Trump later claimed he was speaking “sarcastically,” though he seemed serious at the time.

Readers can judge for themselves. Here are his full remarks on April 23 that year: “I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in one minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning, because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it’d be interesting to check that, so that you’re going to have to use medical doctors with, but it sounds interesting to me.”

“When Donald Trump was president, corporate America ran wild. Donald Trump did not bring back the auto industry. When Donald Trump was president, auto plants closed. Trump did nothing.”

—Shawn Fain, United Auto Workers president

This is exaggerated. Trump often falsely bragged that before he became president, no new auto plants had been built for decades, but there were some new plants built during his presidency. Until the pandemic, Trump’s overall record on auto industry jobs was pretty good. From February 2017 to February 2020, just before the pandemic crashed the U.S. economy, Bureau of Labor Statistics data shows a gain of 34,100 auto manufacturing jobs and 36,400 auto retail jobs — for a total of more than 70,000 jobs in three years.

She [Kamala Harris] won’t be sending love letters to dictators.”

—Former secretary of state and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton

There is no evidence that Trump sent such letters. Clinton is making a bit of a leap to suggest that Trump has written “love letters” to dictators.

Clinton appears to be referring to a 2018 comment from Trump about North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un: “We fell in love, okay? No, really, he wrote me beautiful letters, and they’re great letters. We fell in love.”

That’s certainly an unusual statement, but he’s referring to letters written by Kim. We do not know what Trump wrote to Kim — or other dictators, for that matter.

Former national security adviser John Bolton, in his tell-all memoir, “The Room Where It Happened,” described one of Kim’s letters as “pure puffery, written probably by some clerk in North Korea’s agitprop bureau, but Trump loved it.” After another such letter, Trump even mused that he wanted to invite Kim to the White House — what Bolton called a “potential disaster of enormous magnitude.”

“It has to be some form of punishment for the woman. Yeah, there has to be some form.”

—Trump, quoted in a DNC video

Trump quickly walked back this statement. This March 3, 2016, quote from Trump pops up in the video as a woman, Amanda Zurawski, describes how she was not able to seek an abortion in Texas after her water broke early and her pregnancy was no longer viable. “I was punished for three days, having to wait for either my baby to die or me to die, or both. I was stuck in this horrific hell of both, wanting to hear her heartbeat and also hoping I wouldn’t,” Zurawski said.

The juxtaposition might leave the impression that Trump still believes this. But he walked back the statement the same day he made it in a town hall.

“If Congress were to pass legislation making abortion illegal and the federal courts upheld this legislation, or any state were permitted to ban abortion under state and federal law, the doctor or any other person performing this illegal act upon a woman would be held legally responsible, not the woman,” Trump said in a statement. “The woman is a victim in this case as is the life in her womb.”

“JD Vance says women should stay in violent marriages, and that pregnancies resulting from rape are simply inconvenient.”

—Kentucky governor Andy Beshear

Vance has said his comments have been twisted by Democrats. Here they are in context so readers can make their own judgment.

Violent marriages. In a 2021 event Vance participated in at Pacifica Christian High School in California, concerning his book “Hillbilly Elegy,” the moderator asked Vance: “What is causing one generation to give up on fatherhood when the other one was so doggedly determined to stick it out even in tough times?”

Vance praised his grandparents, who raised him, for staying together, even though his grandmother once poured lighter fluid on his grandfather and struck a match after he came home drunk, he wrote in his book.

Vance said: “This is one of the great tricks that I think the sexual revolution pulled on the American populace, which is the idea that like, ‘Well, OK, these marriages were fundamentally, you know, they were maybe even violent, but certainly they were unhappy. And so getting rid of them and making it easier for people to shift spouses like they change their underwear, that’s going to make people happier in the long term.’ And maybe it worked out for the moms and dads, though I’m skeptical. But it really didn’t work out for the kids of those marriages.”

Inconvenience. In a 2021 interview Vance was asked whether laws should allow women to get abortions if they were victims of rape or incest.

“My view on this has been very clear and I think the question betrays a certain presumption that is wrong,” Vance replied. “It’s not whether a woman should be forced to bring a child to term, it’s whether a child should be allowed to live, even though the circumstances of that child’s birth are somehow inconvenient or a problem to the society. The question really, to me, is about the baby.”

“I ran for president in 2020 because of what I saw in Charlottesville in August of 2017 … When the president was asked what he thought had happened, Donald Trump said, and I quote, ‘there are very fine people on both sides.’ My God, that’s what he said. That is what he said and what he meant.”

—President Joe Biden

Trump’s meaning is in dispute. The march on Charlottesville by white supremacists in August 2017 — and President Trump’s response to it — was a central event of his presidency. Over the course of several days, Trump made a number of contradictory remarks, permitting both his supporters and foes to create their own version of what happened.

Biden has frequently claimed that Trump said the white supremacists were “very fine people.” But the reality is more complicated. Trump was initially criticized for not speaking more forcefully against the white nationalists on the day of the clashes, Aug. 12. Then, in an Aug. 14 statement, Trump actually condemned right-wing hate groups — “those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans.”

But Trump muddied the waters on Aug. 15, a day later, by also saying: “You had people — and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists — because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists.” It was in this news conference that he said: “You had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides.”

Trump added: “There were people in that rally — and I looked the night before — if you look, there were people protesting very quietly the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee. I’m sure in that group there were some bad ones.”

The problem for Trump is that there was no evidence of anyone other than neo-Nazis and white supremacists in the Friday night rally on Aug. 11. He asserted there were people who were not alt-right who were “very quietly” protesting the removal of Lee’s statue.

It’s possible Trump became confused and was really referring to the Saturday rallies. But that’s also wrong. A Fact Checker examination of videos and testimony about the Saturday rallies found that there were white supremacists, there were counterprotesters — and there were heavily armed anti-government militias who showed up on Saturday.

The evidence shows there were no quiet protesters against removing the statue that weekend.

“[We’re] removing every lead pipe from schools and homes so every child can drink clean water.”

—Biden

This is exaggerated. Biden secured $15 billion through the bipartisan infrastructure law for lead pipe replacement. But the Environmental Protection Agency has projected that replacing the nearly 10 million lead pipes that supply U.S. homes with drinking water could cost at least $45 billion.

“More children in America are killed by a gunshot than any other cause in the United States more die from a bullet than cancer, accidents or anything else in the United States of America.”

—Biden

This is not quite right. Biden is using a statistic on gun deaths of “children and teens,” meaning it includes deaths of 18- and 19-year-olds, who are legally considered adults in most states. When you focus only on children — 17 and younger — motor vehicle deaths (broadly defined) still rank No. 1, as they have for six decades, though the gap is rapidly closing. Deaths of children from gun violence have increased about 50 percent from 2019 to 2021, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data shows.

“We know from his own chief of staff, four-star General John Kelly, that Trump while in Europe would not go to the gravesites in France of the brave service members who gave their lives in this country, he called them ‘suckers and losers.’ ”

—Biden

Kelly did not exactly say this. Trump, on repeated occasions, had vehemently denied this story. In 2023, however, John F. Kelly, Trump’s White House chief of staff in 2018 — who had previously not commented on the controversy — issued a statement to CNN that Trump “rants that our most precious heroes who gave their lives in America’s defense are ‘losers’ and wouldn’t visit their graves in France.”

Note that Kelly’s statement is carefully worded and does not directly say Trump refused to visit the graves because he thought they were losers, as Biden claimed. He says Trump thinks war dead are losers and he did not want to go to the cemetery. Both could be true — but not connected.

“We have a thousand billionaires in America. You know what is their average tax rate they pay? 8.2 percent.”

—Biden

Biden is comparing apples and oranges. We’ve given the president two Pinocchios for this claim.

The “lower tax rate” refers to a 2021 White House study concluding that the 400 wealthiest taxpayers paid an effective tax rate of 8 percent. But that estimate included unrealized gains in the income calculation. That’s not how the tax laws work. People are taxed on capital gains when they sell their stocks or other assets. So this is only a figure for a hypothetical tax system.

According to IRS data on the top 0.001 percent — 1,475 taxpayers with at least $77 million in adjusted gross income in 2020 — the average tax rate was 23.7 percent. The top 1 percent of taxpayers (income of at least $548,000) paid nearly 26 percent.

“Donald Trump says he will refuse to accept the election result if he loses again … He’s probably seeing a bloodbath if he loses — in his words.”

—Biden

Trump is being quoted out of context. Biden suggests Trump said there would be a “bloodbath” if he lost the election. But in a March 16 rally, Trump used the word when talking about the impact of Chinese electric vehicles on the U.S. auto industry.

“China now is building a couple of massive plants where they’re going to build the cars in Mexico and think, they think, that they’re going to sell those cars into the United States with no tax at the border,” Trump said. “We’re going to put a 100 percent tariff on every single car that comes across the line, and you’re not going to be able to sell those cars. If I get elected. Now, if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath, for the whole — that’s going to be the least of it. It’s going to be a bloodbath for the country. That’ll be the least of it. But they’re not going to sell those cars.”

The Trump campaign noted that one of the definitions of “bloodbath,” in the Merriam-Webster dictionary, is “a major economic disaster.” It also means “a notably fierce, violent, or destructive contest or struggle.”

Trump, of course, frequently quotes his opponents out of context and unfairly twists their words.

(About our rating scale)

Send us facts to check by filling out this form

Sign up for The Fact Checker weekly newsletter

The Fact Checker is a verified signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network code of principles

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

CHICAGO — President Joe Biden, for several moments, couldn’t speak. At first, it was because he was dabbing his eyes. Then, it was because the cheers were so sustained.

“Thank you,” he said nearly two dozen times, unsuccessfully trying to begin his speech amid a sea of “We love Joe” signs.

His wife, first lady Jill Biden, kept crying. His daughter, Ashley, dabbed her eyes. His son, Hunter, looked on from backstage. The crowd was electrified, eager for a cathartic moment after a weeks-long barrage of can-you-believe-this moments. Biden looked out at his family, who have been a backbone of his career and sounding board for the most difficult decisions of his political life.

“My dad used to have an expression,” he said. “He’d say, ‘Joey, family is the beginning, the middle and the end.’”

Biden has played many roles over his long career. He was introduced as the “young fella” in his 1988 presidential campaign. He was the foreign policy statesman during the eight years he served as vice president. And he was the elder wise man during his 2020 presidential campaign.

On Monday night, as he took the stage for his 13th Democratic National Convention, he was the torch passer. He tried to occupy this new role, one that required a recognition that his time as the party’s chief standard-bearer was nearing an end. He spoke to a crowd that Democrats compared to those of 1960 and 2008, but with the recognition that the catalyst was not him but the new optimism and joy that have overtaken the party since he stepped aside and endorsed his vice president, Kamala Harris.

For much of Biden’s presidency, Harris has been the understudy. As vice president, she is often in the background, never wanting to appear to overshadow the principal.

That relationship has been shifting for weeks now, but never more clearly than when Harris took the stage early Monday evening. She urged the crowd — her crowd, at her convention — to start the week by paying homage to the president.

“I want to kick us off by celebrating our incredible president, Joe Biden, who will be speaking later tonight,” she said. “Joe, thank you for your historic leadership, for your lifetime of service to our nation and for all you will continue to do. We are forever grateful to you. Thank you, Joe.”

“Thank you, Joe Biden, for your leadership,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said shortly after.

“Let’s salute President Joe Biden,” Hillary Clinton said. “He has been democracy’s champion at home and abroad.”

As the evening switched to focus on Biden, his family was a constant presence. Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.) quoted Biden’s mother (“You’re defined by your courage and redeemed by your loyalty”), talked about Biden’s record, and thanked Jill Biden as the crowd held aloft green signs that read, “JILL.”

His daughter Ashley introduced him with tales of how he “is the OG girl dad” and how he remains her best friend.

But the program dragged on so long that Biden’s remarks fell outside of prime-time television coverage on the East Coast. He didn’t take the stage until 11:25 p.m. Eastern time.

Chants of “Thank you Joe! Thank you Joe!” broke out throughout the night, and resumed as he took the stage. At one point, television cameras pointed toward Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the former House speaker who played a critical role in signaling that Biden should drop out of the race, as she chanted the words. The two longtime allies haven’t spoken in weeks, and Pelosi has publicly expressed worry that their relationship may be irreparably damaged.

At one point, Biden reflected on the reports of divisions and sought to bat them down. “It’s been the honor of my lifetime to serve as your president,” he said. “I love the job, but I love my country more. … And all this talk about how I’m angry at all those people who said I should step down — that’s not true.

Biden has often used public speaking to mark major moments in his life. He has used speeches not only to outline policy or ask for votes, but also to express grief or vent his emotions. He prepared for Monday’s speech as he had for most others, gathering several senior advisers — in this case longtime adviser Mike Donilon and speechwriter Vinay Reddy — and bouncing ideas around with historian Jon Meacham. Several hours before the speech, he walked across the convention stage. Asked if it was bittersweet for him, he responded, “It’s a memorable moment.”

A reporter asked if he was ready to pass the torch.

“I am,” he said.

But rarely has he faced a moment like the one he saw Monday night.

The crowd loved him. Some loved him for his career as a top Democrat and as party standard-bearer. Some also loved him for making the decision to step aside.

His family, though, loved him for being a father, a husband, and a grandfather. Biden has often idolized, and sought to emulate, the Kennedys. For much of his career he thought that his eldest, Beau, would succeed him. He thought Beau would be the one who would be president, the one who would carry the political banner for the family.

After Beau’s death in May 2015, the patriarch sought to live up to his late son’s wish that he stay engaged and keep his purpose in life. That initially meant writing books and giving speeches. It eventually meant launching a presidential campaign in 2019, his third attempt to win the nation’s highest office.

Jill Biden, during her remarks, pointed to her husband’s moments of humility, and reflected on the moment a few weeks ago when he ended his reelection bid.

“I saw him dig deep into his soul and decide to no longer seek reelection and endorse Kamala Harris,” she said. “With faith and conviction, Joe knows that our nation’s strength doesn’t come from intimidation or cruelty. It comes from the small acts of kindness that heal deep wounds.”

In the Biden family, Beau Biden’s memory is not far away. And Jill Biden invoked him and the friendship he forged with Harris.

“Our son, Beau, first worked with Kamala when he was attorney general of Delaware,” she said. “He told me at the dinner table one night. Mom, she’s special. Someone to keep your eye on. And he was right.”

Ashley Biden also mentioned Beau, and how they recovered from the devastating loss.

“Dad knows that family is everything. When Hunter and I lost our brother Beau to cancer in 2015, the grief and the pain felt like it might never end,” she said. “Dad had the capacity to step out of his own pain and absorb ours. And I know that Beau is here with us tonight as he is always with us.”

As Biden got to the end of his speech, he ended where he began, his eyes near tears.

“I made a lot of mistakes in my career. But I gave my best to you for 50 years,” he said. “Like many of you, I give my heart and soul to our nation.”

And he grew wistful of the circumstances that have changed over the past few weeks.

I’ve either been too young to be in the Senate because I wasn’t 30 yet or too old to stay as president,” he said. “But I hope you know how grateful I am to all of you.”

As he concluded, his family joined him onstage and he soaked up the moment. Harris joined him in a long embrace.

The convention will continue on Tuesday, with remarks from former president Barack Obama, and on Wednesday, with the vice-presidential acceptance speech from Tim Walz. Thursday will be marked by Kamala Harris’s acceptance speech.

But Biden will be long gone. After his speech on Monday night, he was scheduled to board Air Force One to start two weeks of vacation in California and at his home in Rehoboth Beach, Del. His family will join him.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

More than 20 people were injured after a Ferris wheel at a music festival in Germany caught fire on Saturday evening.

Images show two carriages of the ride on fire as smoke billows into the air at the Highfield Festival near the city of Leipzig.

According to a statement from Saxony police, the ride caught fire shortly after 9 p.m. local time, for reasons that are still unclear.

Four people suffered from burn injuries due to the incident, the statement said, while another was treated for injuries from falling.

According to the statement, 18 people including first responders, police officers and others on the ride came into contact with smoke and were taken to hospitals for medical treatment.

Police have launched an investigation. The scene of the incident has been cordoned off.

German rapper Ski Aggu was performing onstage at the festival when the Ferris wheel caught fire. He later took to his Instagram stories to write that he was “dismayed and shocked” over the night’s events.

He added that he was told in his ear that he should “not cancel the show under any circumstances” but rather maintain dialogue with the crowds to avoid any mass panic.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

Seven members of the same family were killed in an Israeli airstrike in central Gaza on Sunday, medical officials said, as Secretary of State Antony Blinken travels to Israel to push for a ceasefire and hostage deal.

At least seven people were killed, including six children and their mother, in an Israeli airstrike on a home in Deir al-Balah on Sunday, according to the Al-Aqsa hospital. The children’s father was injured, a hospital spokesperson said.

“What did they do to deserve this?” he added. “What resistance did they have?”

As the war rages in Gaza, Blinken is traveling to Israel to, in the words of a senior administration official, “continue to stress the importance of getting this [deal] done.”

The fresh strike in Gaza comes just a day after an Israeli strike killed at least 15 people, all from the same famly, in the al-Zawayda area of Deir al-Balah in central Gaza. Nine children were among those killed, according to Gaza Civil Defense.

In a statement Sunday, the Israeli military said forces continue to operate in Khan Yunis and Dir al-Balah. It said the military struck “targets in the area from which the launches were fired toward Nirim (Friday) and destroyed loaded launchers in the area of Khan Yunis.”

The Israeli military had ordered new evacuation orders in north Khan Younis and east Deir al-Balah on Friday, further reducing the boundaries of the Israeli-designated humanitarian zone.

Palestinians in Gaza have faced a stream of evacuation orders. According to the UN, since October of last year, more than 80% of the Gaza Strip has been subjected to such orders, severely impacting the local population’s access to essential services and shelter.

Israel’s campaign in Gaza – launched following the Hamas attacks of October 7 – has killed more than 40,000 people and reduced much of the territory to rubble. Adding to Gazans’ woes, doctors this week detected the first case of polio in Gaza in 25 years.

Peace efforts accelerate

Secretary of State Antony Blinken is set to arrive in Israel later on Sunday amid urgent efforts to finalize an elusive Gaza ceasefire and hostage deal.

A new ceasefire plan drawn up by the US, Qatar and Egypt was presented on Friday following two days of high stakes talks in Doha. Mediators have been stepping up efforts amid fears of Iranian retaliation for the assassination of a Hamas leader in Tehran.

Blinken’s visit has become an established pattern from the top US diplomat of traveling for in-person meetings to project high-level public pressure around the need for an agreement. He will meet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other senior figures on Monday.

The senior administration official would not say how the US intends to pressure the Israeli government to take the deal.

“Think it is apparent that a deal would not only be in the interest of the Israeli people, but would also help alleviate some of the suffering in Gaza. We’re going to raise all of these issues directly,” they told the press traveling with Blinken.

US officials including President Joe Biden have expressed fresh optimism of finalizing a ceasefire agreement. However, Hamas has dismissed the progress, with a senior official from the militant group telling the BBC that mediators were “selling illusions.”

According to the Israeli Prime Minister’s Office, the Israeli negotiating team is still cautiously optimistic about reaching a ceasefire-hostage deal. A statement from the PMO on Saturday said there was “hope that the heavy pressure” on Hamas from the United States and mediators will “allow a breakthrough in negotiations.”

This post appeared first on cnn.com

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said that Ukraine is “getting stronger” in Kursk, with his troops blowing up a second bridge in the Russian territory on Sunday.

Fighting continues in the Kursk region, where Ukraine has been inching forward since launching its surprise cross-border incursion last week. But Ukraine remains under pressure its occupied east.

The Kursk offensive has left Russia struggling to shore up its own territory. Kyiv seems to have multiple goals with the assault, from boosting morale after a torrid few months to stretching Russia’s resources. A Ukrainian presidential aide said the incursion aimed at ensuring a “fair” negotiation process.

The foothold of Kyiv’s presence in Kursk is “getting stronger” and “now we are reinforcing our positions,” Zelensky said in his latest address.

As part of efforts to cripple Moscow’s logistical capabilities, Ukrainian forces said Sunday they blew up another bridge over the Seym river in the Kursk region, with “precision air strikes.”

“The Air Force aviation continues to deprive the enemy of logistics capabilities with precision air strikes, which significantly affects the course of combat operations,” Ukrainian Air Force Commander Mykolaiv Oleshchuk said in a post on social media that included a video showing plumes of smoke engulfing parts of the bridge.

It comes two days after Ukrainian forces destroyed another bridge over the Seym. Russia’s foreign ministry said Ukraine had used Western rockets to carry out that attack, which were likely US-made HIMARS.

Kyiv’s forces took control of Sudzha after launching their cross-border incursion earlier this month and have established a Ukrainian military commandant’s office there.

The Ukrainian military says it has taken control of more than 1,000 square kilometers of Russian territory amid the ongoing incursion in the southwestern region.

On Sunday, Ukrainian armed forces published a video of what they said were “Sivalka” flamethrower systems “engaged in active combat operations” in the Kursk direction.

Russia has urged residents to evacuate areas where heavy fighting is underway. The head of the Kursk region’s Korenevsky district, Marina Degtyareva, appealed to residents who have left the area not to return.

“The operational situation on the territory of our district remains complicated. Some citizens are not giving up their attempts to return home, thus hindering the work of our military,” she said on Sunday. “Returning to the area so far is impossible for local residents, and sometimes results in terrible tragedies.”

“I appeal to all residents of Korenevsky district, let’s be patient and let our military deal with the enemy, let’s not interfere with our defenders,” Degtyareva said, adding that authorities would let residents know when it is safe to return.

Russian forces on the outskirts of Pokrovsk in Donetsk region

Meanwhile, Russian forces are continuing their advances in eastern Ukraine, where Kyiv has been under pressure all year.

Russia’s army has moved closer to the city of Pokrovsk in Donetsk region, which serves as a key hub for the Ukrainian military because of its easy access to the town of Kostiantynivka, another military center. Ukraine uses the road connecting the two to resupply the front lines and evacuate casualties.

“The Russians are close, up to 11 kilometers from the outskirts of the town. The town is getting ready,” Serhii Dobriak, the head of the Pokrovsk city military administration, said Sunday.

“Every town in Donetsk region has a combat unit assigned to it, and defense plans have been developed. We are working with the military to build fortifications. This is a continuous process,” Dobriak said.

The evacuation of civilians from Pokrovsk has been accelerated because of the approach of Russian troops, he said. Nearly 1,800 people have been evacuated from the city over the past week alone, while until recently 450-500 residents were being evacuated every month.

“The Russians are destroying our towns and villages, killing civilians, so we need to think about our safety and evacuate,” Dobriak said. “Currently, the town is being hit by missiles, MLRS, and there have been several guided aerial bomb attacks.”

All services are currently operating in the community, including shops, farmers’ markets, pharmacies, banks and ATMs. Courts and administrative service centers are also open, Dobriak said.

Ukraine’s Vice Prime Minister Iryna Vereshchuk on Sunday urged residents of Pokrovsk and other settlements “in the immediate vicinity of the front line” to evacuate and “leave for safer regions.”

Vereshchuk said she understood residents would have to leave their jobs, homes and property, but “nevertheless, the lives and health of you and your children are more valuable,” and staying in the area interferes with the work of the defense forces.

“I also understand that you may face difficulties and uncertainty during the evacuation. However, it is far better than being under enemy fire, on the front line. You will not be alone in the evacuation,” she said, adding “the government, local authorities, volunteers, international organizations and, in fact, the host communities will all help.”

Intense fighting is also underway around the villages of Pivnichne and Zalizne in Donetsk region, located about 40 miles east of Pokrovsk, where Russian forces launched “a massive assault” Sunday morning, Ukraine’s General Staff said.

“The Russian invaders, supported by an armored group of 12 vehicles, attempted to break through the Ukrainian military positions and advance towards Toretsk,” the General Staff said, referring to another strategic town that could open the way for Russian forces to advance towards Kostiantynivka, Kramatorsk and Sloviansk.

Over the course of the week, Russia has used more than 40 missiles of various types, 750 guided aerial bombs and 200 strike UAVs of different types against Ukrainian cities and villages, President Volodymyr Zelensky said Sunday.

“For such terror, the occupier must be held accountable before the courts and history. They are already facing the strength of our warriors,” Zelensky said.

In his daily address on Sunday, Zelensky said Ukrainian units were “doing everything to hold the positions” amid dozens of attacks on the front lines in Donetsk.

“And all this is more than just defense for Ukraine; it is now our primary task in defensive operations overall: to destroy as much Russian war potential as possible and conduct maximum counteroffensive actions,” Zelensky said.

“Everything that inflicts losses on the Russian army, Russian state, their military-industrial complex, and their economy helps prevent the war from expanding and brings us closer to a just end to this aggression – a just peace for Ukraine,” he added.

Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief General Syrskyi told Zelensky that “our guys are doing great on all fronts” but he called for allies to deliver supplies more quickly. “There are no vacations in war,” Syrskyi said, directing his comments especially to the United States, United Kingdom, and France.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

Israeli police are investigating an explosion that killed a person in Tel Aviv on Sunday evening.

The person who died is believed to have been carrying the explosive material, District Commander Peretz Amar said. Police have not yet identified the person.

A second person was moderately injured after being hit in the lower body by shrapnel and was taken to a hospital.

Amar said that it was “too early to say” whether it was a terrorist attack.

Police said they received dozens of calls reporting the loud explosion on HaLehi Street in Tel Aviv.

This is a developing story. More to come.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

“What are your parents’ names?”

Fang, then a third grader, hemmed and hawed at the simple question as her teacher waited impatiently, unaware the 9-year-old was caught in a dilemma.

Since preschool, Fang had been officially registered as the daughter of her eldest uncle – an attempt by her birth parents to circumvent harsh penalties for having a second baby under China’s controversial one-child policy that was enforced from 1980 to 2015.

Since then, Beijing has gradually lifted the birth caps from one to two children, then to three in 2021, in a bid to arrest a looming demographic crisis.

The one-child rules have gone, but the wounds of the past cast long shadows. A new generation of women like Fang, haunted by their parents’ struggles and their own sacrifices as children under the one-child policy, now eye parenthood with reluctance – making Beijing’s current pro-birth push a tough sell.

Fang was born in the 1990s – when the one-child limit was at its strictest – and became a big sister just a year later, when her mother “illegally” became pregnant again. To avoid punishment, the family sent Fang to live with extended family members, while her mother pretended her second pregnancy was her first.

Fang, now 30 and married, doesn’t want children at all.

“All the fears, drifts and insecurity felt throughout my own childhood have, more or less, played a part in my current call,” she said.

Sacrifices of eldest daughters

Keeping their firstborn secret spared Fang’s parents ruinous fines, job loss and even forced abortion and sterilization – the heavy price for having an “unauthorized” second child, another daughter.

Fang was finally allowed to return home at age 10 – but was still registered as her eldest uncle’s daughter and told to “stick with her official registration” whenever she was asked about her parents.

After the one-child policy was dismantled in 2015, Fang’s parents tried for another child. Fang sensed their unstated wish for a son, but her mother gave birth to a girl – her third.

Over 30 years of China’s one-child policy, an estimated 20 million baby girls “disappeared” due to sex-selective abortions or infanticide, according to Li Shuzhuo, director of the Center for Population and Social Policy Research at China’s Xi’an Jiaotong University.

She was born in a rural village in northeastern Shandong, one of the 19 provinces that allowed rural couples to have a second child – if their first was a girl – during the single child policy’s reign.

This “one-and-a-half child policy” variant, introduced in 1984, reinforced the traditional Chinese preference for sons by implying that girls were worth “half” as much as boys, as noted in a leading Chinese academic study published last year.

Yao’s first sibling was a girl – allowed under the policy – but then her mother fell pregnant with a third child – a forbidden one – and soon fled to another village with Yao’s sister, leaving Yao in the care of her grandparents.

Yao said her mother was forced to keep her pregnancy secret to avoid a potential forced abortion. But after the “extra baby” arrived, she sought to officially register him as her son – and paid a crushing fine of 50,000 yuan (about $7,000).

For Yao, it meant losing her mother’s companionship for nearly a year when she moved out to carry her son to term.

“I was only a first grader then and had no one to walk me to and from school,” Yao recalled.

“I felt all alone at that time.”

From one to three – or none?

Since the shift to a three-child policy in 2021, Beijing has been running national campaigns to foster a “pro-birth culture” as China’s population shrinks and grays at an alarming rate.

Posters and slogans once warning of the perils of having more than one child have been replaced with ones encouraging more births. Local governments have rolled out a flurry of policy incentives, from cash handouts and real estate subsidies to the extension of maternity leave.

The policy U-turn, from birth limits to birth boost, has left Yao “speechless.”

“How ‘well-planned’ the family-planning policy is!” Yao mocked. “(The government) used to slap us for having two (babies) and now expects us to have three?”

Fang said she was “somewhat nettled” by Beijing’s initiatives to spur births, arguing: “Having kids or not is purely a woman’s personal choice, not out of any policy, be it a stick or a carrot.”

In May, China’s National Health Commission issued a dozen “birth-friendly theme posters” to local bureaus, calling for a “widespread dissemination” from social media to community parks.

The move was met with wry comments online, referencing past one-child slogans like “Fewer kids, happier lives,” and, “If you want to be rich, have fewer children and plant more trees.”

These chants are not just recounted for ridicule – people have found new resonance with the ruling Chinese Communist Party’s old teachings and are now acting on them earnestly.

Last year, the country’s total fertility rate (TFR) – meaning the average number of children a woman delivers during her reproductive years – stood at around 1.0, according to the 2024 China Birth Report from the YuWa Population Research Institute, a China-based think tank.

That’s far lower than the 2.1 rate needed to maintain a stable population, or the “replacement rate” in demographic terms, and ranks as the second lowest among the world’s major economies.

The birth deficit is even grimmer in China’s richest city, Shanghai, where roughly half of all women do not have children throughout their reproductive periods, based on the city’s 2023 TFR figure (0.6) announced in May.

Rock kicked off cliff

Yi Fuxian, an expert on China’s demographics at the University of Wisconsin, says the country faces three major obstacles to reversing its shrinking population: low fertility desire, high child-raising costs and a climbing infertility rate.

Of these, “the sole challenge Beijing has any capacity to impact is the affordability issue,” Yi said.

Last month, the Communist Party proposed boosting incentives, including childbirth subsidies and more affordable childcare, at a key meeting of party leaders.

Yet, debt-stricken local governments – including many that are struggling to recover from three years of strict pandemic controls and a loss of revenue from a real estate crash – can only carry them out on a shoestring budget, dooming the party’s birth boost attempt, according to Yi.

Chinese state-run media outlet Jiemian reported in early June that the highest childcare subsidies nationwide amount to only 57,800 yuan (about $8,000) – a drop in the bucket for one of the world’s priciest countries to raise kids.

The cost of raising a child to age 18 in China is 6.3 times its gross domestic product (GDP) per capita – second only to its neighbor South Korea at 7.79 times, according to a YuWa report.

The hefty price tag means some people are putting off parenthood until later in life, when their fertility and openness to child-rearing might be on the wane.

“China has fallen into a ‘low-fertility trap’ and the figure will only dip further,” warned Yi.

A “low fertility trap” describes a self-reinforcing cycle, where low fertility rates (typically under 1.5) drive population aging and economic stagnation – which further deter childbearing and sink the figure even lower.

“China’s fertility rate should have been falling naturally as its economy advances, like a giant rock gradually rolling down along a hillside,” Yi said. “But the one-child policy kicked the rock right down the cliff – it’s extremely hard to lift the rock back now.”

‘State violence’

Online discussions in China about childbirth decisions are often dominated by economic concerns, but some have also thrown shade at the country’s one-child policy by sharing decades-old receipts for over-quota birth fines on Xiaohongshu, China’s version of Instagram.

“Childbearing isn’t just a financial matter,” said Lü Pin, a prominent Chinese feminist.

“Coercive family planning, as a form of state violence, has scarred women deeply … and people just haven’t got over it yet,” added Lü, who’s pursuing a doctorate in women and politics at Rutgers University in the United States.

Forced abortion and sterilization, arguably the most ghoulish facet of China’s one-child “social engineering,” have left an indelible mark on hundreds of millions of Chinese women, physically and mentally.

According to state-owned news outlet The Paper, between 1980 and 2014, 324 million Chinese women were fitted with intrauterine devices (IUDs) and 107 million underwent tubal ligations to prevent pregnancy.

Decades after the one-child policy’s introduction in 1980, those contraceptive devices – only meant to remain in women’s bodies for five to 20 years – have long outlived their safe stay.

But family planning officials, who once had performance targets to push women to fit IUDs after having their first child, now lack similar incentives to remove those devices in a timely manner, demographer Sun Xiaoming told The Beijing News, a state-linked newspaper.

“The government has stretched its hands far enough – even into common folks’ bodies!” Yi said.

Lü added that Beijing had not conducted any “open self-reflection, nor even admission (of the state-inflicted trauma).”

“Now it expects women to forget all this and embrace its lurch to birth boost? Fat chance.”

This post appeared first on cnn.com

A former Soviet aircraft carrier burned in a waterway near Shanghai over the weekend, the latest setback for the decommissioned warship since its conversion into a Chinese tourist attraction.

The carrier Minsk, which has been anchored for the past eight years in a lagoon near the Yangtze River in Nantong, Jiangsu province, caught fire during renovations for it to become part of a military theme park, state-run China National Radio reported Saturday.

The blaze broke out Friday afternoon and was extinguished about 24 hours later, the report said.

Images on social media showed thick smoke and large flames burning on the deck of the carrier, with later pictures showing extensive damage to the ship’s superstructure and charred metal on its flank below the main deck.

“There are no casualties, and the cause of the accident is under investigation,” the report said, citing local fire officials.

The Minsk had previously been the main attraction for 16 years at a now defunct theme park in southern China, according to the report.

Recently started renovation efforts to make the ship the centerpiece of another theme park are now in doubt, the report added.

“It’s a pity that a fire has made the prospects of this project full of too many uncertainties,” an official told China National Radio.

Once part of the mighty Soviet Pacific Fleet, the Minsk was the second of four Kiev-class aircraft carriers built by the Soviet Union between 1970 and 1987.

Conventionally powered and with a displacement of about 42,000 tons – less than half that of a US Navy Nimitz-class nuclear-powered aircraft carrier – the 896-feet (273 meter) ship could carry a dozen fighter jets and an equal number of helicopters.

Built at a shipyard in what is now Ukraine and named after what is now the capital of Belarus, it served in the Soviet Pacific Fleet after its commissioning in 1978 until the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, when it became property of the Russian Navy.

Russia retired the ship in 1993, selling it and a sister ship, the Novorossiysk, to a South Korean company for scrap.

While the Novorossiysk was dismantled in the South Korean port of Pohang, environmental groups opposed the presence of the Minsk in the country. The ship was then sold to a Chinese company, eventually being transferred to developers who made it the centerpiece of the Minsk World theme park in Shenzhen, which opened in 2000.

The park suffered financial troubles and eventually closed in 2016, with the Minsk moved to its current site in Nantong.

One of the Minsk’s other sister ships, the Kiev – named for the Ukrainian capital – is an attraction at the Binhai Aircraft Carrier Theme Park in Tianjin, on China’s northeastern coast.

Of the four Kiev-class carriers the Soviets built, only the final one, the Baku, remains in service. It was sold to India in 2004, refurbished and commissioned into the Indian Navy in 2013 as the INS Vikramaditya and is now the service’s flagship.

This post appeared first on cnn.com