Author

admin

Browsing

Concerns are mounting for the safety of United Nations peacekeeping forces in southern Lebanon amid Israel’s ground incursion, UN peacekeeping chief Jean-Pierre Lacroix warned on Thursday, after Israeli fire resulted in the injury of two UN troops.

Briefing the UN Security Council on Thursday, UN Under-Secretary General for Peace Operations Lacroix described hostilities between Israeli forces and Iran-backed militant group Hezbollah in southern Lebanon as “increasingly alarming,” and putting “peacekeepers at serious risk.”

“The safety and security of peacekeepers is now increasingly in jeopardy,” Lacroix said.

The UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) reported early Thursday that the peacekeepers were injured after an Israeli tank fired toward an observation tower at its headquarters in the southern Lebanese city Naqoura.

The Israeli tank fire directly hit the tower, causing the peacekeepers to fall, UNIFIL said, adding that other “nearby positions have been repeatedly hit.”

UNFIL said that “any deliberate attack on peacekeepers is a grave violation of international humanitarian law.”

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have accused Hezbollah of operating in areas near UNIFIL posts, and said in a statement that it had asked UNIFIL forces to “remain in protected spaces” during the incident.

“The IDF is operating in southern Lebanon and maintains routine communication with UNIFIL,” the IDF said in a statement after Thursday’s incident.

“This morning (Thursday), IDF troops operated in the area of Naqoura, next to a UNIFIL base. Accordingly, the IDF instructed the UN forces in the area to remain in protected spaces, following which the forces opened fire in the area,” the statement added.

UN deputy spokesperson Farhan Haq said the two peacekeepers – both Indonesian – were hospitalized. Their injuries are not serious, he said.

UN peacekeepers have been stationed in southern Lebanon since 2006, per a mandate by the United Nations Security Council. UN peacekeepers were drawn from armies of several nations to monitor the situation along the roughly 120-kilometer (74-mile) Blue Line which separates the two states.

The incident came as Israel expands its strikes across Lebanon. On Thursday, Israeli strikes on a densely populated Beirut neighborhood killed at least 22 people and wounded 117, the Lebanese health ministry said.

International outcry

The injury of the UN peacekeepers drew condemnation from several countries including Italy, France, and Ireland, who all have contingents in the UN peacekeeping mission in Lebanon.

Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni summoned the Israeli ambassador in Rome on Thursday after what she described as “unacceptable” behavior by the Israeli forces.

Meloni’s office said two Italian bases of UNIFIL were “hit by gunfire from the Israeli army” on Thursday and added that the prime minister spoke to the Commander of the Western Sector of the UNIFIL mission, Gen. Stefano Messina, for an update on the safety of the Italian troops.

The Italian leader also contacted Israel’s Defense Minister Yoav Gallant to “firmly remind” him that “what is happening near the Italian UNIFIL bases in southern Lebanon” is “unacceptable,” according to an Italian government statement.

Indonesia’s mission to the UN blasted Israel over what it called “deliberate attacks,” saying Friday that Israel’s actions “represent a blatant attempt to spread terror on the ground to intimidate both the peacekeeping mission and international community.”

France also expressed “deep concern” after the attack, saying it was “awaiting explanations from the Israeli authorities.”

“The protection of peacekeepers is an obligation imposed on all parties to a conflict. France calls on the parties to respect this obligation, and to allow UNIFIL to continue to implement its mandate, including by respecting its freedom of movement,” a spokesperson for the French foreign ministry said.

Irish Foreign Minister Micheál Martin described the IDF’s “targeting & firing on UNIFIL positions” as “reprehensible” and “unacceptable.”

Earlier this week, Irish Prime Minister Simon Harris also expressed concern after Israeli tanks were stationed close to an UN outpost manned by Irish peacekeepers.

The European Union High Representative for Foreign Affairs Josep Borrell condemned what he called an “inadmissible act,” posting to X: “Another line has been dangerously crossed in Lebanon: IDF shelling of UN peacekeepers whose positions are known. We condemn this inadmissible act, for which there is no justification.”

The EU foreign policy chief reiterated his support for UNIFIL and called for full accountability regarding the incident.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

Nobuyo Oyama, the voice of beloved Japanese anime “Doraemon” for a generation of children across Asia, has died at age 90, her agency confirmed on Friday.

Oyama died on September 29 due to old age, according to the Actors 7 agency. It apologized for the delay in its statement, adding: “We would like to express our sincere gratitude for the kindness you extended to the deceased during her lifetime.”

A private funeral attended by relatives was held for Oyama, the agency said.

Oyama was best known for voicing the eponymous character in the “Doraemon” television show, which aired from 1979 through 2005 – just one of three shows in the larger Doraemon franchise, which became globally popular, especially in regional markets like Hong Kong and Vietnam.

The franchise includes dozens of animated films, video games, music albums and manga series.

They follow the adventures of Doraemon, a robotic cat from the 22nd century who arrives in the present day to help a young boy called Nobita “who’s terrible at everything,” according to the franchise’s official website. The friendly-looking blue-and-white character often rescues Nobita by pulling secret gadgets from the future out of the pocket in his stomach.

Oyama was born in Tokyo, according to Japan’s public broadcaster NHK. Before voicing Doraemon, she also played a role in NHK’s puppet show “Boo Foo Woo,” which ran from 1960 to 1967, the broadcaster said.

But it was the animated show that launched her to worldwide fame – so much so that the 1979 show is also known as the “Oyama edition” to distinguish it from other Doraemon adaptations.

The news of Oyama’s death spurred a wave of tributes on social media, with fans from across the world expressing condolences and remembering her as an iconic voice of their childhoods.

“Ms. Nobuyo Ōyama… She was someone who supported me from the very beginning of my career. Thank you so much for all your hard work over the years. I truly appreciate it,” tweeted Kazuhiko Inoue, who voiced fan favorite character Kakashi in the global manga hit “Naruto,” and had parts in other popular series including “JoJo’s Bizarre Adventure” and “Demon Slayer.”

“When I think of Doraemon, Nobuyo Oyama’s voice plays in my mind,” one user wrote on social platform X. Another wrote: “Doraemon, I’ve loved you ever since I can remember, thanks to Nobuyo Oyama.”

Others expressed grief that Oyama had died so shortly after the death in July of Noriko Ohara, the voice of Nobita.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

Boeing withdrew a contract offer for 33,000 machinists who have been on strike since mid-September, and said further negotiations “do not make sense at this point.”

The machinists walked off the job on Sept. 13 after overwhelmingly rejecting a tentative labor deal, halting production of most of Boeing’s aircraft, which are made in the Puget Sound area. Boeing later sweetened the offer, increasing pay raises, a ratification bonus and other improvements, which the union turned down, arguing that it was not negotiated.

Talks again broke down this week, meaning the strike will continue. The stoppage will cost Boeing more than $1 billion per month, S&P Global Ratings said Tuesday as it issued a negative outlook for the aerospace giant’s credit ratings.

Stephanie Pope, CEO of Boeing’s commercial aircraft unit, said the company improved contract pay during talks this week but said the union didn’t consider the proposals.

“Instead, the union made non-negotiable demands far in excess of what can be accepted if we are to remain competitive as a business,” Pope said in a staff note.

The union, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, said Tuesday that Boeing refused to improve wages, retirement plans and vacation or sick leave.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

DETROIT — General Motors will drop the name “Ultium” for its electric vehicle batteries and supporting technologies after spending years promoting the brand as it rethinks its EV and battery operations.

The Detroit automaker confirmed the switch Tuesday ahead of an investor event. Executives used the day to discuss lowering battery costs and tout efforts to diversify battery chemistries.

GM also confirmed it is on pace to produce and wholesale about 200,000 EVs for North America this year, achieving profitability on a production, or contribution-margin basis, by the end of this year.

Aside from EVs, GM touted its lowering capital costs and the company’s flexibility to produce both traditional vehicles with internal combustion engines and EVs. Its commitment to EVs comes amid slower-than-expected adoption of electric vehicles.

Shares of GM were roughly level aside from a roughly 3% increase during the beginning of the event.

The change to Ultium comes after GM spent billions of dollars to develop in-house “Ultium” batteries and technologies that the automaker previously touted as “revolutionary” and the ultimate technologies to be able to build a profitable EV business.

The company said the batteries and the technologies will remain, but the name “Ultium” will not, other than production operations such as its “Ultium Cells” joint venture plants with LG Energy Solution.

“As GM continues to expand its EV business, the company is no longer branding its electric vehicle architecture, battery and cells, or EV components with the Ultium name, starting in North America,” the company said in a statement.

GM has been rethinking its EV battery strategy amid changing market conditions and an influx of new, outside executives, including Tesla veterans JP Clausen, who now leads GM manufacturing, and Kurt Kelty, GM’s vice president of battery.

The automaker’s EV sales are growing, but not at the pace the company wanted. It reported a roughly 60% year-over-year increase in EVs during the third quarter, to roughly 32,100 units sold. Still, EVs made up only 4.9% of the company’s total third-quarter sales.

The 200,00 EV target reconfirmed by GM CEO Mary Barra on Tuesday is down from a previous guidance of 200,00 to 250,000 EVs, which had been trimmed from as high as 300,000 units.

GM has already started moving away from its original Ultium pouch cells, produced with LG with nickel manganese cobalt, to other battery types and chemistries.

GM earlier this year announced a more than $3 billion deal to manufacture hard-can batteries, known as prismatic cells, with South Korea’s Samsung SDI, a rival of LG.

“We’re moving from a single-source, single-form factor, single-chemistry to a multi-chemistry, multi-form factor, multi-supplier strategy,” Kelty told The Information in a report published Monday. “What we’re going to do going forward is really optimize for each vehicle.”

The automaker is turning to that optimization strategy after spending millions of dollars in marketing and advertising, including back-to-back years of star-studded Super Bowl ads in 2021 and 2022 for Ultium in vehicles that weren’t available yet for customers to purchase.

GM is rethinking other areas as well. Rory Harvey, GM president of global markets, including North America, in September confirmed to CNBC that the company was completely rethinking its plans for a second all-electric vehicle plant in Orion Township, Michigan — from production down through the entire supply chain.

“We always get lessons. We always get learning,” he said in September. “The reason that we’re doing what we’re doing with Orion is the fact that, you know, if you looked at the original gradient of EV adoption, there’s no doubt that, both in the industry and from ours, it was slightly more aggressive than it is.”

“This gives us the ability to do a stop breath and refocus and say what is appropriate for the customer demands that are out there today?” he said.

GM currently has one plant in the U.S. that exclusively produces EVs, called Factory Zero in Detroit. The Orion plant was expected to be the second by the end of 2024 before the company delayed those plans by at least a year.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

As Hurricane Milton approached landfall in western Florida on Wednesday, the Biden administration warned consumers and businesses of the heightened risk of potential fraud, price gouging and collusion that accompanies major natural disasters.

“Wrongdoers are looking to exploit opportunities and victims of natural disasters for their own personal gain,” U.S. Attorney Ronald C. Gathe Jr. for the Middle District of Louisiana said in a statement.

Federal Trade Commission chair Lina Khan said the FTC is “hearing troubling reports of price gouging for essentials that are necessary for people to get out of harm’s way — from hotels to groceries to gas.”

By noon ET on Wednesday, nearly a quarter of gas stations in Florida were out of gas, according to Patrick De Haan, an oil and gas analyst who tracks pump supply.

“Companies are on notice: do not use the hurricane as an excuse to exploit people through illegal behavior,” said Manish Kumar, a deputy assistant attorney general in the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division.

Most states have laws intended to curb price gouging, with many of these restrictions tied to declared states of emergency.

Several major airlines and retailers have told CNBC in recent days that they froze prices in advance of the storm.

“Once we have any emergency situation, all of our prices are freeze,” Kelly Mayhall, president of Home Depot’s Southern division told CNBC Wednesday.

Amid a historic hurricane season, the Biden administration cited a number of issues for consumers to be on the lookout for, including fraudulent charities that claim to be soliciting donations for disaster victims, scammers trying to get personal information or money, and exorbitant pricing for necessities.

“Any company or individual that tries to exploit Americans in an emergency should know that the Administration is monitoring for allegations of fraud and price gouging and will hold those taking advantage of the situation accountable,” Vice President Kamala Harris said in a statement on Wednesday.

Hurricane Milton was moving through the Gulf of Mexico as a Category 4 storm early Wednesday afternoon, and was expected to hit the western Florida Gulf Coast sometime between 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. ET, according to NBC News meteorologists.

The National Hurricane Center warned that evacuations and other precautions should have been completed by early on Wednesday.

In September, Hurricane Helen caused widespread devastation across the South, killing more than 230 people. North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein has also warned of price gouging in his state.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

TD Bank pleaded guilty Thursday to multiple criminal charges and agreed to pay a whopping $3 billion in fines and other penalties to the Department of Justice and financial regulators for failing to monitor money laundering by drug traffickers and other criminals.

As part of the deal, TD Bank, whose U.S. unit is the 10th-largest American bank by assets, also will have limits to its growth imposed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The total assets of TD Bank’s two U.S. banking subsidiaries will be barred from exceeding $434 billion under that restriction.

The restrictions are similar to those imposed by the Federal Reserve on Wells Fargo in 2018 over what the Federal Reserve called “widespread consumer abuses” at that bank.

“By making its services convenient for criminals, TD Bank became one,” said Attorney General Merrick Garland on Thursday.

“Today, TD Bank also became the largest bank in U.S. history to plead guilty to Bank Secrecy Act program failures, and the first US bank in history to plead guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering,” Garland said.

“TD Bank chose profits over compliance with the law — a decision that is now costing the bank billions of dollars in penalties. Let me be clear: our investigation continues, and no individual involved in TD Bank’s illegal conduct is off limits.”Garland, speaking at a press conference in Washington, D.C., said a monitor would oversee the bank’s compliance with anti-money-laundering practices for three years as part of a settlement with the DOJ, which is receiving $1.8 billion in connection with the bank’s guilty plea in federal court in Newark, New Jersey.

The attorney general said that over a six-year period that ended last October, TD Bank admittedly failed to monitor a stunning $18.3 trillion in customer activity, which allowed three money laundering networks to transfer more than $670 million through accounts at the bank.

At least one of those schemes involved five bank employees, Garland said.

“At various times, high-level executives, including the person who became the bank’s chief anti-money laundering officer, knew there were serious problems with the bank’s anti-money laundering program, but the bank failed to correct them,” the attorney general said.

Garland read reporters details of electronic messages which showed the awareness and concerns bank employees had about suspicious transactions about one individual, known as David, who personally moved more than $470 million in illicit funds through TD Bank branches in the United States.

“In August 2021, a TD Bank store manager emailed another store manager and remarked, quote, ‘You guys really need to shut this down. Lol,’ ” Garland noted.

“In February 2021, one TD Bank store employee saw that David’s network had purchased more than $1 million in official bank checks with cash in a single day,” Garland said. “The employee asked, quote, how is that not money laundering a bank off a back office?′ ”

Another TD Bank “employee responded, quote, ‘Oh, it 100% is,’ ” Garland said.

Garland said the DOJ expected to file other prosecutions in the case.

When asked if that meant charging TD Bank executives, the attorney general said, “My general response to these kind of questions is, we don’t comment on ongoing investigations, but I was indicating that we would expect future cases against individuals.”

As part of Thursday’s settlement, TD Bank, which is the second largest bank in Canada, will pay $1.3 billion to the Treasury Department’s Finacial Crimes Enforcement Network, the largest such penalty ever imposed by FinCEN or Treasury on a depository institution.

FinCEN also has imposed a four-year independent monitorship on TD Bank to oversee required remediation of its practices.

“The vast majority of financial institutions have partnered with FinCEN to protect the integrity of the U.S. financial system,” said Deputy Treasury Secretary Wally Adeyemo. “TD Bank did the opposite.”

“From fentanyl and narcotics trafficking, to terrorist financing and human trafficking, TD Bank’s chronic failures provided fertile ground for a host of illicit activity to penetrate our financial system,” Adeymo said.

The Wall Street Journal reported in May that the DOJ was investigating how Chinese organized crime groups and drug traffickers used TD Bank to launder money derived from the sale of the deadly opiate fentanyl in the United States.

The Federal Reserve Board on Thursday fined TD Bank more than $124 million for violations related to anti-money laundering laws, saying the bank failed to “conduct adequate risk management and oversight of its retail banking operations in the United States, resulting in a U.S. subsidiary being used to launder hundreds of millions of dollars in illicit proceeds.”

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., in a statement to CNBC blasted Thursday’s deal.

“Big banks treat government fines as the cost of doing business,” Warren said.

“This settlement lets bad bank executives off the hook for allowing TD Bank to be used as a criminal slush fund. The Department of Justice and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency need to do better in enforcing our anti-money laundering laws,” Warren said.

In a statement, TD Bank Group CEO Bharat Masrani said, “We have taken full responsibility for the failures of our U.S. AML program and are making the investments, changes and enhancements required to deliver on our commitments.”

“This is a difficult chapter in our Bank’s history. These failures took place on my watch as CEO and I apologize to all our stakeholders,” Masrani said.

TD Bank shares were down more than 5% on Thursday afternoon.

In September, TD Bank was ordered to pay nearly $28 million by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau for repeatedly furnishing consumer reporting agencies with information about customers that contained numerous errors, and waiting more than a year to fix those mistakes despite knowing about them.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

AMD launched a new artificial-intelligence chip on Thursday that is taking direct aim at Nvidia’s data center graphics processors, known as GPUs.

The Instinct MI325X, as the chip is called, will start production before the end of 2024, AMD said Thursday during an event announcing the new product. If AMD’s AI chips are seen by developers and cloud giants as a close substitute for Nvidia’s products, it could put pricing pressure on Nvidia, which has enjoyed roughly 75% gross margins while its GPUs have been in high demand over the past year.

Advanced generative AI such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT requires massive data centers full of GPUs in order to do the necessary processing, which has created demand for more companies to provide AI chips.

In the past few years, Nvidia has dominated the majority of the data center GPU market, but AMD is historically in second place. Now, AMD is aiming to take share from its Silicon Valley rival or at least to capture a big chunk of the market, which it says will be worth $500 billion by 2028.

“AI demand has actually continued to take off and actually exceed expectations. It’s clear that the rate of investment is continuing to grow everywhere,” AMD CEO Lisa Su said at the event.

AMD didn’t reveal new major cloud or internet customers for its Instinct GPUs at the event, but the company has previously disclosed that both Meta and Microsoft buy its AI GPUs and that OpenAI uses them for some applications. The company also did not disclose pricing for the Instinct MI325X, which is typically sold as part of a complete server.

With the launch of the MI325X, AMD is accelerating its product schedule to release new chips on an annual schedule to better compete with Nvidia and take advantage of the boom for AI chips. The new AI chip is the successor to the MI300X, which started shipping late last year. AMD’s 2025 chip will be called MI350, and its 2026 chip will be called MI400, the company said.

The MI325X’s rollout will pit it against Nvidia’s upcoming Blackwell chips, which Nvidia has said will start shipping in significant quantities early next year.

A successful launch for AMD’s newest data center GPU could draw interest from investors that are looking for additional companies that are in line to benefit from the AI boom. AMD is only up 20% so far in 2024 while Nvidia’s stock is up over 175%. Most industry estimates say Nvidia has over 90% of the market for data center AI chips.

AMD stock fell 3% during trading on Thursday.

AMD’s biggest obstacle in taking market share is that its rival’s chips use their own programming language, CUDA, which has become standard among AI developers. That essentially locks developers into Nvidia’s ecosystem.

In response, AMD this week said that it has been improving its competing software, called ROCm, so that AI developers can more easily switch more of their AI models over to AMD’s chips, which it calls accelerators.

AMD has framed its AI accelerators as more competitive for use cases where AI models are creating content or making predictions rather than when an AI model is processing terabytes of data to improve. That’s partially due to the advanced memory AMD is using on its chip, it said, which allows it to server Meta’s Llama AI model faster than some Nvidia chips.

“What you see is that MI325 platform delivers up to 40% more inference performance than the H200 on Llama 3.1,” said Su, referring to Meta’s large-language AI model.

While AI accelerators and GPUs have become the most intensely watched part of the semiconductor industry, AMD’s core business has been central processors, or CPUs, that lay at the heart of nearly every server in the world.

AMD’s data center sales during the June quarter more than doubled in the past year to $2.8 billion, with AI chips accounting for only about $1 billion, the company said in July.

AMD takes about 34% of total dollars spent on data center CPUs, the company said. That’s still less than Intel, which remains the boss of the market with its Xeon line of chips. AMD is aiming to change that with a new line of CPUs, called EPYC 5th Gen, that it also announced on Thursday.

Those chips come in a number of different configurations ranging from a low-cost and low-power 8-core chip that costs $527 to 192-core, 500-watt processors intended for supercomputers that cost $14,813 per chip.

The new CPUs are particularly good for feeding data into AI workloads, AMD said. Nearly all GPUs require a CPU on the same system in order to boot up the computer.

“Today’s AI is really about CPU capability, and you see that in data analytics and a lot of those types of applications,” Su said.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

There are those who dislike the metaphor of the frog in the slowly boiling water, but it’s hard to deny its utility. Perhaps frogs aren’t as complacent as the morality tale would suggest, but the idea of a critter becoming acclimated to increasingly dangerous environs deserves some sort of short hand. Particularly at the moment.

It is safe to say that, with less than a month remaining before the presidential election, many supporters of both of the major-party candidates would compare the American populace to those frogs. Republicans see a citizenry unaware that the nation is facing a crisis of the economy and public safety, mirroring the (pun intended) overheated presentation of their nominee, former president Donald Trump. Democrats see a country unconcerned about the risk of tipping into authoritarianism, a concern amplified by Vice President Kamala Harris (and that’s also driven by Trump’s past actions and rhetoric).

Partisans tend to see the other party’s candidate as an embodiment of the problem, an extreme manifestation of a political ideology they oppose. Unsurprisingly, then, polling conducted by YouGov for the Economist found that significant portions of the country view Trump and Harris not just as conservative and liberal, respectively, but very liberal or conservative. Perhaps unexpectedly, more Americans say Harris is very liberal (37 percent) than say Trump is very conservative (28 percent).

That’s in part because Democrats are less likely to say that Trump is very conservative (40 percent do) than Republicans are to say that Harris is very liberal (71 percent do).

That is in part because Republicans are more fervent in their ideology than are Democrats. That’s reflected in how partisans view their own candidates. About half of Republicans say Trump is “conservative” with another quarter saying he’s “very conservative.” Among Democrats, a bit under half say Harris is “liberal” — with nearly a third describing her as “moderate.”

The embrace of “liberal” as a descriptor on the left is relatively recent, as historic Gallup data indicates. For the past 30 years, Americans have been more likely to call themselves “conservative” than “liberal,” but that gap is narrowing. That’s because Democrats — who in the mid-1990s were as likely to use the term “liberal” to describe themselves as “conservative” — have become more likely to use “liberal.” But nearly 4 in 10 still use “moderate” (compared to 2 in 10 Republicans) and 1 in 10 Democrats use “conservative” (twice the percentage of Republicans that use “liberal”).

Republicans have shifted too, but more modestly. In 1994, 6 in 10 described themselves as “conservative.” Now, 7 in 10 do.

But there’s been another shift over the past decade, one that again evokes the story of the frog in its Jacuzzi. What it means to be “conservative” has shifted — perhaps not among purists but certainly among a lot of Americans. Donald Trump has been the Republican nominee for three straight cycles and, as the head of the ticket, has helped reshape the party and redefine right-wing politics.

So by the standard of national politics in 2014, Trump is unquestionably more ideological than Republicans overall. We might not have used “conservative” to describe his politics at the time, since “conservative” was a signifier for Republican spending and social positions. Now it’s a signifier for Trump’s far-right mix of populism, isolationism and xenophobia. And by the standard of the new Trump “conservatism,” Trump is in fact not extreme at all. The water got warmer.

This is probably reflected in an anomaly in the YouGov data: only 6 percent of Republicans said they were “not sure” of Harris’s ideology while 23 percent of Democrats said they were “not sure” of Trump’s. If you see Trump’s ideology as a deviation from what “conservative” long meant, rather than an evolution of it, you might understandably not know how he should be categorized.

Democrats identify themselves as liberal and moderate and see their candidate as liberal or moderate. Republicans identify themselves as conservative and see their candidate as conservative. But presumably in part because Trump has already shifted “conservatism” to the right, his ideology is seen as less fervent than his opponent’s overall.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

As Donald Trump and his allies spread false claims about Hurricanes Helene and Milton, the Republican Party has split into two camps: those who try to dispel the falsehoods, and those who are doubling down on them.

Helene made landfall on Sept. 26, tearing through parts of Florida and Georgia before devastating much of western North Carolina, ultimately causing more than 230 deaths. Milton made landfall Wednesday evening near Sarasota, Fla., bringing powerful winds, tornadoes and deadly floodwaters.

As the country digs out, Republicans in storm-battered states appear torn between the need to curb conspiracy theories and fear of drawing a rebuke from Trump just weeks before the election. Many lawmakers and officials have sought to counter these rumors without directly criticizing the former president or their party.

One of the most prevalent falsehoods spread by Trump is the claim that the Federal Emergency Management Agency, or FEMA, has used some disaster relief funds to help migrants. Though the emergency agency and migrant relief programs are both part of the Department of Homeland Security, their funds are in separate accounts, and money earmarked for aid to migrants can’t be transferred to cover hurricane costs.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), a Trump ally, has also spread the conspiracy that the government controls the weather — a theory with roots in antisemitic tropes about Jewish people manipulating world events.

Far-right conspiracist Alex Jones — who in June was ordered to pay $1.5 billion in damages to the families of Sandy Hook school shooting victims after spreading false conspiracies about the shooting — has spent a few weeks promoting unfounded claims about FEMA and hurricanes in his show Infowars. His live stream shared Wednesday — in which he claimed that Helene was a government-controlled weapon used against Americans — received nearly 600,000 views on the social media platform X.

Some Republicans have sought to discredit such conspiracies, warning that they could erode trust in FEMA and other officials offering lifesaving advice during disasters.

“Hurricane Helene was NOT geoengineered by the government,” Rep. Chuck Edwards, a Republican from hard-hit North Carolina, said in a statement Tuesday. “Nobody can control the weather.”

North Carolina state Sen. Kevin Corbin was among the first GOP officials in the hard-hit region to speak out against the rampant misinformation, decrying the “conspiracy theory junk” in a Facebook post last week. Mayor Glenn Jacobs of Knox County, Tenn., also urged his followers last week to “quit spreading those rumors as they are counterproductive to response efforts.”

Edwards, Corbin and Jacobs all refrained from criticizing Trump or even mentioning the former president. In contrast, Sen. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) specifically slammed Trump on Tuesday for amplifying falsehoods about Haitians eating pets in Springfield, Ohio, and FEMA using disaster money on migrants.

“Trump told us that people in Springfield are eating dogs and cats. He likewise said that FEMA money, our emergency money, instead of helping people that were hit by the hurricane is being used to help illegals,” Romney said during a discussion at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City. “I mean, he just makes it up.”

Falsehoods about FEMA

Trump has repeatedly claimed, without evidence, that FEMA ran out of money for the Helene response because it used the funding on people “who came into the country illegally.” The White House has slammed Trump’s false claim as “poison.”

Asked for comment on Trump’s false claims, Trump campaign spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt repeated them. “The only misinformation is coming from the Biden-Harris administration,” Leavitt said in an email. “White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre lied to the nation Friday when she said it is ‘categorically false’ that FEMA funds are being used to support illegal immigrants.”

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who visited storm-ravaged areas of North Carolina on Wednesday alongside Edwards and the state’s two Republican U.S. senators, Thom Tillis and Ted Budd, defended Trump’s statements in a news conference Wednesday evening. The speaker said the former president “is expressing his frustration about the lack of resources being provided here,” and he repeated the false claims about migrants.

In the same news conference, however, Edwards said that he attributes the “rumors that are out there” about FEMA funding to “good old-fashioned storytelling.”

On Tuesday, Edwards issued a lengthy fact sheet dispelling multiple falsehoods about Helene and FEMA. The fact sheet noted that FEMA “has NOT diverted disaster response funding to the border or foreign aid,” and that NOAA official Charles Konrad has “confirmed that no one has the technology or ability to geoengineer a hurricane.”

Johnson was among the lawmakers who shared Edwards’s fact sheet on X. FEMA also set up a webpage disputing the conspiracies, stating clearly that “no money is being diverted from disaster response needs.”

Weather-control conspiracies

Greene, for her part, has continued to promote her unfounded theory that “they control the weather.” She wrote Wednesday that some of the individuals who allegedly control the weather are “listed on NOAA,” referring to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

In response, Rep. Carlos A. Gimenez (R-Fla.) shot back: “Humans cannot create or control hurricanes. Anyone who thinks they can, needs to have their head examined.”

Asked for comment, Greene spokesman Nick Dyer said the congresswoman was not suggesting that Helene was engineered by humans. He said Greene was merely trying to bring attention to what he called “weather manipulation.”

“Every one of Congresswoman Greene’s critics … want to ignore the science-based factual evidence she has shared,” Dyer said. “They are the ones peddling conspiracy theories about her.”

Greene has apologized for previously embracing the conspiracy theory that the Rothschild family used lasers from space to start wildfires. The Rothschilds, a famous European business dynasty, have repeatedly been subjected to antisemitic allegations that they and other Jews clandestinely manipulate world events for their advantage.

President Joe Biden, during a White House briefing Wednesday, chided those sharing misinformation.

“For the last few weeks, there’s been a reckless, irresponsible, relentless promotion of disinformation and outright lies that are disturbing people,” Biden said. “It’s undermining confidence in the incredible rescue and recovery work that has already been taken and will continue to be taken. It’s harmful to those who need help most.”

Climatologists and weather experts have expressed dismay at the spread of once-fringe conspiracies about hurricanes into the mainstream.

“Yesterday, my mother told me I needed to do ‘deep research’ because everything I know and learned about hurricanes is wrong,” wrote University of Miami climatologist Brian McNoldy, who has long tracked storms in the Atlantic Ocean, on X. “I can’t even process the ignorance and brainwashing.”

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

Former president Donald Trump on Thursday proposed new tax incentives and trade protections aimed at bolstering the U.S. car industry, as he battles Vice President Kamala Harris for crucial votes in the industrial Midwest.

Ahead of a speech at the Economic Club of Detroit, Trump’s campaign announced support for new tax breaks on car loans, expanded tax incentives for U.S.-based car manufacturers and higher tariffs on foreign automobile imports. These proposals come on top of the more than $7 trillion in tax cuts already promised by Trump during the 2024 presidential campaign, which the GOP presidential nominee has not explained how he would pay for.

The pledges reflect the intensifying battle in this November’s presidential election over the upper Midwest and its crucial Electoral College votes. In September, during a speech in Pittsburgh, Harris proposed her own tax incentives aimed at bolstering advanced manufacturing. President Joe Biden has also already aggressively defended U.S. car producers from Chinese electric vehicle imports, although Trump has said he will go even further in erecting new trade barriers.

Despite Trump’s pledges to revive Detroit’s automakers, analysts pointed out that the former president is simultaneously vowing to repeal subsidies approved by Democrats for electric vehicle production as part of their 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. Virtually all U.S. car producers have been moving toward EVs and hybrid vehicles, and repealing those federal incentives would slow progress toward the industry’s future even if Trump implemented his newly proposed tax breaks.

“There’s a contradiction: You can’t go away from EVs while saying you’re going to save the industry. The industry is going to EVs anyway,” said Erin Keating, an analyst at Cox Automotives. “It’s very telling EVs are nowhere to be mentioned here when every company is moving toward them — that is still the long-term product line.”

Brian Riedl, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, a center-right think tank, also pointed out that Trump has vowed special tax breaks to a huge range of constituencies in the final stretch of the presidential campaign, including seniors on Social Security, workers who rely on tips, Americans living abroad and more.

“My first reaction is the Trump campaign seems to be throwing darts at the dartboard for any random populist giveaway for voters without any regard of economic need, coherence or sustainability,” Riedl said.

Trump has accused China of building auto plants in Mexico to sell into U.S. markets, vowing to revoke the trade deal he negotiated with Mexico and Canada should that effort continue. White House National Economic Council Director Lael Brainard also expressed concern in a speech in Detroit last month about foreign “entities of concern” becoming involved in North American auto supply chains.

“You can make the auto industry thrive, bring it back to where it was 50, 60 years ago,” Trump said in his speech Thursday. “And I’m laying out a policy that will absolutely do it in my opinion … My goal is to see U.S. auto manufacturing even greater than it was in its prime, and for Detroit and Michigan to be at the center of the action.”

Harris spokesperson Ian Sams responded to the new proposal by saying Trump was copying Harris, who recently called for revisiting Trump’s trade deal with Canada and Mexico amid concerns over Chinese auto imports to the United States.

After Biden won Michigan closely four years ago, Trump and Harris are neck-in-neck polling in the Rust Belt states. Harris leads in Michigan by two points, according to The Washington Post polling average.

Both candidates have argued they would shore up Michigan’s struggling auto industry. Republicans have warned that the Democratic ticket would mandate the end of gas-powered cars, which Harris has denied. Meanwhile, the Harris campaign has emphasized the Biden administration’s investments in the auto industry, most recently attacking his running mate JD Vance for refusing to say if a Trump White House would maintain a $500 million federal grant to General Motors for an electric vehicle factory in Lansing.

The United Auto Workers, which endorsed Harris, knocked Vance and Trump for their promises to repeal investments from the Inflation Reduction Act. In a media call ahead of Trump’s speech, union leader Shawn Fain said Trump’s economic plan would lead to further plant closures.

“Kamala Harris has an agenda that will invest directly in workers with more training, more plants and more jobs, and our members aren’t going to be fooled by what Donald Trump says in Michigan today or any other day, with our livelihoods on the line this November,” Fain said.

Trump’s plan for the auto industry included new tax incentives for research and development, including manufacturing investments and heavy machinery. The Trump plan also called for allowing Americans to deduct the interest on their car loans, similar to how mortgage interest payments are currently deductible.

But it’s unclear how impactful these plans would be. Very few Americans still itemize their tax returns, in part because Trump’s tax cut doubled the standard deduction, said Keating, the Cox Automotives analyst. “If Trump’s ultimate goal was to save the auto production business in the U.S., none of these assure we start producing more vehicles,” Keating said.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com