Author

admin

Browsing

Vice President Harris is the only candidate who has qualified for the virtual roll call vote to officially select the Democratic presidential nominee.

Electronic voting for the nearly 4,000 Democratic delegates will begin Thursday at 9 a.m. and end Monday at 6 p.m. Harris needs 1,976 votes to secure the nomination and is expected to far surpass that number.

The Democratic National Committee said 3,923 delegates petitioned to put Harris on the ballot for the nomination. No other candidate met the threshold of securing 300 delegate signatures.

Harris is also expected to announce a running mate soon, and when she does the party will declare them the official ticket that will appear on ballots.

Parties traditionally nominate their presidential ticket at a convention, but Democrats chose to hold an earlier vote, citing concerns over ballot access deadlines in some states and an overly litigious Republican Party that could challenge them if they were missed. The Democratic National Convention will be held in Chicago from Aug. 19 to 22.

Election experts have said there’s no evidence to suggest states wouldn’t have worked with the party to ensure their candidates appeared on the ballots.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

Fred Trump III kept silent for years about his uncle, former president Donald Trump. And when his sister, Mary L. Trump, wrote a 2020 bestseller calling their uncle “the world’s most dangerous man,” he called the book “a breach of trust and a violation of our privacy,” adding that “We consider our family matters to be private.”

Yet Tuesday marked the release of Fred Trump III’s own book, in which he does an about-face to take on his uncle and recount a deeply dysfunctional extended family.

The turning point, Fred Trump III said, was an Oval Office conversation about his son William, who has physical and mental disabilities, in which the president said about people with disabilities, “The shape they’re in, all the expenses, maybe those kinds of people should just die.”

That was the last time he talked with his uncle, Fred Trump III said in an interview Tuesday with The Washington Post, setting him on the path to write “All in the Family: The Trumps and How We Got This Way.” He said he planned to vote for the likely Democratic nominee, Vice President Harris, and that, if asked, he would campaign against his uncle and speak at the Democratic National Convention.

“I have stayed quiet for a very long time,” said the 61-year-old Fred Trump III. “I’m one of the only people that knows Donald from his formative years to his business career to the White House.”

With that background, he said, he set out to write “a three-dimensional book. It’s the good, the bad and the jaw-dropping.”

Former president Trump, in a statement to The Post, said he had helped Fred Trump III, contributed to a fund to help William Trump, and also introduced Fred Trump III to government officials from the National Institutes of Health and elsewhere who might be helpful.

“I helped him so much, more than anyone else in his life, and this is the thanks I get. I even set up [a] meeting with NIH and top doctors in the country talking about his son, who is disabled,” Donald Trump said in the statement. He said that Mary Trump “convinced him to do this.”

But Fred Trump III said that he has not talked to Mary since her book published. She could not be reached for comment.

Donald Trump and his spokesman did not respond directly to a question about Fred Trump III’s assertion about his comments regarding disabled people.

Fred Trump III said the book is, by design, a nuanced and somewhat gentler view than his sister’s volume. He recounts the many disputes within the family but saved the toughest comments about Donald Trump and his views on people with disabilities until the final pages. That episode fits his conclusion that Donald Trump has an innate lack of empathy.

The backstory to both Mary and Fred Trump III’s books is Donald Trump’s relationship with their father — his older brother — Fred “Freddie” Trump Jr., who died in 1981 of an alcoholism-related illness at age 42.

Donald Trump, who rarely admits mistakes, told The Post in 2019 that he regrets having tried to press his brother to abandon his work as a TWA pilot and join the family company, telling Fred Jr. “you’re wasting your time.” Donald Trump said in The Post interview that “I do regret having put pressure on him.”

Fred Trump III, asked in the interview whether he blames Donald Trump’s pressure for contributing to his father’s struggles, responded, “Yes, I do,” saying that “my father became an airline pilot flying a 707. You know, in those days, pilots were sort of heroes along with the astronauts.” Instead of accepting his brother’s decision, “Donald continued to beat down my father. And that’s unfortunate,” Fred Trump III said.

When the family patriarch, Fred Trump Sr., died in 1999, years after being diagnosed with dementia, Fred Trump III and his sister, Mary Trump, expected they would receive a portion of the estate that would have gone to their father.

Instead, after Fred Trump III and Mary Trump were told that they would be getting far less than they expected if there had been an equal division of the estate, they sued Donald Trump and two of his siblings, alleging that they had taken advantage of Fred Trump Sr.’s dementia and gotten him to change the will.

Donald Trump and his siblings denied the allegation and responded by cutting off family medical insurance that was crucial for the care of Fred Trump III’s son. Donald Trump said at the time to the New York Daily News, “When [Fred Trump III] sued us, we said, ‘Why should give him medical care?’”

The feud escalated as Fred Trump III said in a court case that Donald Trump and his siblings “thought nothing about taking away my critically ill son’s coverage in an attempt to browbeat me in to abandoning my claim in the probate contest.”

Fred Trump III and his sister, Mary, eventually settled their suit under a confidentiality agreement.

With the publication of Mary’s book, “Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created The World’s Most Dangerous Man,” the first public crack appeared among the Trumps, but no one else in the family joined her criticism. She based her book in part on secret tape recordings of her aunt Maryanne Trump Barry, first reported in 2020 by The Post, in which Donald Trump’s sister said her brother has “no principles” and that “you can’t trust him.”

Fred Trump III, who often visited Barry, wrote in his book that she told him in 2016 that she was writing an op-ed urging people to vote against Donald Trump, but the opinion piece was never published for reasons that are not known. Fred Trump III recalled seeing Barry writing the op-ed on a yellow legal pad and that it said “he’s just not fit to be president.” Barry died in 2023.

Fred Trump III said in the interview that, to this day, he has not read his sister’s book.

While the relationship between Mary and Fred Trump III frayed, he stayed in regular touch with Donald Trump after his 2016 election, visiting him about a dozen times at the Oval Office, he said in the interview, despite differing politics. Fred Trump III said he voted for Democrats Hillary Clinton in 2016 and Joe Biden in 2020 — but refrained from publicly speaking out against his uncle.

He said that Donald Trump voluntarily and regularly contributed an undisclosed amount to a fund to help pay for his son’s medical expenses.

Donald Trump, meanwhile, said in his 2019 interview with The Post that his dispute with Fred Trump III was in the past. “One child was having a difficult time,” Donald Trump said of William. “It was an unfortunate thing. It worked out well, and we all get along.”

But the rapprochement between the former president and his nephew collapsed with Tuesday’s publication of Fred Trump III’s book.

Fred Trump III said that he hopes the book will spark a national conversation about helping families of those with disabilities, including the difficulty of caring for adult children. William is now 25 years old, lives in a group home and is doing relatively well medically, Fred Trump III said, but “we’re still struggle every day” to care for him.

To this day, Donald Trump has never met William, according to Fred Trump III. He believes that is due to a view that anyone “below him” is not a worthy person “unless he needs their vote.”

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump suggested that Vice President Harris wouldn’t be able to stand up to world leaders because of her appearance, adding that he didn’t want to spell it out but viewers would know what he meant.

“She’ll be like a play toy,” Trump — who has a history of using sexist attacks and stereotypes in campaigns against women — said in a Fox News interview with Laura Ingraham, a portion of which aired on Tuesday night. “They look at her and they say, ‘We can’t believe we got so lucky.’ They’re going to walk all over her.”

Trump then turned to look directly at the camera and added: “And I don’t want to say as to why. But a lot of people understand it.”

Trump campaign spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said he was not referring to race or gender and went on to criticize Harris over her record on immigration and other Biden administration policies.

“She is weak, dishonest and dangerously liberal, and that’s why the American people will reject her on November 5th,” Leavitt said.

The Harris campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The pro-Harris super PAC American Bridge 21st Century called Trump’s remark about how Harris would stack up against world leaders “very gross and weird.”

Earlier on Tuesday, the campaign criticized Trump for baselessly accusing Harris, who is married to a Jewish man, of disliking Jewish people.

“Donald Trump is hateful, despicable, and should not be our president,” the campaign said in an unsigned statement. “He roots against America. He insults America. Why would we want to put him in charge of America?”

Elsewhere in the Fox News interview, Ingraham asked Trump how he would improve life for Black women, whom Harris is energizing. Trump responded by saying that Harris would lead to unsafe streets, and “you’re going to have millions of people coming in taking your job and your husband’s job.”

Harris on Tuesday urged Trump to commit to debate her. He has expressed openness to debating but cast doubt on a September date hosted by ABC News that he previously agreed to with President Biden before Biden withdrew from the race.

“Donald, I do hope you’ll reconsider to meet me on the debate stage,” she told a packed arena in Atlanta. “As the saying goes, if you got something to say, say it to my face.”

Trump has habitually criticized the appearance and intelligence of female political opponents, from Carly Fiorina to Hillary Clinton and Nikki Haley. Last week House Republican leaders asked their members not to attack Harris because of her race and identity after several lawmakers dismissed her as a “DEI candidate,” using the abbreviation for “diversity, equity and inclusion.”

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

This week saw the major equity averages continue a confirmed pullback phase, with some of the biggest gainers in the first half of 2024 logging some major losses. Is this one of the most buyable dips of the year? Or is this just the beginning of a protracted decline with much more pain to come for investors?

Today, we’ll walk through four potential outcomes for the S&P 500 index over the next six to eight weeks. As I share each of these four future paths, I’ll describe the market conditions that would likely be involved, and I’ll also share my estimated probability for each scenario.

By the way, we conducted a similar exercise for the S&P 500 back in April, and you may be surprised to see which scenario actually played out!

And remember, the point of this exercise is threefold:

  1. Consider all four potential future paths for the index, think about what would cause each scenario to unfold in terms of the macro drivers, and review what signals/patterns/indicators would confirm the scenario.
  2. Decide which scenario you feel is most likely, and why you think that’s the case. Don’t forget to drop me a comment and let me know your vote!
  3. Think about how each of the four scenarios would impact your current portfolio. How would you manage risk in each case? How and when would you take action to adapt to this new reality?

Let’s start with the most optimistic scenario, involving the S&P 500 making yet another new all-time high as the bullish trend resumes.

Option 1: The Super Bullish Scenario

Our first scenario would mean that the brief pullback phase is now over, and the S&P 500 and Nasdaq would power to new all-time highs in August. By early September, we’d be talking about the resurgence of the Magnificent 7 names, reflecting on how the markets in 2024 have diverged so much from the traditional seasonal patterns, and discussing the likelihood of the S&P finishing 2024 above the 6000 level.

Dave’s Vote: 5%

Option 2: The Mildly Bullish Scenario

What if the Magnificent 7 stocks take a backseat to other sectors, such as financials and industrials? If the value trade continues to work, as we’ve observed in the last couple weeks, we could see a scenario where lots of stocks are working well but it’s not enough to propel the equity benchmarks much higher. The S&P 500 wouldn’t see much downside in this scenario and would spend the next six to eight weeks between 5400 and 5650.

Dave’s vote: 15%

Option 3: The Mildly Bearish Scenario

How about a scenario where this pullback continues to plague the equity markets, but the pace of the decline lightens up a bit? The mega-cap growth stocks continue to struggle, but we don’t see those full risk-off signals and the VIX remains below 20. By early September, we’re down about 10% overall off the July high, but investors are licking their lips about a potential Q4 rally into year-end 2024.

Dave’s vote: 60%

Option 4: The Super Bearish Scenario

You always need to consider an incredibly bearish scenario, if only to remind yourself that it’s a possibility, even a very unlikely one! What if this pullback is just getting started, the S&P 500 fails to hold the 5000 level, and we see a break below the 200-day moving average? That would mean a similar pullback to what we experienced in August and September 2023, and while we’re talking about the potential for a Q4 rally, we’re all way more concerned that there’s even more downside to be had before it’s all said and done.

Dave’s vote: 20%

What probabilities would you assign to each of these four scenarios? Check out the video below, and then drop a comment with which scenario you select and why!

RR#6,

Dave

PS- Ready to upgrade your investment process? Check out my free behavioral investing course!

David Keller, CMT

Chief Market Strategist

StockCharts.com

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional. 

The author does not have a position in mentioned securities at the time of publication.   Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.

Good morning, and welcome to this week’s Flight Path.

Equities had another tough week last week, and we saw an amber “Go Fish” bar for the first time since this latest “Go” trend began. Encouragingly, GoNoGo Trend painted a weak aqua “Go” bar on the last day of the week, but has the damage been done? Treasury bond prices also fell briefly out of the “Go” trend but also ended the week with an aqua “Go” bar. US commodities fell deeper into a “NoGo” as the indicator painted a strong purple bar. The dollar still cannot make up its mind, and we saw a string of “Go Fish” this past week.

SPY Manages To Maintain a “Go” for Now

Price has fallen further since the Go Countertrend Correction Icons that we saw at the top. This week, a “Go Fish” bar was painted as the market expressed its uncertainty. This comes as GoNoGo Oscillator crashed through the zero line into positive territory on heavy volume. We know that in a healthy trend, the oscillator should find support at that level, and so we know now that momentum is out of step with the “Go” trend. We will be wary of more price deterioration here.

A Hint of Weakness on the SPY Weekly Chart 

For the first time in almost three months, SPY did not close in a strong blue bar. We also note the Go Countertrend Correction Icon (red arrow) that appeared at the top. This suggests that price may struggle to move higher in the short term because momentum has waned. We will see if the oscillator finds support at zero as it gets closer.

Treasury Rates in “NoGo” but Paint Weak Pink Bars

This week, we saw a week of uninterrupted pink “NoGo” bars. Price seems to have set a new lower high as we ended the week lower. If we turn our eye to the GoNoGo Oscillator we can see that it is testing the zero line from below. If this NoGo trend is to remain in place we expect to see this level act as resistance. If GoNoGo Oscillator is turned away into negative territory we will look for price to make an attempt at new lows.

Continued Uncertainty for the US Dollar

We’ve been discussing uncertainty in the US dollar for a few weeks now. This week, we saw “Go Fish” bars dominate as price moved mostly sideways. The GoNoGo Oscillator is riding the zero line after rising to it from below. We see a GoNoGo Squeeze climbing to its Max. We will pay close attention to the direction of the break. If the oscillator breaks back into negative territory, then we will look for price to move lower.

This week we have four Magnificent Seven stocks reporting earnings. We also take a look at McDonalds (MCD) and Ford (F) going into earnings. How are the chart technicals setup on the precipice of earnings? Carl and Erin give you there thoughts.

Carl reviews the DP Signal Tables to see how the indexes, sectors, and select industry groups are performing. He gives us his unique take on the market in general and covers Bitcoin’s rise and the weak picture for Gold. He also covers Crude Oil, the US Dollar, US Treasury Yields, and Bonds as well as Gold Miners and Silver.

Erin gives us a complete sector review, diving into the growth sectors leading after difficult declines. She finds new momentum and looks under the hood of many of the sectors including Energy, which had been seeing expansion but is still struggling to make a concerted move higher.

Erin finishes off the trading room by looking at viewer symbol requests on daily and weekly charts.

01:26 DP Signal Tables

03:44 Market Analysis and Overview of major asset classes

01:53 Magnificent Seven and Earnings Preview

23:47 Sector Rotation

36:25 Viewer Symbol Requests

CLICK HERE to save the link to our video playlist where you’ll always find the latest trading room video! Be sure to “Like” our channel and any of the videos you view!


Watch the latest episode of the DecisionPointTrading Room on DP’s YouTube channel here!


Try us out for two weeks with a trial subscription!

Use coupon code: DPTRIAL2 at checkout!


Technical Analysis is a windsock, not a crystal ball. –Carl Swenlin


(c) Copyright 2024 DecisionPoint.com


Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional. Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author, and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.

DecisionPoint is not a registered investment advisor. Investment and trading decisions are solely your responsibility. DecisionPoint newsletters, blogs or website materials should NOT be interpreted as a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security or to take any specific action.


Helpful DecisionPoint Links:

Trend Models

Price Momentum Oscillator (PMO)

On Balance Volume

Swenlin Trading Oscillators (STO-B and STO-V)

ITBM and ITVM

SCTR Ranking

Bear Market Rules


One woman sleeps with a knife under her pillow, in the hope she can protect herself against armed men who might storm her house at night. Another was raped “repeatedly for days” along with her four daughters, while her husband and sons were forced to watch. Another was thrown out of her home and separated from her children after her husband discovered she had become pregnant by rape.

These are among the horrific accounts of sexual violence committed against women and girls in Sudan by the east African country’s warring parties – particularly the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) – in the capital Khartoum since fighting began last year, as detailed in a major report from Human Rights Watch (HRW).

Since civil war broke out in April 2023 between the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and RSF rebels, swaths of the city have been reduced to rubble, as the SAF has bombed civilian neighborhoods to try to dislodge the RSF from its entrenched positions. The conflict has spilled into other parts of the country too, including its western Darfur region.

The United Nations has described the situation in Sudan as “one of the worst humanitarian disasters in recent memory,” with more than 6 million Sudanese internally displaced, 1.5 million seeking safety abroad, and nearly 26 million people – more than half of the population – at risk of famine.

During 15 months of conflict, women and girls in the capital have been subjected to widespread acts of rape, including gang rape, as well as forced marriages and sexual slavery, according to HRW’s 88-page report, titled “Khartoum is Not Safe for Women” and released on July 29.

​​“The Rapid Support Forces have raped, gang raped, and forced into marriage countless women and girls in residential areas in Sudan’s capital,” said Laetitia Bader, deputy Africa director at HRW.

“The armed group has terrorized women and girls and both warring parties have blocked them from getting aid and support services, compounding the harm they face and leaving them to feel that nowhere is safe,” she added.

Due to the difficulty in accessing Khartoum and speaking to survivors directly, HRW instead interviewed 42 healthcare providers, social workers and other responders between September 2023 and February 2024. Of those, 18 had provided direct care to a total of 262 survivors of sexual violence, aged from 9 through 60.

One psychiatrist, who supported more than 40 rape victims between April and November last year, recalled a survivor who had been raped and then discovered she was three months pregnant.

“She was clearly traumatized and shivering – afraid of how her family would react. She said to me, ‘If they discover my situation, they will kill me,’” the psychiatrist said in the HRW report.

Another doctor recounted the ordeal of a woman who said she had been raped by several RSF fighters.

“When the woman found out she was pregnant, her husband expelled her and took away their children. She was left on the streets,” the doctor said.

The woman came to the clinic seeking an abortion but the hospital director did not agree to the procedure, the doctor recalled. Another hospital could not perform the termination because it did not have an obstetrician.

“After the pregnancy exceeded four months, we had to offer her psychological support so that she could accept the condition. It was the only option available to us,” the doctor added.

The report said that “the physical, emotional, social and psychosocial scars left on survivors are immense.” Healthcare workers recalled treating survivors with “debilitating injuries they sustained due to the violence of the rapes and gang rapes, including vaginal bleeding, bruises and other physical trauma.” In at least four cases, these injuries proved fatal.

War crime accusations

Although the report mostly detailed violence committed by RSF forces, it said that some survivors had been scared to report incidents involving SAF soldiers, because they feared the authorities would dismiss their claims.

It also criticized both sides for preventing a comprehensive response to gender-based violence. HRW said the SAF had willfully restricted humanitarian supplies and imposed a de facto blockade on drugs entering the RSF-controlled parts of Khartoum since late last year.

The RSF has also pillaged medical supplies, according to the report, and some fighters “have on occasion perpetrated acts of sexual violence” against healthcare providers. One healthcare provider recalled being told not to report instances of sexual violence to the UN.

“I can kill you right here right now if you want to, you should be careful and stop sending reports,” the fighter reportedly said.

The report’s authors said the documented cases of sexual violence, forced marriage and deliberate attacks on healthcare facilities and providers constitute “a serious violation of international humanitarian law,” as well as war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Despite the severity of the suffering, HRW said there had been “little meaningful regional or international response.” It called on both sides immediately to stop attacks on healthcare facilities and workers and to allow aid to enter conflict zones.

The report added that the UN Security Council should call on the warring parties to end sexual violence and impose targeted sanctions against the commanders and perpetrators responsible for the atrocities.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

South Africa’s former President Jacob Zuma has been expelled from the African National Congress (ANC), the party he once led.

“Former President Jacob Zuma has actively impugned the integrity of the ANC,” ANC Secretary General Comrade Fikile Mbalula outlined at a press briefing on Monday.

“This conduct is irreconcilable with the spirit of organization discipline and letter of the ANC constitution,” Mbalula said, adding that former President Zuma has been running on a dangerous platform that casts doubts on our entire constitutional edifice,”

The expulsion comes after the ANC announced it had suspended Zuma’s membership on January 29 this year, following Zuma’s declaration of support for a newly formed rival political party, uMkhonto WeSizwe Party (MK party), in December 2023.

In January, the ANC stated that the party is dedicated to nurturing and, when required, correcting its members and leaders.

However, as their renewal efforts intensify, individuals like Zuma, whose actions conflict with the party’s values and principles, will find themselves excluded from the ANC.

Mbalula said Zuma has 21 days to appeal the decision.

A series of scandals

Zuma was forced to resign as president in 2018 after a series of corruption scandals and internal infighting in the ANC. He was found guilty of contempt of court by the constitutional court for his refusal to testify to an anti-corruption commission.

In May, the same court ruled unanimously that Zuma was not eligible to run for parliament in the country’s critical general election, capping months of long speculation and legal wrangling on whether the former leader of the ruling ANC would be able to stand for the country’s top legislative body.

Yet, while he was barred from running in this May’s general election, his face remained on the ballot paper for the MK party.

The ANC lost its majority for the first time in 30 years in that election, marking the biggest political shift in the country since the end of apartheid. Support for the ANC dropped to 40.18%, a huge slump from the 57.5% it received in the last election in 2019.

The official opposition party, the centrist Democratic Alliance (DA), received 21.8% of the vote. While Zuma’s MK had nearly 14.59% of the vote.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

At least eight people were stabbed in the northern English town of Southport on Monday, with some of the victims being transferred to a children’s hospital, ambulance officials said.

Merseyside Police said it received reports of a stabbing and emergency services were called to a “major incident” in the town at around 11:50 a.m. local time (6:50aET).

“There are a number of reported casualties and more details will be confirmed when possible. Armed police have detained a male and seized a knife. He has been taken to a police station,” police said in their latest statement. “Please avoid the area while we deal with this incident. There is no wider threat to the public.”

Local business owner Colin Parry was one of the people who called the police, said the incident in Southport was like a “scene in a horror movie,” according to PA Media.

Parry said he believed a number of young girls had been stabbed. “The mothers are coming here now and screaming. It is like a scene from a horror movie,” Parry said, adding that, “police have got him.”

The businessman said he had directed police to an address in Hart Street behind the Hart Space studios, where one of the events listed at the time of the stabbings was a
Taylor Swift-themed yoga class for children ages six to 11, according to its website.

“It’s like something from America, not like sunny Southport,” Parry said.

The Alder Hey Children’s Hospital Trust in Liverpool, about 20 miles from Southport, declared a “major incident.

“The Trust is working with other emergency services to respond to this incident and our Emergency Department is currently extremely busy,” the hospital said in a statement posted to its website. “We ask parents to only bring their children to the Emergency Department if it is urgent,” it said.

The British MP representing Southport, Patrick Hurley says he was “deeply concerned” about the “incident.”

“I am hoping for the best possible outcomes to the casualties affected. My thoughts go out to all those affected, their loved ones and to the entire community,” Hurley said on X.

This is a developing story and will be updated.

Correction: This story has been updated to correct the name of the town where the incident occurred.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

Protests broke out in several Venezuelan cities on Monday after authoritarian leader Nicolás Maduro was formally declared a winner by the county’s electoral authority in a presidential race marred by accusations of electoral fraud.

In the capital of Caracas, protesters blocked roads, while hundreds more were seen walking down a main road banging pots and pans in protest against Maduro’s victory on Sunday. At the city’s main military base, where Maduro lives, people were seen setting fire to the strongman’s election posters.

The next 24 hours will be key in seeing how Maduro responds to the allegations against him. Analysts say there could be a new wave of unrest in the country if there are widespread protests against the regime. Street demonstrations in previous years were crushed by the country’s military, which has long supported Maduro and his predecessor, the late Hugo Chavez.

Maduro smiled as he entered the National Electoral Council (CNE) before a Monday ceremony at which he was declared the winner, receiving cheers and congratulations from many in the audience. The CNE, which is stacked with Maduro allies, has yet to issue final vote tallies from Sunday’s election.

“Venezuela has the best electoral system in the world!” CNE president Elvis Amoroso announced before proceeding with the formal announcement.

But the vote was riddled with claims of irregularities. It included opposition witnesses being denied access to the National Electoral Council (CNE) headquarters as votes were counted and the electoral authority allegedly prevented more votes from being processed.

Maduro’s government controls almost all state institutions, including the CNE, which was accused in 2017 of manipulating turnout figures by a software company that provided the voting technology. The CNE previously denied the assertion.

The opposition coalition, headed by Maria Corina Machado, earlier rejected Maduro’s win, saying the opposition’s records show that opposition candidate Edmundo Gonzalez received 70% of the votes against Maduro’s 30%. “We won, and everyone knows it,” Machado said. The coalition plans on making a statement later on Monday.

Machado is part of a unified opposition movement that overcame their divisions to form a coalition known as the Democratic Unitary Platform. Its energized campaign, which enjoyed strong polling figures prior to Sunday’s vote, was seen as the biggest challenge to Maduro’s rule.

Calls for transparency

The United States is among regional leaders, including Peru and Chile, that have raised questions about the validity of the result.

Brazil, an important regional player, was softer in tone but said it was awaiting “the publication by the National Electoral Council of data broken down by polling station, an essential step for the transparency, credibility, and legitimacy of the election results,” according to a statement by the foreign ministry.

The US on Monday joined Venezuelan civil society groups and the opposition by calling on Venezuela’s government to “immediately” release specific data on the presidential election, citing concerns about the credibility of Maduro’s victory.

Senior Biden administration officials on Monday said Venezuelan election authorities must release the “detailed precinct level results” from the election. One senior administration official noted that this data is required under Venezuela law and should be immediately available. Another said that if the election results are credible, “then this should be a very simple act and one that they would be able to fulfill quite easily.”

“If there is resistance to providing that additional information, then I think that becomes highly problematic when it comes to the ability of the United States or other members of the international community to judge whether these elections were in fact inclusive and credible,” the second official said.

“Our deepest concern at this juncture is that the analysis and data that we have about this election – which is independent from the National Electoral Council results – is at odds with the results as they were announced by the Venezuelan authorities. And so that discrepancy, in our view, needs to be investigated and addressed before we can close the books on this election,” the second official added.

The officials declined to give specifics on the actions the US or international community would be prepared to take if the Venezuelan authorities do not release the data or if the results are determined to be fraudulent, but they did not rule out sanctions.

US sanctions against Venezuela were first imposed in 2017 and gradually increased as the South American country’s political crisis deepened in the following years. The opposition’s accusations cast doubt on Venezuela’s return to the international stage after Maduro pledged last year to hold free and fair elections in US-brokered talks, in exchange for sanctions relief.

The first official said they would begin to have conversations in forums like the Organization of American States (OAS) and the G7 about the “collective way forward.”

This post appeared first on cnn.com