Author

admin

Browsing

Former President Donald Trump falsely claimed on social media Sunday that a crowd at a Michigan rally for Vice President Kamala Harris last week “DIDN’T EXIST,” “nobody was there” and that photos of the event were fabricated by artificial intelligence.

In the days following President Joe Biden’s announcement that he would step aside as the Democratic nominee, conspiracy theorists and far-right influencers have promoted a number of falsehoods targeted at the Harris campaign. But Trump’s repeating of the false claims about the crowd size and photos, with multiple posts on his Truth Social platform, is a notable escalation.

“Has anyone noticed that Kamala CHEATED at the airport? There was nobody at the plane, and she ‘A.I.’d’ it, and showed a massive ‘crowd’ of so-called followers, BUT THEY DIDN’T EXIST!” the Republican nominee for president wrote on social media. Trump continued, “She’s a CHEATER. She had NOBODY waiting, and the ‘crowd’ looked like 10,000 people! Same thing is happening with her fake ‘crowds’ at her speeches. This is the way the Democrats win Elections, by CHEATING.”

There were in fact thousands of people gathered when the plane arrived at the airport, and there is no evidence that news organizations altered photos using artificial intelligence. There is also no evidence that Harris, or Democrats more broadly, have cheated to win elections, despite Trump’s repeated false allegations that the 2020 presidential election was “rigged.”

David Plouffe, a senior adviser for Kamala Harris for President, expressed concern on X, the social media site formerly known as Twitter, about Trump’s comments.

“These are not conspiratorial rantings from the deepest recesses of the internet,” Plouffe wrote. “The author could have the nuclear codes and be responsible for decisions that will affect us all for decades.”

The event last week at an airport hangar in Detroit was live-streamed, widely attended by the media including The Washington Post, and many attendees posted their own pictures and video showing a packed venue. Local news outlet MLive estimated that 15,000 people filled the hangar and that attendees spilled out into the tarmac.

Mallory McMorrow, a Michigan state legislator who was at the event tweeted photos, noting that “you can just see the throngs of people outside.”

On Sunday, the Harris campaign rejected Trump’s comments, writing on the social media site X, “This is an actual photo of a 15,000-person crowd for Harris-Walz in Michigan.”

Trump, the GOP nominee for president, for years has been focused on crowd size as a metric of success. He has repeatedly taken to social media to boast about how the size of crowd he could draw and last week asserted at a news conference that “nobody’s spoken to crowds bigger than me.”

Trump has previously claimed that the audience for a speech he gave in Washington on Jan. 6, 2021, the day a mob stormed the U.S. Capitol, eclipsed the numbers who attended Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech despite photographic evidence that it did not.

Trump has regularly been challenged by fact-checkers and opposition groups for elevating discredited allegations, repeating unfounded rumors as fact, or grabbing onto conspiracies, especially when under political threat.

In 2016, he falsely claimed President Barack Obama was not born in the United States and did not attend Columbia University, that Trump’s taxes were audited because he is Christian, that vaccines are connected to autism and that climate change is a hoax.

In 2020, he refused to advocate for wearing masks during the coronavirus pandemic, and promoted unfounded claims about purported risks.

The Washington Post Fact Checker team in January 2021 noted that it had logged “30,573 untruths during his presidency — averaging about 21 erroneous claims a day.”

Trump’s focus on crowd size also has become something that the Harris campaign has used to poke fun at Trump about — while at the same time bragging about their own crowds.

Democratic vice-presidential nominee Tim Walz at a Friday night rally with Harris, looking at an audience in Arizona that Democrats estimated at more than 15,000, quipped, “It’s not as if anybody cares about crowd sizes or anything.”

On Sunday afternoon, the Harris campaign released a statement describing a crowd of “more than 12,000 Nevadans” at a rally over the weekend — “one of the largest political rallies in modern Nevada political history” — and then described previous audiences as including “14,000+ in Philadelphia, 12,000+ in Eau Claire, and 15,000+ in both Detroit and Arizona.”

And at a fundraising event in San Francisco on Sunday, Harris appeared to address Trump’s social media accusations indirectly.

The energy around the country is “undeniable,” Harris said, adding, “The press and our opponents like to focus on our crowd size, and yes the crowds are large.” But even better, she said, attendees are signing up for volunteer shifts by the thousands.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

A sigh of relief? The US stock market started the week on a pessimistic note, but changed course toward the end of the week, ending in a more positive tone.

Last week’s weaker-than-expected jobs report scared investors into thinking that perhaps the Federal Reserve was too late in cutting interest rates. However, last week’s ISM Services report and Thursday’s jobless claims eased those concerns.

Stock Market Indexes Are Better, Technically

While the charts of the S&P 500 ($SPX), Dow Jones Industrial Average ($INDU), and the Nasdaq Composite ($COMPQ) are showing signs of strength, it’s too early to declare that it’s beginning to rally to the upside. Let’s analyze the charts of all three indexes in more detail and see where they stand.

The Mega-Cap S&P 500 Index

The S&P 500 held the support of its 100-day simple moving average (SMA) and its 50% Fibonacci retracement (from the April low to July high). While the S&P 500 looks like it’s trying to move higher (see chart below), the next resistance level isn’t too far off. The 38.2% Fib retracement at 5400 was a support level for some previous lows. If the S&P 500 reaches that level, the August 2 gap will be filled.

Until the index breaks above the 5400 level, you can’t call this week’s price action a bullish rally. All the more reason to watch the price action in the S&P 500.

CHART 1. DAILY CHART OF THE S&P 500. The index ended the week closing above its 100-day moving average and its 50% Fibonacci retracement level, but it’s too early to call this a bullish move.Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

Tech-Heavy Nasdaq Composite

The Nasdaq Composite is also improving, but hasn’t reached the ranks of the S&P 500. From a technical standpoint, the Nasdaq Composite is approaching its 100-day SMA and 50% Fibonacci retracement level (from April lows to July high), which could act as a resistance level (see chart below). Looking back, you can see that level was a resistance and support level in the past.

CHART 2. DAILY CHART OF NASDAQ COMPOSITE. Watch the resistance level that’s close by. Will the index break through this level, or will it be a resistance level that it’ll have a tough time pushing through?Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average differs slightly from the S&P 500 and Nasdaq, but also looks better technically (see chart below). It peaked on July 18, declined a few days later, and tried to reach the previous peak.

The price action is almost like a double top pattern. What’s interesting is that the index almost reached its measured move lower. The measured move from the July 18 high to July 24 trough was 3.4%. From the chart below, you can see that a 3.4% decline from the July 24 low would bring the index to 38,438. The Dow went as low as 38,499 before moving higher.

Overall, it seems that equities are trying to recover. But will the recovery be sustained?

Recession worries may be in the rearview mirror for a while, but investors continue to walk a fine line. On Monday, the CBOE Volatility Index ($VIX) went as high as 65.73. The last time we saw those levels was in March 2020, when COVID was a concern.

Volatility has come down significantly, but is still above 20. It’s too early to say the market is done with fear; we’ve only started to see a change. Remember, it was just a few days ago when the stock market saw an excessive selloff. Next week, there are important reports on consumer and producer inflation, retail sales, and consumer sentiment.

Inflation Data: What To Know

With rate cut expectations on the radar, you’ll want to stay on top of next week’s inflation data. The Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland estimates a year-over-year percent change of 3.01% for headline CPI and 3.33% for Core CPI. If the data shows that inflation is coming down as it has been in the last few months, investors could sigh a huge relief. Conversely, if the data comes in hotter than expected, it could throw things off. But that’s unlikely since a rate cut in September is very probable. That’s not to say it’s not possible, though.

Watch the price action in bonds ahead of the US inflation data. Bond prices showed signs of leaving the start line but have retreated. The daily chart of the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF TLT below shows the ETF bounced off a support level.

Which direction will TLT move? If the inflation data supports a September rate cut, then TLT will move higher, possibly before the report is released.

Another note is that the CME FedWatch Tool shows the probability of a 50 basis point rate cut in September at 49.5. That’s a significant drop from the end of last week, when the probability was close to 90%.

Closing Position

Proceed with caution. We’ve seen how quickly the market can change direction. Any piece of negative data could send volatility through the roof again. The stock market is hanging on, and the best you can do is note the important support levels in the broader indexes, sectors, and individual equities. If equities can hang on next week, they’ll be on more solid footing. Right now, you need to have a safety net close by.

End-of-Week Wrap-Up

  • S&P 500 closed down 0.04% for the week, at 5344.16, Dow Jones Industrial Average down 0.60% for the week at 39,497.54; Nasdaq Composite closed down 0.18% for the week at 16745.30
  • $VIX down 12.91% for the week closing at 20.37
  • Best performing sector for the week: Industrials
  • Worst performing sector for the week: Materials
  • Top 5 Large Cap SCTR stocks: Insmed Inc. (INSM); Carvana Co. (CVNA); FTAI Aviation Ltd. (FTAI); Sprouts Farmers Market (SFM); SharkNinja, Inc. (SN)

On the Radar Next Week

  • July Producer Price Index (PPI)
  • July Consumer Price Index (CPI)
  • July Retail Sales
  • August Michigan Consumer Sentiment
  • July Housing Starts
  • Fed speeches from Bostic, Harker, Musalem, Goolsbee, 
  • Earnings from Walmart (WMT), Cisco Systems (CSC), Home Depot (HD), among others.

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

The markets extended their corrective move in the previous week; over the past five sessions, the markets remained quite choppy and stayed totally devoid of any definite directional bias. It absorbed a few global jerks and saw gaps on either side of its previous close on different occasions. While the level of 25000 has now almost made itself an intermediate top for the markets, the markets have also appeared to have dragged their most immediate resistance points even lower. Had the markets not seen a rebound on the last trading day of the week, the weekly loss could have been a bit wider. The Nifty oscillated in a 526-point trading range over the past five sessions. The India VIX, the volatility gauge, surged higher by another 7.09% to 15.34. The headline index finally closed with a net weekly loss of 350.20 points (-1.42%).

The coming week is once again a truncated one; August 15th will be a trading holiday on account of Independence Day. From a short-term technical perspective, the derivative data suggest that the markets may continue to remain in a narrow range while they keep finding resistance at higher levels. No trending upmove is likely unless the zone of 24500-24650 is taken out convincingly. On the other hand, the nearest support that exists for the Nifty is the 50-DMA which is presently placed at 23967. By and large, over the next four trading sessions of the week, the index is largely expected to stay in a defined range staying volatile, but devoid of any definite directional bias.

Monday is likely to see a quiet start to the week. The levels of 24550 and 24720 are likely to act as resistance levels for the markets. The supports come in at 24090 and 23900.

The weekly RSI is 68.21; it has slipped below 70 from an overbought zone which is bearish. It otherwise stays neutral and does not show any divergence against the price. The weekly MACD stays bullish and remains above its signal line.

A falling window occurred on candles; this is essentially a gap that generally results in the continuation of the downtrend. However, this needs to be confirmed with the general price action.

The pattern analysis of the weekly chart shows that while the markets have started reverting very slowly back to their mean, this corrective consolidation may still last for some time. For a trending upmove to occur, the Nifty will have to move past the 24500-24750 zone. On the other hand, given the indications given by derivatives data, support exists in the form of maximum PUT OI accumulation at 24000 levels. With the 50-DMA existing at 23967, the zone of 23950-24000 becomes an important support zone for Nifty. If this zone gets violated, then we may see some incremental weakness creeping into the markets.

All in all, the markets are likely to stay highly tentative and are unlikely to see any runaway kind of upmove in the immediate future. So long as they trade below the 24500-24750 zone, all upsides are likely to get sold into; more focus should be on guarding profits at higher levels rather than chasing the up moves. While keeping fresh exposures limited to stocks with improving relative strength, overall leveraged exposures must be kept at modest levels. A cautious outlook is advised for the coming week.


Sector Analysis for the coming week

In our look at Relative Rotation Graphs®, we compared various sectors against CNX500 (NIFTY 500 Index), which represents over 95% of the free float market cap of all the stocks listed.

Relative Rotation Graphs (RRG) continue to show a total lack of leadership among sectors and also some defensive setup building up in the markets. The Nifty Midcap 100 is the only sector index that is present in the leading quadrant.

The Nifty Consumption Index is inside the weakening quadrant; however, it is seeing an improvement in its relative momentum against the broader markets. Besides this, the Nifty Auto, Realty, PSE, and Metal indices are also inside the weakening quadrant.

The Nifty PSU Bank Index continues languishing inside the lagging quadrant of the RRG. Besides this, the Infrastructure Index has rolled inside the lagging quadrant and is now set to underperform the broader markets relatively. The Nifty Energy Index is inside the lagging quadrant but it is seen improving its relative momentum against the broader markets.

The Pharma Index has rolled inside the improving quadrant of the RRG: this is likely to lead to an onset of a phase of potential outperformance from this index. Besides this, the Nifty Media, IT, and FMCG indices are inside the improving quadrant and they continue to get their relative momentum better against the broader markets. The Nifty Financial Services and Nifty Bank Indices are also inside the improving quadrant; however, they are seen giving up on their relative momentum.


Important Note: RRG charts show the relative strength and momentum of a group of stocks. In the above Chart, they show relative performance against NIFTY500 Index (Broader Markets) and should not be used directly as buy or sell signals. 


Milan Vaishnav, CMT, MSTA

Consulting Technical Analyst

www.EquityResearch.asia | www.ChartWizard.ae  

Vladimir Putin fixed the commander in chief of Russia’s military, General Valery Gerasimov, with a cold stare and a look of exasperation. The video, released Wednesday by the Kremlin, showed the Russian president was not happy with news from the southern region of Kursk.

At that moment, hundreds of Ukrainian troops, backed by tanks and protected by air defenses, were advancing into the region. Russian soldiers were surrendering; hundreds of Russian civilians in and around the town of Sudzha were fleeing with anything they could grab.

In two-and-a-half years of warfare, it was an unprecedented Ukrainian incursion into Russia. Putin told the Kremlin meeting that it was “another major provocation” by Kyiv. The region’s acting governor declared a state of emergency, describing the situation as “very difficult.”

Above all, it was humiliating for a Russian state that prides itself on protecting the motherland.

The Kursk attack was an audacious and counter-intuitive move from the Ukrainian military, what one analyst describes as “doing the least obvious thing.”

Despite steadily losing ground in eastern Donetsk, it chose to send elements of experienced brigades into Russian territory, with the apparent goals of embarrassing the Kremlin and forcing the Russian Defense Ministry to redeploy resources and providing the home front with a much-needed morale boost.

George Barros at the Washington-based Institute for the Study of War says the Ukrainians “achieved operational surprise against great odds and are currently exploiting Russia’s lack of readiness in its border areas.” (The same tactic worked in September 2022 when they recovered much of occupied Kharkiv region within a week.)

The Russian regiment tasked with defending this part of the border abandoned its positions. Several dozen soldiers were taken captive, leading President Volodymyr Zelensky to express Friday “special gratitude to our warriors and units who are replenishing the ‘exchange fund’ – by taking the occupiers as captives and thus helping to free our people from Russian captivity.”

A column of Russian reinforcements was taken out by a missile attack near the town of Rylsk on Thursday night, possibly because the Ukrainians had managed to hack into multiple traffic cameras that are a feature of Russian highways. One Russian blogger, Aleksander Kots, said he had driven the route. “I noticed that there are cameras working along the entire highway. They are literally blinking their lights.”

Meeting little resistance, and with Russian communications in the region reportedly jammed by effective electronic warfare, the Ukrainian brigades pushed more than 20 kilometers (12 miles) inside Kursk in the first two days of the operation.

This wasn’t just a patch of empty Russian countryside. Among the places that came under Ukrainian control was a natural gas transit hub near the border through which Russia supplies Europe with substantial volumes of natural gas.

On Friday, a Ukrainian military Telegram channel declared the facility “under the control of the 99th mechanised battalion of the 61st Mechanized Brigade,” one of the experienced units involved in the assault. A video showed soldiers in front of the building, but Gazprom said Saturday that the pipeline was still operating.

Inside Russia, the sort of anger that had greeted setbacks at the beginning of the war was rekindled.

Andrey Gurulyov, a former commander in the region, reposted a comment on Telegram that demanded military prosecutors investigate decisions by commanders to transfer units from the Kursk region ahead of the attack.

And there was resentment amongst Russian civilians in the region, thousands of whom fled their homes. The head of the city of Rylsk – some distance from the most advanced Ukrainian units – said Friday more than half the population of 15,000 had left. Social media videos illustrated the frustration among civilians at the sluggish response of the military; some appealed directly to President Putin.

An expeditionary force

Ukrainian troops, even if reinforced, cannot expect to occupy several hundred square kilometers of Russian territory. This is very much an expeditionary force, albeit a battle-hardened one, that has exploited the absence of organized resistance to make ground quickly.

But holding a large chunk Russian territory is beyond their capacity and probably beyond their goal. Russian reinforcements will eventually make their mark, even if it takes them longer than three days to begin effective defense. On Saturday, the Russian Defense Ministry said units had “thwarted the attempts of the enemy’s mobile groups to get to the depth” of Russian territory near Ivashkovsky, Malaya Loknya, and Olgovka in the Kursk region. Olgovka is 20 kilometers (12.4 miles) from the border.

There were also signs Saturday that Russian “Lancet” drones were beginning to degrade Ukrainian armour.

Emil Kastehelmi at the Black Bird group in Finland, which uses open-source intelligence to track the conflict says “time is running against Ukrainians – (the) Russians won’t be disorganized forever.”

Even if the Ukrainians need to pull back from more advanced positions, such an operation still serves several purposes. Barros says it “exposes some of Russia’s planning assumptions and critical vulnerabilities.” And Matthew Schmidt, who has taught strategic and operational planning at the US Army’s Command and General Staff College, said the Ukrainians’ “creative use of force was designed to put pressure on the decision-makers in Moscow” – and possibly cost some of them their jobs.

Russian military blogger Vladislav Shurygin crystallized all this in a Telegram post Friday, saying that the enemy had “very skilfully and accurately chosen a different strategy – taking advantage of the bureaucratic rigidity and sluggishness of the Russian management system, to exhaust Russia with continuous unexpected strikes on sensitive infrastructure and the civilian population, provoking discontent, disappointment and apathy.”

The Kursk operation also demonstrates to Ukraine’s allies that it still has the energy and imagination to surprise its enemy and embarrass the Kremlin at a time when much of the news from the frontline was bleak for Kyiv.

That’s not lost on Shurygin. “The goal of this new strategy is to put Russia before the prospect of an increasingly costly war (financially, reputationally and organizationally) and to force it to negotiate peace by November-December.”

Daniel Fried at the Atlantic Council says there is a long history of such surprise military raids – some inconsequential and others impactful. He recalls George Washington’s daring maneuver to cross the Delaware River in 1776, when he returned with captured prisoners and supplies and raised morale for the fight against the British.

Fried, a former US assistant secretary of state for Europe, says that by demonstrating Russia’s failure of intelligence and weakness along its border, the raid had punctured the Kremlin’s narrative “that Ukrainian resistance is useless and support for Ukraine is futile.”

Ukraine’s Kursk gambit forces the Russian Defense Ministry into some tough choices. It appears that existing groups in Kursk such as the National Guard, FSB and irregular elements are unable to combat the Ukrainians.

Alternatively, it may call on Russia’s substantial reserves in a larger-scale operation – but these are critical for current Russian offensive operations inside Ukraine, where the continuous commitment of high numbers of troops has eroded Ukrainian defenses.

Or, Barros says, the Russians may turn to aviation to attack Ukrainian armor inside Kursk, thereby preventing Ukrainian forces from consolidating positions and assisting current Russian forces deployed in the area.

Whatever combination the Russians choose, they are trying to reverse a humiliating episode in the conflict just as sheer mass and air superiority in eastern Donetsk was beginning to deliver incremental progress, underpinning the Kremlin’s insistence that Ukraine give up four eastern regions as a condition for negotiations.

Across a southern border with Ukraine that is hundreds of miles long, that perception has been seriously, and unexpectedly, challenged.

Darya Tarasova and Maria Kostenko contributed reporting to this story.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

A landslide at a landfill in Uganda’s capital Kampala has killed eight people, the city’s authorities said on Saturday.

The incident happened late Friday after heavy rainfall when sections of the landfill collapsed, covering some nearby houses, Ugandan media reported.

Kampala Capital City Authority said government and Red Cross personnel were searching the site and had rescued 14 people.

“On a very sad note, eight people have so far been found dead, six adults and two children. The rescue operation is still ongoing …,” the authority said on its X account.

The landfill, known as Kiteezi, has served as Kampala’s sole garbage dump for decades and had turned into a big hill. Residents have long complained of hazardous waste from the site polluting the environment and posing a danger to people.

Footage from NTV Uganda television showed people walking on a section of the landfill that had crushed parts of a house, while pictures from UBC Uganda showed an excavator attempting to dig up garbage.

Parts of Uganda have been experiencing heavy rains in recent weeks causing flooding and landslides, though no fatalities had previously been reported.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

Belarus sent military reinforcements to its border with Ukraine Saturday after it said several Ukrainian drones crossed its airspace and were intercepted by the country’s air defenses on Friday, Belarusian Defense Minister Viktor Khrenin said in a statement.

“We suspect these are attack drones,” Belarusian president Alexander Lukashenko said during a separate briefing Saturday. He called the incident “a provocation” and said “the general staff of Belarus has been ordered to take relevant measures to ensure the security of the state.”

“Ukrainians show in this way that they are not ready for peace and continue to escalate this tension,” Lukashenko said, speaking of the recent Ukrainian incursion into Russian territory.

Khrenin told journalists “considering the situation in Ukraine and in the Kursk region of Russia” Lukashenko “has ordered to strengthen the grouping of troops” in the Gomel and Mozyr areas bordering Ukraine “in order to respond” to Ukrainian “provocations.”

“Military units of special operations forces, ground troops and rocket forces, including ‘Polonez’ systems and ‘Iskander’ (ballistic missile) complexes, have been tasked with marching to the designated areas. Air defense, rocket defense and aviation forces and assets have been built-up,” Khrenin said.

On Saturday, the Belarusian Foreign Ministry summoned the Charge d’Affaires of Ukraine and “lodged a strong protest” in connection with the incident, the ministry said in a post on X.

“The Ukrainian diplomat was warned that in case of repetition of such provocations #Belarus reserves the right to take retaliatory steps to protect its territory,” the ministry said, adding it “may question the necessity of the continued presence of the #Ukrainian diplomatic mission in Minsk.”

The ministry blamed Ukraine for “criminal actions” to “radically escalate the situation and represent a dangerous attempt to expand the zone of the current conflict in our region.” It asked the rest of Europe to not escalate the situation.

Ukraine has not publicly commented on Belarus’ accusations.

“We appeal to the peoples of neighboring Europe: in the event of an expansion of the conflict, the fire will spread throughout the region, including to the EU countries. There will be no winners!” the ministry said on X.

Belarusian state media BelTA said Saturday the Foreign Ministry will initiate consultations with allies and partners, as well as international organizations following the incident.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

Men who deceitfully break off promises of marriage after having sex with a woman could face up to 10 years in prison, as Indian law grapples with a widespread but often ignored form of sexual abuse.

But the new law has also provoked questions about how it will be applied, whether it can effectively protect women from sexual exploitation and whether it risks criminalizing break-ups.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government introduced a new criminal code in early July, replacing India’s 164-year-old colonial-era penal code.

Section 69 of the new statute criminalizes having sex with a woman “by making a promise to marry (her) without any intention of” doing so, or by “deceitful means” such as falsely promising career advancement or marrying under a fake identity.

The crime is punishable by up to 10 years’ imprisonment and a fine.

Though the law is new, the concept is not – many women have previously brought such cases to court, accusing men of luring them into sexual relationships by dangling promises of marriage.

Indian society has generally conservative attitudes towards sex, with a strong emphasis on female virginity and often pricy dowry negotiations attached to unions. Premarital and extramarital sex therefore remain taboo for many – and any suggestion of impropriety may make it more difficult for a woman to secure a marriage.

Audrey Dmello, director of Majlis Law, a women’s rights NGO in India, supports the new law. She argues “promise to marry” rape cases are under-reported and needed to be tackled through legislation.

Conflicting rulings

Under the old penal code, courts have previously ruled that having sex under false pretenses is not consensual, giving rise to rape convictions.

But judges have issued conflicting rulings on “promise to marriage” cases, something the new law is trying to address.

In 2019, the Supreme Court heard a case where the plaintiff alleged rape after having been in a long-term romantic and sexual relationship with the defendant, who later expressed reservations about getting married due to caste differences, as detailed in court documents.

India’s caste system was officially abolished in 1950, but the 2,000-year-old social hierarchy still exists in many aspects of life. The caste system categorizes Hindus at birth, defining their place in society, what jobs they can do and who they can marry.

The man in the 2019 case was acquitted, with the court ruling that a broken promise was different to a false promise of marriage: the man had to have made the promise with no intention of fulfilling it from the start. Since the woman continued the relationship even knowing there were obstacles to them getting married, it didn’t count as rape, the court ruled.

However, in the same year India’s top court gave a different ruling in a similar case. It upheld the rape conviction by a doctor in the central state of Chhattisgarh because he had a sexual relationship with a woman after he’d promised to marry her, but then broke his promise and married someone else, according to court documents.

He was sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment and a fine of 50,000 rupees (about $600).

These different rulings show “even the judges are confused,” said Tanvir Siddiki, a legal advocate based in Varanasi.

“You can see that the (one court) is saying one thing, and the Supreme Court of India is saying another thing on the very issue of ‘promise of marriage,’” he added.

Potential concerns

The new law distinguishes “promise to marry” cases from rape – but some lawyers say the parameters are still vague.

Some have questioned how the law will be implemented, arguing that it will be difficult to prove deceit and the intention to marry in court.

“How can one prove a person’s intention? In the real world, even if such a situation occurs the accused would only tell his true intentions to his confidant, he wouldn’t tell the victim that,” said Gopal Krishna, a legal advocate in Varanasi and a legal coordinator for a local NGO for women, Guria India.

Siddiki added that under the previous penal code, rape victims – including those in “promise to marriage” cases – were required to undergo medical exams, which are no longer required under the new class of case.

“Without this, how will the prosecution then prove that the victim was sexually exploited?” he said.

Mixed opinions

Some younger Indians have voiced skepticism over the law’s relevance in today’s increasingly progressive India where traditions of arranged marriages and historic conservative attitudes towards dating and pre-marital sex are shifting, especially in more urban and middle-class communities.

“We’re living in a time where people are becoming modern and are choosing to stay in relationships without wanting to get married,” said Durjoy Biswas, a 21-year-old resident of Kolkata in West Bengal state.

And 19-year-old Delhi resident Vanshika Bhattad questioned what role the law should play when it comes to sex among two consenting adults.

“Even if the guy is lying about marriage, having sexual intercourse is the consent of both parties, the emphasis should be on consent. If someone forcefully has sex with a girl then it is rape,” he said.

But while many social media users have voiced fear over the potential abuse of Section 69 against men, Dmello of Majlis Law argued that the law empowers women and places them on equal footing with men.

“In our society, we always tell women to do this and that – do not go out at night, do not wear such clothes,” she said. “The tables have turned now.”

This post appeared first on cnn.com

DETROIT — Automaker Stellantis plans to indefinitely lay off up to 2,450 U.S. factory workers later this year as it discontinues production of an older version of its Ram 1500 pickup truck in Michigan.

The truck has been largely used as a low-cost pickup to sell to entry-level buyers and fleet customers since the automaker introduced a new generation of the Ram 1500 in 2018. It is produced alongside the Jeep Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer at the Warren Truck Assembly Plant, located near Detroit.

The current Ram 1500, which was recently updated for the 2025 model year, is produced at a nearby plant. Operations at that facility will continue as planned.

“With the introduction of the new Ram 1500, production of the Ram 1500 Classic at the Warren [Michigan] Truck Assembly Plant will come to an end later this year,” the company said in an emailed statement.

The discontinuation of the Ram 1500 “Classic” vehicle is not unexpected, but the company has not announced a vehicle to replace the truck. That is concerning for local governments, workers and the United Auto Workers union, which represents the plant.

A spokesman for the union did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

Ram CEO Chris Feuell told CNBC last week that the “Classic” version of the pickup would be phased out by the end of this year.

ThWe’ll e layoffs are expected to start as soon as October. The final number of indefinite layoffs at the Warren plant, which currently employs about 3,700 hourly workers, may be lower than the announced numbers. Some employees may be given other jobs or positions at other plants.

The layoffs are the latest for Stellantis, which has cut production at several plants amid sales issues and cost-cutting measures.

Stellantis CEO Carlos Tavares has been on a cost-cutting mission since the company was formed through a merger between Fiat Chrysler and France’s PSA Groupe in January 2021. It is part of his “Dare Forward 2030” plan to increase profits and double revenue to 300 billion euros, or $325 billion, by 2030.

The automaker last week offered a broad voluntary buyout to U.S. salaried workers in an effort to reduce headcount and costs. Stellantis, which reported disappointing first-half results last month, said if not enough employees participate in the buyout, involuntary terminations could follow. 

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

The Federal Reserve is gearing up to cut interest rates as soon as next month, which could bring relief to people with mortgages, credit cards and car loans. But it could be a bumpy ride until then.

A weaker-than-expected jobs report Friday triggered a sell-off on Wall Street this week from which markets are struggling to recover. And there’s still uncertainty around how deeply the central bank might slash rates, if it does so as expected when it meets in mid-September. Many consumers are looking for some financial stability in the short term while planning to benefit from lower borrowing costs in the medium to long terms.

That balancing act isn’t easy, Bankrate senior economic analyst Mark Hamrick acknowledged. “We should hope for the best,” he said, but “prepare for some possible outcomes that are less than optimal.”

Here are some financial do’s and don’ts experts suggest in the meantime.

Now’s still a good time to stash money in accounts paying generous interest.

“Circumstances can occur that are damaging to our personal finances, outside of recessions” or stock market turbulence, said Hamrick, who noted that nearly 60% of U.S. adults are uncomfortable with their current emergency savings. “How we prepare for those things, including how much savings we’re either inclined to or able to put away, are ultimately what helps us to manage through those difficulties.”

Most analysts don’t expect the Fed to cut its benchmark rate more than 0.5 percentage points initially. That means high-yield savings accounts — for which some of the best rates top out at 5.35% — are likely to remain appealing.

Certificates of deposit — fixed-rate bank accounts with term limits — are a go-to when interest rates are high. Some are paying interest at levels that rival those of high-yield savings accounts, and it may seem smart to lock in a 5% yield for many months after the Fed starts lowering rates. But several experts cautioned against over-relying on high-yield CDs.

If you’re close to retirement or have a fixed income, a short-term CD of a year or two might be an “attractive option” to take advantage of interest rates, said Rodney Lake, director of the GW Investment Institute at the George Washington University School of Business.

But “you really have to factor in your time horizon,” he said, because much longer than that could mean lost opportunities to reinvest those funds elsewhere with higher returns.

In addition, cashing out a CD early usually entails a penalty. So “if there’s any chance you might need it, buyer beware,” said Laura Veldkamp, a finance professor at Columbia University’s Graduate School of Business.

Now’s the time to pay down card balances, experts said. Chipping away at your debt and improving your credit score can position you to take advantage of better borrowing conditions.

With interest rates coming down, the idea is just pay and save as much as you can right now.

Laura Veldkamp, Columbia Business School

“With interest rates coming down, the idea is just pay and save as much as you can right now and have that consumption party” later, Veldkamp said. “That’s the sort of timing play here.”

Credit card balances are typically most consumers’ highest-rate debt. While the ratio between U.S. households’ average debt and income remains historically low, credit card delinquency rates have been rising, and those behind on payments face larger balances, Philadelphia Fed researchers said last month.

“Make all your payments on time” if you’re able to, Veldkamp advised. “Be really diligent about it, so that when it comes time to borrow, one looks like a good candidate and can get a good rate.”

Simply asking about discounts and special promotions — from utility bills to prescription costs — can yield surprising results, and credit card rates are no different, Hamrick said: Pick up the phone and see what your card issuer can do.

There’s no bad time to do that, but when the central bank lowers interest rates, it can be even more valuable. That’s especially true if your credit card has a variable APR, because not all lenders will quickly or automatically lower it after a Fed cut.

“Not to say they do it on purpose, but maybe they forget to reset your rate down,” Lake said. “Make sure that you hold those people accountable.”

It might seem counterintuitive to buy stock in the wake of this week’s rout, but many financial advisers live by the “buy low, sell high” mantra. If your experience as an investor is nonexistent or limited to your employer’s 401(k), consider opening an investment account and start small, Veldkamp suggested.

“You don’t have to be a millionaire to have a stock portfolio. Find a simple platform with low fees and buy some things,” she said. For an inexperienced investor without plans to retire any time soon, the key is patience. Over the long term, “if the market crashes, it will rebound,” she said.

Fluctuations often motivate investors to take matters into their own hands, but Veldkamp said few tend to outsmart the market.

“It’s tempting to say, ‘Well, when interest rates go down, stocks are going to do well, because people are switching from low-return to higher-return assets,’” she said. “That all may be true, but the fact is that there’s somebody whose job it is to trade on that idea immediately. The second a word exits the mouth of a Federal Reserve official, they are there ready to execute that trade in milliseconds.”

Instead, experts advise keeping a steady, long-haul approach.

“If you’re investing in your retirement, for example, you should be really focused on what the next five, 10 and 20 years look like. You’re investing for those periods,” Lake said.

With 30-year fixed-rate mortgage rates plunging this week to an average of 6.55%, refinancing demand has surged 16%, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association.

If you’re buying a house and getting into a mortgage, check to see if rates fall can you adjust that mortgage rate.

Jude Boudreaux, Financial Planner, New Orleans

While a Fed interest rate cut would drive mortgage rates lower still, now’s a great time for existing homeowners and prospective ones to scope out their refinancing options, Veldkamp said: “Dig up those details, do your homework, read the fine print and figure out what’s that refinancing cost.”

Jude Boudreaux, a New Orleans-based financial planner, pointed out that most closings take 30 to 60 days, so it’s worth looking ahead even if you’re still in the middle of a sale process.

“If you’re buying a house and getting into a mortgage, check to see if rates fall can you adjust that mortgage rate,” Boudreaux said. “As you’re shopping for a loan, that becomes something to consider.”

However, Lake warned against looking only at interest rates to time a home purchase, particularly because homebuying demand could jump after a rate cut.

“People should really focus on their individual needs and desires and what they can afford,” he said. “As soon as rates go down, people have more borrowing capacity, so they get pretty quickly reflected in the real estate prices.”

The bad news: “It is doubtful that auto rates will rapidly decline as soon as the Fed starts cutting,” Jonathan Smoke, Cox Automotive’s chief economist, wrote following the Fed’s decision last month to hold rates steady.

The average rate for new vehicles in July was 9.72%, up more than 0.5% year over year but down from 10% in June, Cox said. And the average monthly auto loan payment was $727, said J.D. Power, $5 more than in July 2023.

The good news: Consumers should find plenty of deals in the discounting that typically picks up in August and September as dealers clear lots for new models, Boudreaux said.

Hybrid sales are finally slowing after a springtime surge, according to the auto data firm Edmunds, which means better prices are also likely to be around the corner. And in the secondhand market, one- and two-year-old used car values are down nearly $4,000 from last year.

“If you’re shopping for a new car deal, it might actually be on the other side of the lot,” said Ivan Drury, director of insights at Edmunds.

Delaying that trip to the dealership can be costly, Hamrick said, especially when it means spending more on Uber rides or missing work because of a lack of wheels. So focus on what you can afford and “bulletproof” your budget for maintenance, repairs and fuel. Chances are that auto purchase will still be net-positive on your wallet.

Hamrick also suggested considering leasing options, even if that means signing a contract before a rate cut. “Maybe you need to trade down on the price point,” he said.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

The 2019 state budget negotiations in Minnesota were tense, with a deadline looming, when the speaker of the House offered Gov. Tim Walz a suggestion for breaking the impasse.

They both knew that the Republicans’ top priority was to create a school voucher-type program that would direct tax dollars to help families pay for private schools. House Speaker Melissa Hortman, a Democrat, floated an idea: What if they offered the Republicans a paired-down version of the voucher plan, some sort of “fig leaf,” that could help them claim a symbolic victory in trade for big wins on the Democratic side? In the past, on other issues, Walz had been open to that kind of compromise, Hortman said.

This time, it was a “hard no.”

“It was like kind of ‘Over my dead body,’” she recalled in an interview. “He would have shut down state government if they insisted on vouchers.”

Since taking office as governor in 2019, Walz, the Democratic nominee for vice president, has earned a national reputation as a progressive willing to champion and experiment with liberal ideas for governing. That approach was especially apparent in his handling of Minnesota’s public schools, according to critics and allies, who said Walz has retained the heart and priorities of the teacher he was for nearly two decades before seeking elected office.

He used his position’s formidable sway over education to push for more funding for schools and backed positions taken by Education Minnesota, the state’s teachers union of which he was once a member. His record on education will probably excite Democrats but provide grist for Republicans who have in recent years gained political ground with complaints about how liberals have managed schools.

Teachers and their unions consistently supported Walz’s Minnesota campaigns with donations, records show. And in the first 24 hours after he was selected as Vice President Kamala Harris’s running mate, teachers were the most common profession in the flood of donations to the Democratic ticket, according to the campaign.

During the chaotic 2020-21 pandemic-rattled school year, Walz took a cautious approach toward school reopening that was largely in line with teachers, who were resisting a return to in-person learning, fearful of contracting covid. Critics say that as a result, Minnesota schools stayed closed far too long — longer than the typical state — inflicting lasting academic and social emotional damage on students.

Asked about the covid response, Harris-Walz campaign spokesman Kevin Munoz shifted the blame to Donald Trump, who was president at the time: “Schools were closed because Trump failed on Covid.”

He added that Harris and Walz would be far better for American education than their opponents.

“They will fight for a strong public education system, schools safe from gun violence and investing in every community,” he said. “It’s a stark contrast to Trump and (JD) Vance.”

Walz also advanced his own robust and liberal education agenda. He fought to increase K-12 education spending in 2019, when he won increases in negotiations with Republicans, and more dramatically in 2023, when he worked with the Democratic majority in the state House and Senate. He won funding to provide free meals to all schoolchildren, regardless of income, and free college tuition for students — including undocumented immigrants — whose families earn less than $80,000 per year. He also called out racial gaps in achievement and discipline in schools and tried to address them.

And as culture war debates raged across the country in recent years, Walz pushed Minnesota to adopt policies in support of LGBTQ+ rights.

“He understands what our schools and students need,” said Jake Schwitzer, executive director of North Star Policy Action, a liberal research and advocacy group that is funded in large part by labor unions. “He believes in the power of government to improve people’s lives and in his responsibility to move our policies in that direction.”

Walz’s sweeping agenda has been met with pushback from conservatives, who point to falling test scores to argue that he was focused on the wrong issues and catering to the teachers union.

Scores fell across the country during the pandemic, but in Minnesota, reading and, in particular, math scores fell more than the national average. In 2015 and 2017, the state’s fourth-grade math scores were 10 points higher than the average national score on the National Assessment of Educational Progress; in 2022, they were only four points higher. Eighth-grade math scores also fell faster than average, to their lowest level in three decades.

Cristine Trooien, a mother of three and executive director of education advocacy group the Minnesota Parents Alliance, which formed in 2022 to fight for parents’ rights in education, argued that public schooling in her state “has literally never been worse.”

“Sadly for Minnesota students, the union-controlled Walz administration decided it would rather use its power, influence and bottomless resources to saturate the K-12 conversation with straw man issues like ‘book banning,’” she said in an email, “than confront and solve the literacy and student achievement crisis.”

Delivering for teachers

When Walz first ran for governor in 2018, he filled out a 13-page questionnaire from Education Minnesota and left no doubt about his position opposing vouchers.

“As a former public school teacher, I will always do everything in my power to protect our public education system from privatization,” he wrote.

His promise was quickly put to the test.

During budget negotiations in 2019, Republicans were pushing for a variety of tax cuts, but their top priority was a tax credit for donations to a scholarship program — a type of voucher program used in many other states. They argued it would give students stuck in poorly performing schools more options. Teachers and most Democrats opposed it, saying vouchers drain money from public schools and improperly mix tax dollars with religious private school instruction.

As the budget deadline approached, Republican Paul Gazelka, the Senate majority leader at the time and one of Walz’s staunchest political opponents, continued to press his voucher plan but met unyielding resistance.

Hortman recalled that at a point during their closed-door talks, the governor replied, “You know I’m a member of Education Minnesota, right?” (He actually was no longer a member but had been as a teacher.)

Gazelka walked away frustrated.

“I was willing to give up a lot to get that, but it just didn’t happen,” Gazelka said. “We just weren’t asking that much, but that’s how passionate he was against any kind of education reform. He would never go against the teachers union.”

Four years later, Walz pressed his own education agenda.

In the 2022 elections, Walz was reelected, and Minnesota Democrats took control of the Senate. Democrats now had a “trifecta” — governor, House and Senate — and a $17.6 billion budget surplus.

After taking his oath of office in January 2023, Walz said Minnesota had a historic opportunity to become the best state in the nation for children and families. His proposals included a huge increase in K-12 education spending.

“Now is the time to be bold,” he said.

The final budget agreement in 2023 increased education spending by nearly $2.3 billion, including a significant boost to the per-pupil funding formula that would be tied to inflation, ensuring growth in the coming years. Total formula funding for schools would climb from about $9.9 billion in 2023 to $11.4 billion in 2025, according to North Star Policy Action. The budget also included targeted money for special education, pre-K programs, mental health and community schools.

Walz also signed legislation providing free school meals for all students — a signature achievement — not just those in low-income families who are eligible under the federal program.

“Our union came to him with a pretty big list,” said Denise Specht, president of Education Minnesota. “He certainly delivered.”

A covid shutdown

Like every state, Minnesota shut down its schools in March 2020 in response to the coronavirus. As the pandemic persisted, resistance to the state’s response grew.

For the 2020-21 school year, the governor left decisions on reopening partly up to school districts. But he also mandated that, in order for schools to reopen fully, localities had to see their virus cases fall below 10 per 10,000 people over a two-week period. That meant that some school districts — including big ones in Minneapolis and St. Paul — would stay remote, or mostly remote, for months.

He loosened these restrictions near the end of 2020, allowing elementary schools to reopen in January 2021 regardless of case counts. The month afterward, he permitted all middle and high schools to open back up, too, and declared every campus must offer some in-person teaching by March 8.

By March 2021 — a full year after the initial shutdowns — 90 percent of Minnesota districts and charter schools were offering at least partial in-person instruction, according to Walz’s office.

Minnesota schools remained remote longer than average among states, said Nat Malkus, a researcher at the American Enterprise Institute who has analyzed the length of time districts remained remote during the 2020-21 school year. In Malkus’s ranking of states — from most remote learning to most in person — Minnesota came in 19th out of 50 states, based on the number of weeks of full or partly remote school, weighted by student enrollment.

The state’s ranking is “not too bad,” Malkus said. “That makes it somewhat worse than average, but better than average for blue states.”

Critics, both then and since, said Walz made it too difficult for schools to reopen, inflicting irreparable damage on children’s academics and mental health.

In fall 2020, a mother of five, distressed by school closures and a pause of youth sports statewide, founded an advocacy group called Let Them Play Minnesota. The group soon swelled to 25,000 members and sued Walz twice over the sports halt, although both suits were later dismissed. The mother, Dawn Gillman, a Republican, rode the following she gained for her advocacy to a seat in the Minnesota House.

A few months later, Republicans in the Minnesota Senate rebuked Walz for school closures by proposing a bill that would have stripped the governor of the emergency powers he used to close campuses. The measure passed the Republican-dominated chamber but died in the Democratic-controlled House.

Some schools also tried to resist.

Sibley East Public Schools, a rural district southwest of the Twin Cities, voted in September 2020 to ignore the state’s reopening restrictions and shift to in-person instruction for all students — only to back down a week later and resume hybrid schooling. The district fell in line after the state schools superintendent called the Sibley East superintendent, the Star Tribune reported, and the district’s attorney warned of a possible legal battle with the state.

How things played out in Sibley East was typical of the governor’s pandemic policies, said Scott Jensen, a Republican and former Minnesota state senator who lost to Walz in the 2022 gubernatorial race.

“Tim Walz gave the public impression he was letting individual school districts make the decision they needed to make, but I don’t think that was quite genuine,” Jensen said. “I think school districts felt a tremendous amount of pressure to toe the line.”

But Walz enjoyed the strong and continued support of teachers’ unions for most of his pandemic decisions.

He pursued teacher-friendly policies, issuing an executive order that “strongly” discouraged schools from asking educators to provide in-person and virtual instruction simultaneously, a form of teaching that many found burdensome. The order also mandated that districts give teachers an extra 30 minutes of planning time a day. And like a handful of other states, he put educators near the top of the priority list for covid vaccinations once they became available, holding mass vaccination events for them. As a result, 55 percent of school staff and child-care workers were vaccinated by March 2021. His administration also delivered biweekly, free shipments of coronavirus tests to schools statewide.

“There was really no playbook, nobody knew what to do,” said Specht, the Education Minnesota president. Walz “looked to the science, and he engaged our union quite a bit.”

Pushing against ‘hatred and bigotry’

In his 2023 State of the State address, Walz drew a pointed contrast between the culture wars raging in states such as Florida and the situation in Minnesota.

“The forces of hatred and bigotry are on the march in states across this country and around the world,” Walz said. “But let me say this now and be very clear about this: That march stops at Minnesota’s borders.”

Through his tenure, he repeatedly took up the causes of LGBTQ+ rights and racial justice.

He signed a measure prohibiting public and school libraries from banning books due to their messages or opinions, and another granting legal protection to children who travel to Minnesota for gender-affirming care.

“He’s a strong supporter of kids, he wants to build schools where young people can thrive,” said Rep. Leigh Finke (D), Minnesota’s first openly transgender lawmaker. “In Minnesota, we are providing meals. We’re not taking away books.”

Walz also signed a law last year that requires menstrual products be made available in all school bathrooms regularly used by “menstruating students” in grades 4 through 12, permitting the placement of pads and tampons in boys’ bathrooms. The inclusive language, meant to accommodate transgender children, has since drawn attacks from Republicans; conservatives in the state tried to amend the law so it only applied to women-only and gender-neutral restrooms, but failed.

Walz’s administration also updated teacher certification standards to require, among other things, that candidates examine their biases and affirm students’ gender identities and sexual orientations. And his education department revised state social studies standards to require ethnic studies, including an examination of social identities of race, gender, religion, geography and ethnicity.

Walz’s agenda drew backlash from Republican lawmakers in the state, who decried the book removal law as unnecessary — and warned that permitting gender-affirming care would undermine parental rights. Conservatives also unsuccessfully challenged the standards for teacher certification and social studies in court. In their own platform and a spate of 2022 bills, Republicans sought to boost parents’ control of education, for example proposing parents should review curriculums.

Walz has also attempted to address the significant racial disparities in academic achievement. White students score higher on standardized tests, according to a 2019 study by the Federal Reserve of Minneapolis, and Minnesota’s racial gap in graduation rates that year was the largest in the country, per the state’s Department of Human Rights.

Among the governor’s ideas to fix the problem: anti-bias training for school staff, stepped-up recruitment of teachers of color and more a inclusive curriculum.

Still, after five years of Walz’s governance, “we haven’t been able to move the needle much,” said Josh Crosson, the executive director of EdAllies, a statewide education group that advocates for students of color, those with disabilities and low-income learners. He said that’s partly due to the pandemic.

Crosson pointed to two Walz administration initiatives he thinks will help down the road. The 2023 READ Act requires schools to adopt “evidence-based” reading curriculums and teaching practices, such as sound-it-out instruction known as phonics. The act also gave schools $70 million to train teachers, conduct literacy assessments and purchase new curricular materials.

Crosson also cited a law Walz signed, which took effect last school year, forbidding suspensions as a form of punishment for students in kindergarten through third grade. (A 2022 state report found that Black students were eight times more likely to be suspended or expelled than White students.)

“It is a long-term investment in closing gaps in the future,” Crosson said of the two initiatives.

Nonetheless, Crosson said he wished Walz had done more to prevent school police officers from using a hold known as “prone restraint” on children in school. Black, multiracial and Native American special education students are disproportionately likely to be placed in physical holds at school, according to data from the Minnesota Department of Education.

After the murder of George Floyd, the governor signed a law forbidding prone restraints, which spurred many police departments to pull their officers from schools in protest. Ultimately, the Minnesota legislature reversed itself and passed another law allowing such restraints in “physically dangerous” situations, which Walz signed. And, Crosson said, he would have liked to see Walz do more to diversify Minnesota’s teacher workforce, which remains overwhelmingly White.

Mani Sayes, a biracial mother living in Minnesota’s Lakeville school district, said she is generally pleased with how Walz has conducted himself when it comes to education. She praised his attention to educators’ needs and his focus on achieving racial equity.

“He ensures when kids can go to school, they can learn,” said Sayes, 40. “If that means putting in free lunches to take the burden off parents, then he does that.”

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com