Author

admin

Browsing

Vladimir Kara-Murza, a Russian opposition politician and one of President Vladimir Putin’s fiercest critics, has described the psychological torture he endured during 11 months in solitary confinement, saying he thought he would die in a Siberian cell.

The British-Russian national was freed at the same time as Americans Evan Gershkovich, Paul Whelan and Alsu Kurmasheva, who were reunited with their families in emotional scenes at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland earlier this month.

“Just a little over two weeks ago, I was still sitting in my solitary confinement cell in a harsh regime prison colony in Siberia. And I was certain that I was going to end my life in the prison,” Kara-Murza said. “And here I am now sitting with you in a studio in New York next to my wife … It feels as if I’m watching some sort of film, it’s a really good film, but it still feels surreal.”

Since the death of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny in an Arctic prison in February, Kara-Murza has been the most prominent opposition figure persecuted by the Kremlin.

He was sentenced to 25 years in prison for treason for speaking out against Putin’s war in Ukraine and had spent two and a half years imprisoned in Russia. During that time, Kara-Murza was held in solitary confinement for 11 months and locked up in 13 different penitentiaries, including some of the most notorious prison colonies in the country.

He was allowed to speak on the phone with his wife only once and his three children just twice, he said.

Speaking to Erin Burnett alongside her husband, Evgenia Kara-Murza – who tirelessly lobbied for his release – said she is relieved that she no longer has “this nagging fear in the back of my mind at all times of the day that Vladimir can be killed at any moment.”

But she vowed to keep fighting for the other prisoners still locked up in “Vladimir Putin’s regime.”

“Thousands of people have been affected in the same way our family has been affected … This is a victory, but this is only the beginning,” she said.

“We understand that there are over a thousand political prisoners in Russia, that there are thousands of Ukrainians, civilian hostages and war prisoners, not to mention kidnapped Ukrainian kids. And we understand there are over a thousand political prisoners in neighboring Belarus. So, the fight will have to continue.”

‘Absolutely certain’ he was being led to execution

The night he was taken from the prison in Omsk, 2,700 kilometers (1,600 miles) away from Moscow, ahead of the prisoner swap, Kara-Murza said prison guards had burst into his cell at 3 a.m. telling him to “get up, get dressed and to get ready.”

“I was absolutely certain in that moment that I was going to be let out and get executed,” he said.

But Kara-Murza was taken to a passenger airport in Omsk and loaded onto a plane headed for Moscow.

After spending nearly a year locked in a tiny cell in solitary confinement with no one to talk to, Kara-Murza said he was suddenly thrust into “the middle of a busy passenger airport with normal people, families, kids, walking around.”

He was transferred to Moscow’s notorious Lefortovo Prison and held incommunicado with no idea he would soon be released.

Guards told him to dress in the only civilian clothes he had – a night shirt and rubber flip-flops he used in the shower – before taking him to a bus in the prison courtyard.

“It was a really a picture out of Hollywood movie. There was a row of men in black balaclavas covering their faces,” he said. “It was only then at the very last moment when I saw my friends and colleagues on that bus … that’s when I knew what was happening.”

Included in the release was a host of Russian activists, human rights defenders and opposition figures.

The sweeping deal involved 24 detainees in total and was the result of years of complicated behind-the-scenes negotiations involving the US, Russia, Belarus and Germany, ultimately leading Berlin to agree to Moscow’s key demand – releasing convicted Russian assassin Vadim Krasikov.

Kara-Muza said he stepped off the plane in Ankara, Turkey and was handed a phone with US President Joe Biden calling. Standing next to Biden in the Oval Office in Washington, DC and joining the call were his wife and kids.

Speaking to his family for the first time since his release, Kara-Muza said, “I don’t believe what’s happening. I still think I’m sleeping in my prison cell in Omsk instead of hearing your voice.”

‘Psychological torture’

On Monday, Kara-Murza said that while physical torture is rife in Russia’s prison system, high profile political prisoners are kept isolated in an “enforced solitude” that is “no better than physical torture.”

“Every day is like Groundhog Day. It’s meaningless, it’s endless and it’s exactly the same,” he said. “When you have absolutely nobody to like exchange a single word with, it really starts to get on your mind.”

Kara-Murza described the brutal conditions of being kept in a tiny cell all day with nothing to do and no one to talk to.

“You wake up at 5:00 a.m. in the morning with an official wake-up call. Your bunk gets attached to the wall so there’s no way you can lie or properly sit down all day. All you can do is just walk around the cell,” he said.

Inmates were allowed a pen and paper for only 90 minutes a day, and “the only time I got taken out of the cell is to go out for a so-called walk, which is basically just walking around in a circle in a small covered internal prison courtyard.”

While held in the “special regime” Penal Colony No. 7 in Omsk, Kara-Murza said conditions were “really harsh” but one “big plus” was the cats that would walk around the facility.

“When I was walking around in the courtyard the cats would come in and sit next to the metal bars and I was able to have a conversation with them. These were my only interlocutors,” he said.

Now enjoying his freedom and time with his family, Kara-Murza has promised to return to Russia.

“I know that Russia will change, and I will be back to my homeland,” he said, adding, “it will be much quicker” than anyone might think.

His wife Evgenia agreed: “The fight continues. We’re going to have to do everything we can to bring down this regime and this evil,” she said.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

The pilot killed when a helicopter crashed into the roof of a luxury hotel in Cairns, Australia, on Monday was an employee of the charter company that owned the aircraft, but wasn’t authorized to fly, the group confirmed in a statement.

Nautilus Aviation said Tuesday that the pilot had been with the company for four months and had attended a party the night before the crash to celebrate their promotion to another ground crew job with the firm at another base.

“This was not a work event and was coordinated by friends,” the statement said.

Hundreds of guests and staff of the DoubleTree by Hilton Hotel were evacuated when the helicopter crashed into the building near the Cairns Esplanade, a waterfront boardwalk popular with travelers in the north Queensland city, in the early hours of Monday.

Flames leaped into the night sky after the aircraft burst into flames, spilling fuel across the top of the hotel, damaging some upper windows of the seven-story building.

Two holidaymakers who had been sleeping on the top floor of the hotel were taken to hospital with minor injuries.

Queensland Police Acting Assistant Commissioner Shane Holmes said Monday the pilot had made “an unauthorized flight,” but declined to comment on whether the helicopter had been stolen or whether the crash was deliberate, saying all lines of inquiry remained open.

Angus Mitchell, chief commissioner of the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB), said investigators believe the helicopter took off from the general aviation hangar at Cairns Airport, about 5 kilometers (3 miles) from the hotel.

“We know that visibility was down at the time and there was possible rain,” he said.

“We want to understand what the helicopter was equipped with, but also potentially what the helicopter was doing at the time and any nature of the flight.”

Witness Veronica Knight, who was visiting Cairns from Sydney, was sitting on the esplanade, talking on the phone after midnight, when she saw a helicopter fly by very low over the water.

Seconds later, it hit the roof of the hotel, just before 2 a.m.

Knight’s videos show the orange glow of flames and smoke coming from the top of the hotel, while sirens wail in the distance.

She said the helicopter had passed over trees and another taller building before hitting the roof of the hotel.

“[The pilot] would have known those buildings were there,” said Knight.

Other investigators include the forensic crash unit and the ATSB, which sent a team to the crash site on Monday to gather evidence and conduct interviews.

The bureau asked witnesses with any photos or videos of the helicopter to contact authorities through its website.

This post appeared first on cnn.com

JPMorgan Chase has rolled out a generative artificial intelligence assistant to tens of thousands of its employees in recent weeks, the initial phase of a broader plan to inject the technology throughout the sprawling financial giant.

The program, called LLM Suite, is already available to more than 60,000 employees, helping them with tasks like writing emails and reports. The software is expected to eventually be as ubiquitous within the bank as the videoconferencing program Zoom, people with knowledge of the plans told CNBC.

Rather than developing its own AI models, JPMorgan designed LLM Suite to be a portal that allows users to tap external large language models — the complex programs underpinning generative AI tools — and launched it with ChatGPT maker OpenAI’s LLM, said the people.

“Ultimately, we’d like to be able to move pretty fluidly across models depending on the use cases,” Teresa Heitsenrether, JPMorgan’s chief data and analytics officer, said in an interview. “The plan is not to be beholden to any one model provider.”

The move by JPMorgan, the largest U.S. bank by assets, shows how quickly generative AI has swept through American corporations since the arrival of ChatGPT in late 2022. Rival bank Morgan Stanley has already released a pair of OpenAI-powered tools for its financial advisors. And consumer tech giant Apple said in June that it was integrating OpenAI models into the operating system of hundreds of millions of its consumer devices, vastly expanding its reach.

The technology — hailed by some as the “Cognitive Revolution” in which tasks formerly done by knowledge workers will be automated — could be as important as the advent of electricity, the printing press and the internet, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon said in April.

It will likely “augment virtually every job” at the bank, Dimon said. JPMorgan had about 313,000 employees as of June.

The bank is giving employees what is essentially OpenAI’s ChatGPT in a JPMorgan-approved wrapper more than a year after it restricted employees from using ChatGPT. That’s because JPMorgan didn’t want to expose its data to external providers, Heitsenrether said.

“Since our data is a key differentiator, we don’t want it being used to train the model,” she said. “We’ve implemented it in a way that we can leverage the model while still keeping our data protected.”

The bank has introduced LLM Suite broadly across the company, with groups using it in JPMorgan’s consumer division, investment bank, and asset and wealth management business, the people said. It can help employees with writing, summarizing lengthy documents, problem solving using Excel, and generating ideas.

But getting it on employees’ desktops is just the first step, according to Heitsenrether, who was promoted in 2023 to lead the bank’s adoption of the red-hot technology.

“You have to teach people how to do prompt engineering that is relevant for their domain to show them what it can actually do,” Heitsenrether said. “The more people get deep into it and unlock what it’s good at and what it’s not, the more we’re starting to see the ideas really flourishing.”

The bank’s engineers can also use LLM Suite to incorporate functions from external AI models directly into their programs, she said.

JPMorgan has been working on traditional AI and machine learning for more than a decade, but the arrival of ChatGPT forced it to pivot.

Traditional, or narrow, AI performs specific tasks involving pattern recognition, like making predictions based on historical data. Generative AI is more advanced, however, and trains models on vast data sets with the goal of pattern creation, which is how human-sounding text or realistic images are formed.

The number of uses for generative AI are “exponentially bigger” than previous technology because of how flexible LLMs are, Heitsenrether said.

The bank is testing many cases for both forms of AI and has already put a few into production.

JPMorgan is using generative AI to create marketing content for social media channels, map out itineraries for clients of the travel agency it acquired in 2022 and summarize meetings for financial advisors, she said.

The consumer bank uses AI to determine where to place new branches and ATMs by ingesting satellite images and in call centers to help service personnel quickly find answers, Heitsenrether said.

In the firm’s global-payments business, which moves more than $8 trillion around the world daily, AI helps prevent hundreds of millions of dollars in fraud, she said.

But the bank is being more cautious with generative AI that directly touches upon the individual customer because of the risk that a chatbot gives bad information, Heitsenrether said.

Ultimately, the generative AI field may develop into “five or six big foundational models” that dominate the market, she said.

The bank is testing LLMs from U.S. tech giants as well as open source models to onboard to its portal next, said the people, who declined to be identified speaking about the bank’s AI strategy.

Heitsenrether charted out three stages for the evolution of generative AI at JPMorgan.

The first is simply making the models available to workers; the second involves adding proprietary JPMorgan data to help boost employee productivity, which is the stage that has just begun at the company.

The third is a larger leap that would unlock far greater productivity gains, which is when generative AI is powerful enough to operate as autonomous agents that perform complex multistep tasks. That would make rank-and-file employees more like managers with AI assistants at their command.

The technology will likely empower some workers while displacing others, changing the composition of the industry in ways that are hard to predict.

Banking jobs are the most prone to automation of all industries, including technology, health care and retail, according to consulting firm Accenture. AI could boost the sector’s profits by $170 billion in just four years, Citigroup analysts said. 

People should consider generative AI “like an assistant that takes away the more mundane things that we would all like to not do, where it can just give you the answer without grinding through the spreadsheets,” Heitsenrether said.

“You can focus on the higher-value work,” she said.

— CNBC’s Leslie Picker contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Held off on taking a summer vacation? You may still be able to squeeze in one on the cheap.

Record numbers of travelers have been flooding airports since the pandemic, but U.S. airlines now face a surplus of empty seats after racing to add capacity. Many are slashing prices to fill them, making bargain flights more readily available than they have been in years, travel agents and industry experts say.

Tourists near Monastiraki Square in Athens, Greece, on July 31, 2024. Nikolas Kokovlis / NurPhoto via Getty Images

“Deals are easier to find this summer since prices are already so low,” said Hayley Berg, lead economist at the travel booking site Hopper.

Flights overall were at least 5% cheaper as of June than the year before, government inflation data shows. Hopper estimated domestic airfares for August are down about 6% since a year ago, and it flagged supercheap domestic round-trip deals this month — like $69 for Chicago to Baltimore and $82 for New York to Nashville.

And it’s not just airfares — costs are cooling off for car rentals and hotel rooms too. They were down roughly 6% and 3% year over year, respectively, in the federal data and are now about flat in most cities on Priceline.

For clients with a little flexibility in their travel dates, I’ve been able to get very low airfare for last-minute trips.

Ashley D’Aristotile, owner of Flyaway Travel

The discounts expand the map for late-season travelers and coincide with a broader value push this summer. Restaurant chains from McDonald’s to P.F. Chang’s are dangling promotions to hang on to frugal customers. The gambit is largely working, with major retailers’ recent sales helping prop up consumer spending and the economy as a whole.

Vacation-planning procrastinators are having better luck this year.

On July 26, Debra Banton, 61, and her 26-year-old daughter Rachel booked a trip overseas departing in two weeks.

“We usually plan way in advance, never last minute,” said Banton, who lives in Charleston, South Carolina. But Rachel works full time while attending school, leaving little down time, and since she’s never been to Europe and is getting married next May, they figured now’s their best shot.

“With just four weeks’ planning time, I was able to secure the last few rooms at some fabulous resorts in Greece and get them a great deal on business-class air to Athens,” said Kimberly Hilliard, their Annapolis, Maryland-based travel adviser with Front Porch Travel.

While prices typically come down heading into the fall, the current end-of-summer season is a “unique window” for travelers who haven’t booked far in advance, said Jesse Neugarten, the CEO and founder of Dollar Flight Club.

The flight alert site said the average international airfare from the U.S. over the next three months is $401, and the average domestic flight costs $212 — collectively down an average of 29% from the same period a year ago.

“For clients with a little flexibility in their travel dates, I’ve been able to get very low airfare for last-minute trips,” said Ashley D’Aristotile, the owner of Orlando, Florida-based Flyaway Travel.

Lousson Smith, a flight expert at the travel site Going, agrees: “At this point in the summer, if you’re flexible, you can find something really nice under $150 nonstop from major markets, but anything under $200 this late in the game is a decent deal.”

While the costs of U.S. flights to Europe soared during the post-pandemic travel boom, Hopper estimates international airfares have fallen 9% since last summer. Round trips from Boston to Dublin, for example, have been going for as low as $415 this month, Hopper said, and there are $461 options between Chicago and Paris.

Domestically, the Southeast is seeing some of the best bargains, according to Priceline, with both Miami and Nashville making its “most affordable” list for August.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Trump Media, the social media company whose majority shareholder is former President Donald Trump, on Friday reported a net loss of more than $16 million for the most recent financial quarter, mostly due to legal expenses, as well as consulting and licensing expenses.

Trump Media, which owns the Truth Social app often used by the former president, also reported that its already meager revenue dropped by 30% for the three months that ended June 30, compared to the same period last year.

The stock price of Trump Media, which trades under the DJT ticker, has fallen sharply from a high of more than $71 per share shortly after began publicly trading in late March following a merger with a so-called special purpose acquisition corporation. Trump Media stock closed at $26.21 per share Friday afternoon, a decrease of .49%.

The company has a market capitalization of nearly $5 billion, an extraordinarily high valuation given its very modest sales.

In its 10-Q filing Friday afternoon, Trump Media reported a loss of $16.37 million for the quarter ending June 30, compared to a $22.8 million loss for the same quarter in 2023.

About half of the loss for the past quarter was due to legal expenses related to Trump Media’s merger with Digital World Acquisition Corp., the company said.

“Additionally, the Company incurred $3.1 million of IT consulting and software licensing expenses, primarily related to its software licensing agreement to power its new TV streaming service,” Trump Media said in a press release.

Revenue for the most recent quarter was just $839,000, compared to $1.2 million for the same quarter last year.

“A significant portion of the decrease was attributable to a change in the revenue share with one of our advertising partners, in connection with an agreement intended to improve the Company’s short-term, pre-Business Combination financial position,” Trump Media said in its 10-Q filing.

“Additionally, revenue has varied as we selectively test a nascent advertising initiative on the Company’s Truth Social platform,” the company said.

Trump Media said it ended the quarter with $344 million in cash and cash equivalents, with no debt.

“The Company believes its strong balance sheet will enable the expansion and refinement of its new TV streaming platform, Truth+, which was launched in August 2024 on the Company’s custom-built content delivery network (‘CDN’),” Trump Media said in a press release.

“With its strong balance sheet and zero debt load, the Company believes it has sufficient working capital to fund operations for the foreseeable future,” the company said.

Donald Trump, who is the Republican presidential nominee, and his running mate Sen. JD Vance of Ohio are set to face the Democratic nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris, and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz in November’s election.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Wealthy investors and family offices shied away from stocks leading up to market swings this week, but many saw the drop in prices as an opportunity for tax savings and estate planning, according to wealth advisors.

Private banks and wealth managers say their clients have been reducing their stock holdings for over a year as part of a broader shift from public to private markets in light of recent concerns about an overheated tech sector.

According to a UBS family office survey, family offices have 35% of their portfolios in private equity — the largest of any asset class — compared with just 28% in equities. A Deloitte survey found that family office holdings of equities fell from 34% to 25% from 2021 to 2023, while their private equity jumped from 22% in 2021 to 30% in 2023.

When stocks tumbled Monday, with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq down 3%, wealthy investors neither panicked nor jumped in to buy, according to several advisors. They did have a lot of questions.

“The common question from clients was ‘What’s going on?’” said Sean Apgar, partner and co-head of portfolio and wealth advisory at BBR Partners, which advises ultra-wealthy clients. “It was more out of curiosity; there was no real motive for action.”

Apgar said the clients BBR advises — most worth hundreds of millions or billions — don’t react to short-term market events given their long investing horizons. Yet they did want to be educated about the market moves, the Japanese carry trade, the growing recession fears and rate cut odds. For his clients, their investment plan is still their investment plan. 

“The best thing clients can do right now is sit back and feel good about the investment plan we put in place with them long ago, with expected volatility and corrections along the way,” Apgar said.

The drop in prices last Friday and Monday also offered a chance for wealthy investors to take advantage of tax benefits and gift strategies.

William Sinclair, head of the financial institutions group and the U.S. family office practice at J.P. Morgan Private Bank, said a growing number of clients have so-called “separately managed accounts,” discreet accounts designed to hold a specific group of assets or stocks. With separate accounts, clients can more easily sell stocks that have declined in value and realize losses they can use to offset capital gains from their winning stocks, known as “tax-loss harvesting.”

With some Big Tech stocks down 15% or more over the past month, wealthy investors are selling at a loss, reaping the tax benefits and buying the stock back at a later date to retain their position.

“For taxable clients, the biggest inflows have been in tax loss harvesting strategies,” Sinclair said.

Others are using the price swings for estate planning. Under the current rules of the estate and gift tax, married couples can transfer up to $27.22 million to heirs and family members, while individuals can transfer up to $13.61 million. With the gift and estate exemption amount scheduled to expire at the end of next year, many wealthy investors are working to give away the maximum before the expiration.

Gifting stocks that have declined in value carries more benefits, since it allows investors to gift more stock under the exemption amount.

“Say you have a stock that was worth $100 and now it’s worth $80, you can transfer that lower value to the next generation, assuming the assets will eventually appreciate again,” Apgar said. “So you’re taking advantage of the depressed values. Tax advisors get generally excited about these environments because it opens up new opportunities.”

One group of clients that’s more sensitive to the recent bouts of volatility is made up of corporate founders and top executives. Since they often have a large portion of their wealth tied up in one company stock, advisors can help them structure complex hedges — such as variable prepaid forwards and exchange funds — to help dampen the blow of big stock declines. The stock decline of the past week highlighted the benefits of so-called “collaring” structures to many founders and CEOs. 

“People in these roles, in the C-suite, know that their job, as well as career, is going to center on the stock,” said Jennifer Povlitz, division director at UBS Wealth Management U.S., which advises many clients with concentrated stock positions. “So the financial planning part has to be a consideration.”

While the S&P 500 is still up roughly 10% this year, after gaining 24% in 2023, ultra-wealthy investors and family offices are continuing to shift more of their money into alternatives, especially private equity. Many see private companies as more stable and profitable over the long term compared to equities — especially after days like Monday. And they can have more impact on management with direct stakes in private companies. 

“Most family offices are so invested in alternatives, hedge funds, PE and real estate, that they aren’t moving their investments around anyway,” said Geoffrey von Kuhn, an advisor to several of the nation’s largest family offices.

Richard Weintraub, family office group head of the Americas at Citi Private Bank, said family offices have been moving their money to longer-term investments — which can grow over decades or generations — with less volatility. Along with private equity and venture, the big trend among family offices is direct deals to buy stakes or control of private companies.

“The larger family offices, so $10 billion plus, are deploying capital into operating companies they can hold in perpetuity and pass down generation to generation,” Weintraub said. “Like building the Buffett model.”

He added that the stock swoons of the past week “reinforced the idea of making that shift toward private investments.”

Michael Pelzar, head of investments at Bank of America Private Bank, said high-net-worth investors are still catching up to family offices when it comes to private markets and alternatives.

“In general, I think high-net-worth investors are under-allocated to alternatives,” Pelzar said. “We see this [volatility] as a catalyst to enable high-net-worth investors to continue to broaden their portfolio. I think that after this week there will be more open-mindedness when it comes to alternatives, whether in PE or real estate.”

Advisors say that when it comes to the overall investing environment, the biggest worries of high-net-worth investors are about geopolitical risks and fiscal spending. Jimmy Chang, CIO for Rockefeller Global Family Office, said the most common question clients are asking is not about stock market volatility but about the impact of government debt and deficits.

“They want to know the implications for tax planning and also for the economy and the market,” he said.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

DETROIT — General Motors on Monday revealed redesigned versions of its entry-level GMC Terrain crossover, including a new standard “Elevation” model.

The compact crossover features a more rugged exterior design. It also has a new interior with 26 inches of screens, including a 15-inch center touchscreen and an 11-inch driver information cluster.

Those screens are part of a group of new standard safety and convenience features for the vehicle, including adaptive cruise control, front heated seats and enhanced automatic emergency braking. Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, which replicate phone apps for navigation and music, among other things, also are standard.

2025 GMC Terrain.GM

With the increase in standard features, GM also is simplifying the model lineup for the Terrain, combining its “SLE” and “SLT” entry-level trims into Elevation. The brand uses the Elevation trim on other vehicles as well.

GM declined to disclose pricing for the redesigned Terrain, which is expected to begin arriving in GMC showrooms late this year. Current starting prices range from about $30,000 to $40,000.

The Elevation trim will launch first, followed by the off-road-inspired AT4 and luxury Denali models.

2025-2026 GMC Terrain.GM

The Terrain is typically one of the bestselling non-truck nameplates for GMC, which has vehicles ranging from the compact crossover to large trucks and SUVs, including the GMC Hummer EVs.

Sales of the Terrain, which is produced in Mexico, were up 31% year over year through the first half of the year after a 17% decline in 2023.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

The Biden Administration on Monday unveiled a new, multi-agency regulatory initiative to target corporate practices that officials claim are designed to waste consumers’ time and needlessly burden them with red tape, in order to maximize profits.

“I think we can all relate to this,” White House domestic policy advisor Neera Tanden told reporters Friday.

“For example, you want to cancel your gym membership or subscription service or newspaper. It took one or two clicks to sign up. But now … you have to go in person, or wait on hold for 20 minutes … just to opt out,” she said.

Dubbed the “Time is Money” initiative, the actions will make it easier for consumers to cancel subscriptions, get refunds, submit health care and insurance forms online, and access high-quality customer service.

The new initiative is being launched at a unique moment for the Biden administration. Democratic presidential nominee and Vice President Kamala Harris is preparing to unveil her presidential campaign’s first economic policy plans this week.

Broad efforts like “Time is Money” could serve as opportunities for Harris to carry forward the Biden administration’s longstanding consumer protection mandate in new ways.

“In all of these practices, the companies are delaying services to you, or really trying to make it so difficult for you to cancel the service, that they get to hold on to your money for longer and longer,” Tanden said Friday.

Among the new initiatives announced Monday are a series of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) rule makings, that will target customer service “doom loops” and ineffective chatbots used by some financial institutions.

“The CFPB will identify when the use of automated chatbots or automated artificial intelligence voice recordings is unlawful, including in situations in which customers believe they are speaking with a human being,” according to a White House fact sheet.

Meanwhile, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will launch a parallel inquiry into whether to expand the CFPB’s proposed customer service requirements to include phone, broadband and cable providers.

The second FCC inquiry will consider adopting requirements similar to the Federal Trade Commission’s current “Click to Cancel” proposal. The FTC plan would require companies to make it as easy to cancel subscriptions and memberships as it is to sign up for them.

The initiative also calls on health insurance companies to allow policyholders to submit claims online.

A letter from Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra and Department of Labor Acting Secretary Julie Su will be sent to health insurance companies and group health plans on Monday, urging them “to take concrete actions to save people time and money when interacting with their health coverage,” according to the White House fact sheet.

Not all of the “Time is Money” initiatives are new, however. Several are previously announced actions, including a rule issued by the Department of Transportation in April that requires airlines to automatically issue cash refunds.

Another existing effort cited by the White House is a June 2023 FTC proposal to target companies that use deceptive customer feedback practices, like fake reviews.

None of the actions that make up the “Time is Money” initiative will require congressional approval, a senior administration official said. Republicans currently control the House of Representatives, and any new consumer protection bills would face long odds.

Monday’s “Time is Money” initiatives are the latest step in a long line of aggressive consumer protection actions the Biden administration has taken over the past three years.

The White House has pursued aggressive antitrust regulations and taken a highly skeptical approach to crypto currencies, both of which have rankled Wall Street.

Biden has also championed a fight against what he labels “unfair and illegal pricing,” including so-called junk fees, corporate “price gouging” and shrinkflation.

Still, the White House official insisted to reporters Friday that “this is not about shaming corporations writ large.”

Instead, the “Time is Money” initiatives represent “a new frontier of consumer protections,” the official said. “That is the way that we are thinking about it.”

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

“She cast the deciding vote for the so-called Inflation Reduction Act that sent a lot of our resources to China.”

— JD Vance, GOP vice-presidential candidate, remarks in Eau Claire, Wis., Aug. 7

“Kamala Harris has doubled down on this green energy scam that’s actually shipped a lot more manufacturing jobs to China.”

— Vance, remarks in Waite Park, Minn., July 28

As Vance has toured the industrial Midwest in recent weeks, one of his consistent claims is that Vice President Kamala Harris shipped jobs to China by casting the tiebreaking vote in 2022 in the Senate for the Inflation Reduction Act, a catchall bill that included $370 billion in climate and energy funding to combat climate change.

His comments in Minnesota won the approval of Donald Trump Jr., who posted on social media that Vance “destroys Kamala’s anti-American energy and manufacturing record.”

Trump’s son may be impressed by the rhetoric, but on the face of it, Vance’s claims make little sense. The IRA was designed to foster green manufacturing jobs in the United States — and the evidence shows that it’s working. What’s Vance’s case for saying that the IRA is sending “a lot of our resources” and “more manufacturing jobs” to China?

The facts

Vance’s spokesman pointed us to an opinion article that Vance wrote for the Toledo Blade in 2023 urging the United Auto Workers to use its leverage to persuade the Biden administration to abandon efforts to encourage electric vehicles. “China dominates the global supply chain for electric vehicles — especially for critical minerals and batteries,” Vance wrote. “While an electric vehicle may bear the logo of Ford, Chevy, or Chrysler, its core components were probably made in China with Chinese labor and Chinese materials.”

In effect, Vance’s theory is that by shifting the auto industry toward EVs, the United States is going to send significant amounts of money and jobs to China.

But this claim ignores what is actually in the IRA. The law was intended to help the United States catch up with China before Beijing completely takes over the EV market. The Chinese government has given huge subsidies to the EV industry in a quest to dominate it.

In 2021, the United States accounted for 10 percent of global EV assembly and 7 percent of battery production, according to the International Energy Agency. That same year, China sold more EVs than the rest of the world combined — and produced three-quarters of all lithium-ion batteries.

The Biden administration and congressional leaders understood there was a balancing act — boosting EV production without aiding China.

So the law included provisions to make sure more of the supply chain is produced in the United States, such as a consumer tax credit for EVs. The Treasury Department wrote regulations that make it harder for vehicles to qualify for the full federal EV tax credit of $7,500 if key components are sourced from China, with a grace period for some rare materials like graphite. As part of the IRA, final assembly of EV models must occur in North America to be eligible. The administration in May also imposed a 100 percent tariff on Chinese EVs.

In response to the IRA, China in March filed a formal complaint with the World Trade Organization, decrying the EV subsidy policy as discriminatory because it excluded Chinese products, distorted fair competition and disrupted the global supply chain for new-energy vehicles. That’s a significant step — which may take a long time to resolve in the WTO dispute settlement system — but it’s certainly a sign that China does not believe the law is sending jobs its way.

Indeed, General Motors board member Jon McNeill, a former president of Tesla, told CNBC in May that any rollback of the IRA provisions would help China. “I think we risk losing the auto manufacturing share to China. We really do, globally,” he said, adding that the IRA is providing enticements to both the manufacturers and consumers “to level the playing field” against Chinese car companies.

When Trump was president, he did not encourage EV production or seek to counter China’s big investment in the technology. Trump would sometimes joke — falsely — about how little an EV could travel on a single charge. He proposed to eliminate programs that encouraged the manufacture or purchase of EVs and proposed no legislation designed to encourage EV manufacturing in the United States.

During this presidential campaign, Trump has pledged to repeal automobile air pollution limits issued in March by the Environmental Protection Agency — what he claims is an “EV mandate” — on his first day in office. The Biden administration has also set a goal of having 50 percent of all new vehicle sales be electric by 2030.

The other problem with Vance’s critique is that he ignores that many provisions in the IRA have sparked a manufacturing boom in the United States — also designed to counter China’s dominance in the green energy arena. Besides EVs, the bill included tax incentives intended to spur manufacturing of solar modules, wind turbines, inverters, EV batteries and power storage, and the extraction and refining of critical minerals. According to the IEA, China now has 85 percent of solar cell manufacturing capacity, while only 0.6 percent is located in North America, so there is a lot of ground to make up.

In the first year after passage of the IRA, according to an analysis by Goldman Sachs, 280 clean energy projects were announced across 44 states, representing $282 billion of investment that would create 175,000 jobs. “What we found was that — so far at least — the reality is living up to or even exceeding expectations,” the report said.

An updated count issued in June by Climate Power, an environmental communications group, estimated that the investment has climbed to $361 billion in 47 states, representing 585 projects and creating nearly 313,000 jobs. “Plans include 173 new battery manufacturing sites, 137 new or expanded electric vehicle manufacturing facilities, and 166 solar and wind manufacturing plants,” the report said, adding that a majority of the projects are in districts represented by Republican House members.

This month, 18 House Republicans sent a letter to House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) urging that the IRA not be fully repealed if Republicans retain control of the House. “Energy tax credits have spurred innovation, incentivized investment, and created good jobs in many parts of the country — including many districts represented by members of our conference,” the letter said.

Vance’s blast that earned the admiration of Trump’s son was made in Waite Park. Evidence of the IRA’s impact could have been found if Vance had driven for a half-hour to the nearby Minnesota town of Becker — where regulators in July approved a permit to replace a massive coal plant with one of America’s largest solar farms. The project was realized with the help of the IRA, company officials said, and will create 400 union construction jobs.

Xcel Energy chief executive Bob Frenzel told analysts that “the solar tax credit in the Inflation Reduction Act will lower the ‘levelized’ cost of the company’s Sherco solar project in Minnesota by 30 percent, even accounting for inflation and supply chain pressures,” Politico’s E&E News reported. The project also received tens of millions of dollars in direct funding because of the IRA.

“Xcel predicted in PUC filings Sherco 3 would decrease customer bills through the first 10 years of operations thanks to production tax credits,” the Star Tribune reported.

The Pinocchio Test

Vance’s claim that the IRA is sending jobs and resources to China is based on a facile hunch, not evidence. He assumes that China will benefit if more EVs are sold because China currently dominates the supply chain. He ignores that the IRA is intended to break up that pattern — and bring more of those jobs to the United States. That’s one reason China has formally protested the law. He also ignores the fact that the IRA is creating many jobs — even in communities where he makes these outlandish claims.

Vance earns Four Pinocchios.

Four Pinocchios

(About our rating scale)

Send us facts to check by filling out this form

Sign up for The Fact Checker weekly newsletter

The Fact Checker is a verified signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network code of principles

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com

The first person who I noticed spreading the idea that images of Vice President Kamala Harris’s rally in Michigan had been manipulated was conservative moviemaker Dinesh D’Souza.

On Saturday evening, D’Souza posted a photo on social media of Harris exiting her airplane with a crowd of supporters looking on. Two reflections from the airplane were circled in red, illustrating that, despite the crowd, no one was visible in the reflection.

“Does this look like a real picture to you?” D’Souza asked. Within hours, similar questions were everywhere on social media — and by Sunday had popped up in former president Donald Trump’s feed at Truth Social.

“Has anyone noticed that Kamala CHEATED at the airport? There was nobody at the plane, and she ‘A.I.’d’ it, and showed a massive ‘crowd’ of so-called followers, BUT THEY DIDN’T EXIST!” Trump wrote. “She was turned in by a maintenance worker at the airport when he noticed the fake crowd picture, but there was nobody there, later confirmed by the reflection of the mirror like finish on the Vice Presidential Plane.”

“She’s a CHEATER,” he reiterated.

That D’Souza was at the leading edge of this argument is not surprising. It was D’Souza, you may recall, who produced a feature-length movie arguing without evidence that the 2020 election had been stolen by “mules” who collected and submitted ballots on behalf of Joe Biden. Then, as now, D’Souza’s claims were rooted in a trivial misrepresentation of digital information.

There was a crowd in Michigan to meet Harris, as shown below in a photograph taken by a Washington Post photographer. You can also see why the reflection from the plane didn’t show the crowd; it was angled away from the speaking platform.

No AI. No whistleblowing maintenance worker, ginned up from the ether to make the claim of dishonesty seem more credible. And no “cheating” by Harris.

Why would Trump and his allies spread a false claim about attendance at a rally that was covered on C-SPAN? In part because many elements of Trump’s base have embraced rejections of basic reality (like the existence of “mules”) for years. In part, it’s confirmation bias, with partisans being more likely to accept false information as true when it supports their preexisting beliefs. But in part, it’s because Trump and his allies are already eagerly raising questions about the reliability of measures of Harris’s support — and by extension, the reliability of the results in November.

Harris is a CHEATER, Trump asserts. It is not subtle.

Recall that his efforts to reject the 2020 results did not emerge out of the blue in November of that year. Trump began raising questions about the purported insecurity of mail-in ballots soon after it became obvious that the coronavirus pandemic would spur more remote voting. He and his staff amplified all sorts of claims about ballot security, including a bizarre claim that July that a mail truck that caught fire was somehow suspicious. His base was more than prepared when he subsequently challenged the actual election results.

That’s the pattern that is again underway, exemplified well beyond this one goofy assertion about the Michigan rally. In reporting its lengthy assessment of Trump’s recent campaign stumbles, the New York Times spoke with someone close to Trump who described the former president’s framing of Harris’s ascent to be her party’s nominee.

“Mr. Trump told one aide,” Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan reported, “that Democrats were trying to ‘steal’ the election again from him — comparing the reshuffling of the Democratic ticket to when state legislatures changed voting rules midway through the 2020 election cycle because of the Covid pandemic.”

States making it easier for people to vote without risking coronavirus infections in 2020 was not cheating in any way that doesn’t assume that ensuring voters can vote is somehow unfair. Nor is a political party choosing its own nominee. But it is important to Trump that he keep this escape hatch open, this idea that the election was or will be stolen from him even in the most abstract terms, because it allows him to muster resources to contest his loss or, alternatively, to retain the loyalty of his base.

A loss this November looks more possible than it did a month ago, certainly. Over the weekend, the New York Times released new swing-state polling showing Harris with leads across the Upper Midwest. So, naturally, Trump’s campaign released a memo suggesting that the polling was fake or misleading.

The results, pollster Tony Fabrizio and data consultant Tim Saler argue, “dramatically understated President Trump’s support both among all registered voters and in their likely-voter model.” Their evidence for this is that the recalled vote of respondents — that is, people saying how they voted in 2020 — understates the actual support Trump saw in those states four years ago.

As Fabrizio certainly knows, though, voter recall is unreliable. People tend to misremember or misreport how they actually voted, with a shift in favor of the electoral winner. In fact, there’s been research showing that using recalled votes to adjust current polls is fraught. But that’s what Fabrizio and Saler do.

“In each state, the gap between the survey’s recalled 2020 vote and the reported 2020 election results is more than the margin between Kamala Harris and President Trump,” they write. “Once again, we see a series of public surveys released with the clear intent and purpose of depressing support for President Trump.”

That last argument is particularly silly. The idea — one Trump himself offered repeatedly in 2020 — is that polls showing Trump trailing somehow make Trump supporters less likely to support Trump. It’s not clear how this manifests; is the argument that those voters will consider casting a ballot in November until they remember the Times’s August poll?

The simple answer is that this unskewing of the poll (to revive an infamous 2012 phrase) is simply meant to suggest that no measure of reality can be trusted unless it favors Trump. The results in those states might not reflect this poll, certainly, but the argument that the results were skewed against Trump to damage him in some esoteric way is ridiculous. Almost as ridiculous as claiming that an unnamed worker at an airport is more reliable than multiple photos and live video.

But the point isn’t to increase Trump’s credibility. It’s to erode everyone else’s. That way, when they accurately report the results in November, Trump can remind his supporters to reject them if necessary.

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com